Citation: | YU Hui, HU Jinsong. Private Tutoring under the "Double Reduction" Policy:Risks of Disorder and Approaches of Regulation[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (2): 29-36. |
Under the national "Double Reduction" policy, the extracurricular tutoring market is undergoing transformation from institutional training to private tutoring. At present, private tutoring is facing risks of disorder because of its informal nature, examination orientation, and profit-making orientation. Without timely regulation, the development of private tutoring might produce negative effects on the implementation of "Double Reduction" policy, such as:increasing families' financial burdens; increasing students' academic burdens; aggravating educational competitions; and damaging educational equity. The approaches of regulating private tutoring are based on the balance of state power, individual choice, and rule of education. To this end, it is important to follow three essential value principles, including maintaining legitimacy, freedom of choice, and order of educational market.
[1] |
张志勇."双减"格局下公共教育体系的重构与治理[J].中国教育学刊, 2021(09):20-26.
|
[2] |
陈先哲. "双减":中国教育改革新起点[N].光明日报, 2021-09-28(14).
|
[3] |
马陆亭,郑雪文. "双减":旨在重塑学生健康成长的教育生态[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(01):102-113.
|
[4] |
马开剑,王光明,方芳,张冉,艾巧珍,李廷洲."双减"政策下的教育理念与教育生态变革(笔谈)[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(06):1-14.
|
[5] |
周洪宇,齐彦磊."双减"政策落地:焦点、难点与建议[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(01):122-132.
|
[6] |
胡劲松.论教育公平的内在规定性及其特征[J].教育研究, 2001(08):8-12.
|
[7] |
钟景迅,赵巾慧.复杂政治角力下对多元化的坚守与反复——当前美国高等教育中肯定性行动实施回顾[J].教育发展研究, 2019, 39(21):60-68.
|
[8] |
余晖."双减"时代基础教育的公共性回归与公平性隐忧[J].南京社会科学, 2021(12):145-153.
|
[9] |
周序.家庭资本与学业焦虑——试论"双减"政策引发的家长焦虑问题[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(01):1-13.
|
[10] |
劳凯声.受教育权新论[J].教育研究, 2021, 42(08):23-34.
|
[11] |
张婷.中小学在职教师"有偿家教"问题研究[D].杭州师范大学, 2019:28-29.
|
[12] |
刘磊明.找回家庭学习活动的存在感[J].中华家教, 2021(05):90-92.
|
[13] |
刘复兴,董昕怡.实施"双减"政策的关键问题与需要处理好的矛盾关系[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(01):1-7.
|