Issue 1
Feb.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LU Litao, LIU Keming, WENG Yuxuan. The Generation Mechanism of Learning Experience in Graduate Course Learning Communities[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2026, (1): 61-74.
Citation: LU Litao, LIU Keming, WENG Yuxuan. The Generation Mechanism of Learning Experience in Graduate Course Learning Communities[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2026, (1): 61-74.

The Generation Mechanism of Learning Experience in Graduate Course Learning Communities

  • Received Date: 2025-05-27
    Available Online: 2026-03-18
  • Publish Date: 2026-02-01
  • Enhancing the learning experience of graduate students in course learning communities is conducive to improving the quality of graduate courses. This study takes the graduate course "Qualitative Research" taught by Teacher L at School B as the research field. By using in-depth interviews and observation methods to delve into the learning context of the course learning community, the study, through the path of grounded theory, extracts seven influencing factors of graduate students' learning experience in the course learning community and constructs the generation mechanism of learning experience in the course learning community. There is a bidirectional interaction between the internal cognitive and attitudinal factors of individuals and the external course environment in the course learning community, which in turn affects the explicit action strategies of individuals or groups. The generation mechanism of learning experience in the course learning community is the transformation from individual to group cognition and attitude (knowledge) and behavioral strategies (action) under the influence of the course environment. Based on the two dimensions of group cognition and attitude (knowledge) and group action strategies (action), the course learning community is divided into four action types: knowledge and action both in harmony, knowledge in harmony but action not, action in harmony but knowledge not, and neither knowledge nor action in harmony, corresponding to high, medium, and low levels of learning experience. Through environmental improvement, individual adjustment, and group interaction, the learning experience of graduate students in the course learning community can be enhanced.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    教育部. 教育部关于中央部门所属高校深化教育教学改革的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2016-07-04)[2024-09-30]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201607/t20160718_272133.html.
    [2]
    中共中央国务院. 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[N]. 中国教育报, 2010-07-31(01).
    [3]
    陈恬. 从合作学习小组到学习共同体——语文课堂学习途径的转变[J]. 江苏教育研究, 2016(25): 37-40.
    [4]
    钟志贤. 知识建构、学习共同体与互动概念的理解[J]. 电化教育研究, 2005(11): 20-24+29.
    [5]
    裘伟廷. 网络教育中的虚拟学习共同体[J]. 现代远距离教育, 2005(5): 67-70.
    [6]
    屠锦红. "学习共同体": 理论价值与实践困境[J]. 当代教育科学, 2013(16): 7-9+34.
    [7]
    范玉凤, 李欣. 活动理论视角下的虚拟学习共同体构建研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2013(2): 43-47.
    [8]
    王陆. 虚拟学习社区的社会网络分析[J]. 中国电化教育, 2009(2): 5-11.
    [9]
    郑葳, 李芒. 学习共同体及其生成[J]. 全球教育展望, 2007(4): 57-62.
    [10]
    雷云. 社会互赖理论视角下博士研究生协作—学习共同体的构建研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2018(8): 27-30.
    [11]
    李军靠, 丁一鑫, 乔刚. "互联网+"环境下硕士研究生教育导生学习共同体构建[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2020(4): 41-46.
    [12]
    王福胜, 刘少雪. 互联网对博士生学习共同体的影响研究[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2011(4): 32-39.
    [13]
    彭雪. 英语课程学习共同体的内涵、要素及建构[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2020(3): 48-53.
    [14]
    邵龙宝. "学习共同体"与创新人格的培养——《思想道德修养》课程建设的实践与思考[J]. 教育研究, 2007(1): 90-93.
    [15]
    卢强. 学习共同体内涵重审: 课程教学的视域[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2013(3): 44-50.
    [16]
    文军萍, 陈晓端. 超越课堂: 课程学习共同体的建构[J]. 课程·教材· 教法, 2017(4): 42-48.
    [17]
    李英. 体验: 一种教育学的话语[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2001(12): 1-5.
    [18]
    薛清梅. 课堂参与、学业表现和学习体验——基于会计硕士专业课程的实验研究[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2015(5): 23-28.
    [19]
    黄天慧, 牛新春. 本科生满意度、绩点和深度学习体验关系探究——基于一所研究型大学的实证研究[J]. 高教探索, 2017(9), 45-49+54.
    [20]
    吴筱萌, 雍文静, 代良, 等. 基于Coursera课程模式的在线课程学生体验研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2014(6): 11-17.
    [21]
    张梅琳, 黄丹. 基于MOOC学习体验的在线课程设计分析[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2015(15): 38-42.
    [22]
    李葆萍, 傅骞, 淮瑞英, 等. 1对1学习环境中的师生感知研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2015(11): 110-115.
    [23]
    Xie K, Debacker T K, Ferguson C. Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: the role of student motivation[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 2006, 34(1): 67-89. doi: 10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6
    [24]
    陈向明. 扎根理论的思路和方法[J]. 教育研究与实验, 1999(4): 58-63+73.
    [25]
    孙广勇. 课程环境因素及其对课程改革的影响[J]. 教育探索, 2006(1): 20-22.
    [26]
    Xue H, Lu K, Hao N. Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair[J]. Neuroimage, 2018, 172: 527-537. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.007
    [27]
    Barron B. Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups[J]. The journal of the learning sciences, 2000, 9(4): 403-436. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
    [28]
    Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Science [M]. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1951: 67.
    [29]
    孙晓敏. 群体动力[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2017: 13.
    [30]
    让·梅松纳夫. 群体动力学[M]. 殷世才, 孙兆通, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997: 20-26.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (86) PDF downloads(24) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return