Issue 2
Mar.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YE Yaxuan. Alterity and Common Value: The Paradigm Transformation and Value Redirection of International Understanding Education in the Age of Globalization[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (2): 56-65.
Citation: YE Yaxuan. Alterity and Common Value: The Paradigm Transformation and Value Redirection of International Understanding Education in the Age of Globalization[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (2): 56-65.

Alterity and Common Value: The Paradigm Transformation and Value Redirection of International Understanding Education in the Age of Globalization

  • Received Date: 2022-09-26
    Available Online: 2023-06-03
  • Publish Date: 2023-03-25
  • At present, the deepening of globalization makes cultural communication inevitable, while cultural differences exist objectively and inevitably. Under this background, all of the cultural subjects are facing an common significant issue. That is how to live together among diversified cultures full of heterogeneity. International understading education aims to make cultural coexisting possible through understanding cultural differences, other cultures and the interculturality. "distinction" and "strangeness" are two types of common cultural understanding paradigms which view the interculturality from the perspective of interiority and exteriority respectively. Based on this two paradigms, the international understanding education guided towards two completely different value positions of universalism and relativism respectively. However, the educational problems are hidden in both of them. While an cultural understanding paradigm of "alterity" may become an oulet for transcending "distinction" and "strangeness" and reversing the dilemma of international understanding education. The paradigm of "alterity" views intercuality in an perspective of both exteriority and ethics, establishing an inter-alterity ethical co-existing relationship with each other. To this end, international understanding education turns to a relational and generative common value standpoint, and attaches importance to constructing the common value among cultural subjects in the dialogue and communication to make the coexistence and development of multicultures possible.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    戴维·波普诺. 社会学(第10版)[M]. 李强, 等译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1999.
    [2]
    姜英敏. 从"和而不同"到"'异己'间共生"——全球化时代国际理解教育模式的新探索[J]. 比较教育研究, 2015, 37(12): 30-34.
    [3]
    孙向晨. 面对他者: 莱维纳斯哲学思想研究[M]. 上海: 上海三联书店, 2015.
    [4]
    朱利安. 间距与之间: 论中国与欧洲思想之间的哲学策略[M]. 卓立, 译. 台北: 五南图书公司, 2013.
    [5]
    朱利安. 间距与之间: 如何在当代全球化之下思考中欧之间的文化他者性[C]. //方维规. 思想与方法: 全球化时代中戏对话的可能, 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014.
    [6]
    刘擎. 重建全球想象: 从"天下"理想走向新世界主义[J]. 学术月刊, 2015, 47(8): 5-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSYK201508002.htm
    [7]
    张永义, 谌章明. 世界主义伦理观的哲学基础评析[J]. 理论探索, 2012(4): 41-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLTS201204010.htm
    [8]
    朱利安. 从存有到生活: 欧洲思想与中国思想的间距[M]. 卓立, 译. 上海: 东方出版中心, 2018.
    [9]
    亨廷顿. 文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M]. 周琪, 等译. 北京: 新华出版社, 1988.
    [10]
    吴希. 后殖民主义视域下对全球公民教育的批判与反思[J]. 比较教育研究, 2020, 42(9): 90-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJJY202009013.htm
    [11]
    杨君, 曹锦清. 全球社会的想象: 从世界社会到世界主义[J]. 社会建设, 2020, 7(4): 84-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEJS202004012.htm
    [12]
    埃马纽埃尔·列维纳斯. 从存在到存在者[M]. 吴蕙仪, 译. 江苏: 江苏教育出版社, 2006.
    [13]
    罗兰·巴特. 中性[M]. 张祖建, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2010.
    [14]
    王嘉军. 存在、异在与他者[M]. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 2019.
    [15]
    袁鑫. 当代文化哲学中的文化相对主义[J]. 教学与研究, 2019(8): 67-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JWDP201908010.htm
    [16]
    李菲, 李思萌. 人类命运共同体理念下学校价值教育内容体系构建[J]. 中国德育, 2021(15): 10-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DEYU202115005.htm
    [17]
    Melville J.H. Cultural Relativism, Perspectives in Pluralism[M]. US: Random House, 1972.
    [18]
    王嘉军. 他异和间距: 经由列维纳斯和朱利安思考文化间性[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 52(5): 106-119, 186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDSD202005012.htm
    [19]
    齐格蒙特·鲍曼. 后现代伦理学[M]. 张成岗, 译. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2003.
    [20]
    大卫·杰弗里·史密斯. 全球化与后现代教育学[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000.
    [21]
    吴攸. "间距"即对话——从弗朗索瓦·于连的多元文化观谈开去[J]. 中国比较文学, 2019(2): 30-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBJW201902004.htm
    [22]
    伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯. 总体与无限: 论外在性[M]. 朱刚, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
    [23]
    伊曼努尔·列维纳斯. 伦理与无限: 与菲利普·尼莫的对话[M]. 王士盛, 译. 江苏: 南京大学出版社, 2020.
    [24]
    朱刚. 多元与无端[M]. 江苏: 江苏人民出版社, 2016.
    [25]
    金惠敏. 差异即对话: 一份研究纲领[J]. 中国比较文学, 2016(4): 60-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBJW201604008.htm
    [26]
    UNESCO. Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education[EB/OL]. [2021-11-22]. https://unes-doc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707?3=null&queryId=28abb3be-44fa-41c8-accc-004b75d2ad95.
    [27]
    雅克·德里达. 言说事件的一种不可能新的可能性[M]. //汪民安, 郭晓彦. 事件哲学·生产. 江苏: 江苏人民出版社, 2017.
    [28]
    高德胜. 超越群体的自私[J]. 思想理论教育, 2008(11): 95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLLJ200811026.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (388) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return