Issue 3
Jul.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YU Bin, ZHANG Lan. The Transitions of Chinese University Teachers Performance Culture Since 1949: A Policy Tex Analysis[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2020, (3): 51-58.
Citation: YU Bin, ZHANG Lan. The Transitions of Chinese University Teachers Performance Culture Since 1949: A Policy Tex Analysis[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2020, (3): 51-58.

The Transitions of Chinese University Teachers Performance Culture Since 1949: A Policy Tex Analysis

  • Received Date: 2020-04-01
    Available Online: 2021-07-16
  • Since 1949, the transition of university teachers performance culture had gone through four stages: preliminary exploration period, institutional norm alization period, reform deepening period and connotation upgrading period. The development trajectories were shaped by triple logical evolution, including: from equalitarianism to more payment for more work and good payment for good work; insisting on guiding teachers to focus on teaching ; from performance oriented to paying equal attention to performance and virtue. In the future, it is necessary to guide the development of university teachers performance culture with leading policy texts.The aim is to develop high-quality performance material culture, teaching and research oriented performance behavior culture, and performance spiritual culture following the doctrine of the mean, so as to improve teachers’ work enthusiasm, to establish a positive university organizational image, and to enhance the recognition and trust of the society to the university.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    马林诺斯基. 科学的文化理论[M]. 黄建波, 等,译. 北京:中央民族大学出版社,1999:1.
    [2]
    Mich Mills,Adrienne E.Hyle. Faculty Evaluation:A Prickly Pair[J]. Higher Education, 1999, 38(3):351-371.
    [3]
    曹叔亮. 台湾应用科技大学的绩效评价指标体系及启示[J]. 职业技术教育,2019,40(33):70-75.
    [4]
    史万兵, 杨慧. 高等学校教师科研绩效评价方法研究[J]. 高教探索,2014(6):112-117.
    [5]
    李倩, 刘大为. 高校教学绩效评价主体与评价内容选择[J]. 郑州铁路职业技术学院学报,2015, 27(3):112-113

    +116.
    [6]
    冉景亮, 杨晓宇. 绩效文化视角下的企业软实力构建[J]. 四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2010,25(5):92-95.
    [7]
    卡扎米亚斯, 马西亚拉斯. 教育的传统与变革[M]. 福建师范大学教育系, 译. 北京:文化教育出版社,1981:231.
    [8]
    高奇.中国高等教育思想史[M]. 北京:人民教育出版社,1992:401.
    [9]
    史万兵. 提高高校教师绩效的理论与方法研究[M]. 长春:东北大学出版社,2016:5.
    [10]
    Frank W.Shaw. A Summary of Legal Implications of Teacher Evaluations for Merit Pay and a Model Plan[J]. Educational Administration Quarterly,1985,21(1):51-69.
    [11]
    阎光才. 高校教师聘任制度改革的轨迹、问题与未来去向[J]. 中国高教研究,2019(10):1-9+19.
    [12]
    刘丽娜, 杜艳秋, 罗玉萍. 大学教师教学评价:发展逻辑、体系构成及多元协同[J]. 江苏高教, 2018(1):44-48.
    [13]
    Stephan Gerhard Huber, Guri Skedsmo. Teacher Evaluation Accountability and Improving Teaching Practices[J].Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,2016(28):105-109.
    [14]
    糜海波. 新时代师德评价与师德建设的应有维度[J]. 伦理学研究,2018(2):117-123.
    [15]
    Gerald S.Leventhal. What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships[J]. Social Exchange Advances in Theory & Research, 1980(2):27-55.
    [16]
    刘振天. 教学与科研内在属性差异及高校回归教学本位之可能[J]. 中国高教研究,2017(6);18-25.
    [17]
    吴绍芬. 大学"教学学术" 内涵与路径求索[J]. 江苏高教,2012(6):74-77.
    [18]
    周光礼, 马海泉. 教学学术能力:大学教师发展与评价的新框架[J]. 教育研究,2013,34(8):37-47.
    [19]
    Roz Collins,Adam Palmer. Perceptions of Rewarding Excellence in Teaching:Motivation and the Scholarship of Teaching[J]. Journal of Further and Higher Education,2006(2):193-205.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (281) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return