A Study on the Boundary-Crossing Learning Process and Results Trends of Teachers under Three Metaphors of Learning
-
摘要: 在当下中小学对优质教育资源需求不断扩大的背景下,教师如何提升跨界学习能力已经成为一个重要议题。教师需要不断跨越学校固定的“地界”,通过轮岗、支教、大中小学合作等方式,利用边界处的学习资源和跨界产生的创生资源,重新检视自己习以为常的思维经验和专业实践,在深度反思中形成新的对教育教学的理解和行动。本研究从“获得”“参与”和“拓展”三种学习隐喻的分析视角入手,结合观察、访谈等方法获取丰富的实证数据,以叙事方式呈现教师不同情境中的跨界学习过程,并参考阿克尔曼和贝克提出的“识别-协调-反思-转化”跨界学习机制,讨论三种跨界学习的结果和趋向。基于此,本研究从制度、互动关系和个人三个层面提出相关建议。Abstract: In the context of the new curriculum reform and the increasing demand for high-quality educational resources in primary and secondary schools, how teachers can enhance their boundary-crossing learning capacity has become a significant issue. Teachers need to continually transcend the fixed "boundaries" of their schools through methods such as teacher rotation, educational support programs, and university-school collaboration. By utilizing the learning resources at the boundaries and the creative resources generated by crossing boundaries, they can re-examine their habitual thinking experiences and professional practices, thereby changing their ideological concepts and behavioral patterns. From the analytical perspectives of the three learning metaphors—"acquisition," "participation," and "knowledge creation", and employing methods such as observation and interviews to gather rich empirical data, this study presents teacher boundary-crossing learning processes in different contexts through a narrative approach. With reference to Akkerman and Bakker's boundary-crossing learning mechanism of "identification-coordination-reflection-transformation," it discusses the outcomes and trends of the three types of boundary-crossing learning.
-
[1] SFARD A. On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one[J]. Educational researcher, 1998(2): 4-13. [2] 吴刚, 洪建中. 一种新的学习隐喻: 拓展性学习的研究——基于"文化-历史"活动理论视角[J] 远程教育杂志, 2012(3): 24. [3] 陈向明. 跨界课例研究中的教师学习[J]. 教育学报, 2020(2): 47-58. [4] SANNE F. Akkerman, Arthur Bakker. Boundary crossing and boundary objects[J]. Review of educational research, 2011(2): 132-169. [5] 王晓芳. 大学与中小学协作情境中的教师跨界学习研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2019: 121. [6] 朱旭东, 斐淼. 教师学习模式研究中国的经验[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2017: 111. [7] ENGESTRÖM, Y. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization[J]. Journal of education and work, 2001(1): 133-156. [8] 陈向明. 中小学教师为什么要做研究[J]. 教育发展研究, 2019(8): 67-72. [9] MICHAEL H. The mind is its own place: The influence of sustained interactivity with practitioners on educational researchers[J]. Harvard educational review, 1999(3): 289-320. [10] 陈向明, 李赛强, 方明军. 弱教育与强主体——学习者视角反馈的作用[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2024(6): 39-46. [11] [日]佐藤学. 教师花传书——专家型教师的成长[M]. 陈静静, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2016: 39, 3. [12] 钟启泉. 从学习科学看"有效学习"的本质与课题——透视课程理论发展的百年轨迹[J]. 全球教育展望, 2019(1): 35. -
下载: