Issue 1
Feb.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LYU Keyi, CHENG Hao. Follow up: Understanding the Migrant Parents' Participation in Home-School Collaboration[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2026, (1): 86-98.
Citation: LYU Keyi, CHENG Hao. Follow up: Understanding the Migrant Parents' Participation in Home-School Collaboration[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2026, (1): 86-98.

Follow up: Understanding the Migrant Parents' Participation in Home-School Collaboration

  • Received Date: 2025-09-20
    Available Online: 2026-03-18
  • Publish Date: 2026-02-01
  • Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted at S Primary School in Y County—one of Z Province's top 100 industrial counties—this study examines the practical logic through which migrant parents engage in home–school collaboration (HSC hereafter). Findings show three distinct stages of interaction. In the pre-interaction stage, parents' rural upbringing, migrant work trajectories, and everyday childrearing practices foster a strong orientation of trust toward public schools and teachers. In the stage of institutional interaction, parents tend to comply with school rules rather than challenge them. They seek to embed themselves in school life through strategies such as physical presence and meaning-oriented engagement. In informal interactions, parents' sincerity and willingness to share personal experiences elicit teachers' empathy and reinforce their sense of professional duty. These dynamics jointly contribute to the formation of high-quality home–school relationships. The study advances the interpretive concept of "follow up" to illuminate how socioeconomically disadvantaged families, despite limited resources, actively align themselves with school expectations. This concept underscores both parents' proactive agency and the generative mechanisms of educational power that emerge from the lower end of the social hierarchy." The study concludes by calling for greater recognition of migrant parents' participatory potentials and for strengthening home–school collaboration as a mechanism of empowerment for migrant families.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国教育部. 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[EB/OL]. (2020-11-03)[2025-12-04]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/202011/t20201104_498130.html.
    [2]
    教育部等十三部门. 关于健全学校家庭社会协同育人机制的意见[EB/OL]. (2023-01-13)[2025-12-04]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/202301/t20230119_1039746.html.
    [3]
    韩嘉玲, 张妍, 冯思澈, 等. 新形势下中国流动儿童教育的现状、趋势与挑战(2021-2022)[M]. 韩嘉玲, 中国流动儿童教育发展报告(2021-2022). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2022: 1-25.
    [4]
    Yu H. The making of 'incompetent parents': intersectional identity, habitus and Chinese rural migrant's parental educational involvement[J]. The australian educational researcher, 2019, 47(4): 555-570.
    [5]
    沈洪成. 激活优势: 家长主义浪潮下家长参与的群体差异[J]. 社会, 2020, 40(2), 168-203.
    [6]
    李家成, 王娟, 陈忠贤, 等. 可怜天下父母心——进城务工随迁子女家长教育理解、教育期待与教育参与的调查报告[J]. 教育科学研究, 2015(01): 5-18.
    [7]
    Lyu K, Zhong C. Self-selection or self-disqualification? Chinese rural-to-urban migrant parents' involvement imaginaries in home-school interaction[J]. International journal of educational research, 2023, 122: 102266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102266
    [8]
    吕珂漪, 钟程. 缺席的在场: 一项针对流动家长参与家校互动的田野考察[J]. 教育学报, 2025, 21(6): 136-150.
    [9]
    王欧. 家庭化与新生代农民工生活方式转型[J]. 社会学研究, 2022, 37(01): 68-89+227-228.
    [10]
    Peng Y. Migrant mothering in transition: A qualitative study of the maternal narratives and practices of two generations of rural-urban migrant mothers in southern China[J]. Sex roles, 2018, 79(1): 16-35.
    [11]
    Bourdieu P. The forms of capital[M]. Mark G, Richard S. Eds. The sociology of economic life. London: Routledge, 2018: 78-92.
    [12]
    拉鲁, 家庭优势: 社会阶层与家长参与[M]. 吴重涵, 熊苏春, 张俊, 译. 南昌: 江西教育出版社, 2014.
    [13]
    拉鲁, 不平等的童年: 阶级、种族与家庭生活[M]. 宋爽, 张旭, 译, 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011.
    [14]
    Epstein J L. Theory to practice: School and family partnerships lead to school improvement and student success[A]. School, family and community interaction[C]. London: Routledge, 2019: 39-52.
    [15]
    吴重涵, 张俊. 制度化家校合作的内在动力、行动逻辑与实践路径——基于十年家校合作实验的回顾与反思[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2021(09): 68-75.
    [16]
    Calarco J M C.?Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [17]
    Brantlinger E. Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage[M]. London: Routledge, 2013.
    [18]
    肖索未, 蔡永芳. 儿童抚养与进城务工农民的城市社会文化调试[J]. 开放时代, 2014(04): 183-193+9-10.
    [19]
    谢爱磊. 农村学校家长参与的低迷现象研究——专业主义、不平等关系与家校区隔[J]. 全球教育展望, 2020, 49(03): 42-56.
    [20]
    李强. 当代中国社会分层[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2019: 136.
    [21]
    吉登斯. 社会的构成[M]. 李康, 李猛, 译. 上海: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1998.
    [22]
    王占魁. "老师"内涵的去道德化与教育者社会形象的重建[J]. 南京社会科学, 2015(08): 136-141.
    [23]
    乔文俊, 王毅杰. 农民工政府信任及其影响因素——基于南京市的调查[J]. 经济问题, 2015(12): 103-108.
    [24]
    翟学伟. 信任的本质及其文化[J]. 社会, 2014, 34(01): 1-26.
    [25]
    Dastur F. Derrida and the question of presence[J]. Research in phenomenology, 2006, 36(1): 45-62. doi: 10.1163/156916406779165854
    [26]
    凯博文. 照护: 哈佛医师和阿尔茨海默病妻子的十年[M]. 姚灏, 译. 北京: 中信出版社. 2020: 7.
    [27]
    Bæck U D K. 'We are the professionals': a study of teachers' views on parental involvement in school[J]. British journal of sociology of education, 2010, 31(3): 323-335. doi: 10.1080/01425691003700565
    [28]
    诺丁斯. 关心: 伦理和道德教育的女性路径[M]. 武芸斐, 译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2014.
    [29]
    康永久. 作为一种教育意向的善[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2020, (03): 1-11.
    [30]
    陆扬. "情感转向"的理论资源[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 34(01): 30-38.
    [31]
    董轩, 何梦蕊. 感同身受: 教育民族志方法的情感向度[J]. 教育学报, 2020, 16(01): 27-33.
    [32]
    姬甜甜, 孙丽萍. 合作中的困扰: 教师视角下家师关系的现实困境及超越——基于对北京市80位小学教师的访谈分析[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2021(05): 101-108.
    [33]
    康永久, 程猛. 洞察、文化生产与循规——对威利斯《学做工》的再审视[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2021(05): 1-11.
    [34]
    Crozier G, Davies J. Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home—school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents[J]. British educational research journal, 2007, 33(3): 295-313. doi: 10.1080/01411920701243578
    [35]
    陆铭. 向心城市: 迈向未来的活力、宜居与和谐[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2022: 12.
    [36]
    陈彬莉, 李英华, 袁丽. 阶层、流动与反思: 流动人口家庭教养实践的多重逻辑[J]. 教育学报, 2021, 17(03): 117-131.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (5) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return