Issue 2
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SUN Fuhai. On the Teacher Role Reconstruction in the Context of Embodied AI Participation[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2025, (2): 36-46.
Citation: SUN Fuhai. On the Teacher Role Reconstruction in the Context of Embodied AI Participation[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2025, (2): 36-46.

On the Teacher Role Reconstruction in the Context of Embodied AI Participation

  • Received Date: 2024-09-12
    Available Online: 2025-05-28
  • Publish Date: 2025-04-25
  • As a practical application of artificial intelligence in education, AI teacher essentially follows a disembodied intelligence cognitive approach, which face inherent limitations in fostering authentic epistemic engagement to generate genuine cognitive interaction and knowledge. Addressing these constraints, Rodney Brooks proposes integrating morphological intelligence with environmental affordances into robotic systems, thereby establishing a novel implementation framework to transcend disembodied limitations. Through analyzing four prototypical human-AI co-teaching models, this study reveals the evolving role of human educators. As pedagogical orchestrators, they curate instructional ecosystems while AI systems provide precise teaching support and personalized services; as collaborators, they design and implement teaching activities jointly with AI agents; as metacognitive supervisors, they primarily supervise and guide AI-led teaching processes, ensuring teaching quality and timely intervention; as adaptive counterparts, they demonstrate cognitive interoperability with autonomous AI systems. This demonstrates that AI has evolved beyond its inherent tool attributes to become an autonomous classroom participant, generating a new hybrid intelligent teaching model based on human-machine complementarity.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Elliott, A. The culture of AI: Everyday life and the digital revolution[M]. New York: Routledge. 2019: 15-16.
    [2]
    Bryson, J. J. & Theodorou, A. How society can maintain human-centric artificial intelligence[J]. Human-centered digitalization and services, 2019: 305-323.
    [3]
    Kim, Y., Soyata, T. & Behnagh, R. F. Towards emotionally aware AI smart classroom: Current issues and directions for engineering and education[C]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 5308-5331.
    [4]
    Underwood, J. Exploring AI language assistants with primary EFL students[C]. CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions–short papers from EUROCALL, 2017: 317-321.
    [5]
    Han, J. Emerging technologies: robot assisted language learning[J]. Language learning and technology. 2012, 16(3): 1-9.
    [6]
    Shilling, C. The body and social theory (3rd edition)[M]. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2012: 96-97.
    [7]
    Birke, L. Bodies and biology[C]. Feminist theory and the body: A reader. New York: Routledge. 1999: 42-49.
    [8]
    Heimann, M. & Hübener, A. F. AI as Social Actor: A Lacanian Investigation into Social Technology[J]. Journal of digital social research. 2023, 5(1), 48-69. doi: 10.33621/jdsr.v5i1.159
    [9]
    Franks, D. D. Neurosociology: Fundamentals and current findings[M]. Springer. 2019: 43-45.
    [10]
    Leyzberg, D. Spaulding, S., Toneva, M. & Scassellati, B. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains[C]. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. 2012, 34(34): 1882-1887.
    [11]
    Baidoo-Anu, D. & Ansah, L. O. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning[J]. Journal of AI. 2023, 7(1), 52-62. doi: 10.61969/jai.1337500
    [12]
    Wang, J., Liu, T. & Wang, X. Human hand gesture recognition with convolutional neural networks for K-12 double-teachers instruction mode classroom[J]. Infrared physics & technology. 2020, 111: 1-7.
    [13]
    Schein, E. H. & Van Maanen, J. Career anchors and job/role planning[J]. Organizational dynamics, 2016, 45(3): 165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.07.002
    [14]
    Panova, O. B. Spirit and language in Hegel's philosophy of absolute spirit[J]. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 2015, 200: 502-508. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.008
    [15]
    Battestin, M. C. Sterne among the Philosophes: Body and Soul in A Sentimental Journey[J]. Eighteenth-Century fiction, 1994, 7(1), 17-36. doi: 10.1353/ecf.1994.0015
    [16]
    Lior, A. AI entities as AI agents: Artificial intelligence liability and the AI Respondeat Superior Analogy[J]. Mitchell hamline law review, 2020, 46(5): 1044-1100.
    [17]
    Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search[C]. In ACM Turing award lectures. 1975, 19(3): 113-126.
    [18]
    Barsalou, L. W. Grounded cognition[J]. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008, 59: 617-645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    [19]
    Zhang, C. & Lu, Y. Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects[J]. Journal of industrial information integration. 2021, 23: 1-9.
    [20]
    Li, J. & He, J. Research on AI-Assisted Teaching Mode for English Teaching from the Embodied Cognitive Perspective[C]. In International Conference on Innovative Computing. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 2022: 294-299.
    [21]
    Shin, J., Chen, F., Lu, C., & Bulut, O. Analyzing students' performance in computerized formative assessments to optimize teachers' test administration decisions using deep learning frameworks[J]. Journal of computers in education. 2022, 9(1): 71-91. doi: 10.1007/s40692-021-00196-7
    [22]
    Mutasa, S., Sun, S., & Ha, R. Understanding artificial intelligence-based radiology studies: What is overfitting?[J]. Clinical imaging. 2020, 65: 96-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.025
    [23]
    Brooks, R. A. Intelligence without representation[J]. Artificial intelligence. 1991, 47(1-3), 139-159. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M
    [24]
    Zebrowski, R. In Dialogue with the World: Merleau-Ponty, Rodney Brooks and Embodied Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of consciousness studies. 2010, 17(7-8): 156-172.
    [25]
    Kozma, R. & Freeman, W. J. Cognitive phase transitions in the cerebral cortex-enhancing the neuron doctrine by modeling neural fields[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 2016: 6.
    [26]
    Padmakumar, A. Thomason, J., Shrivastava, A., et al. Teach: Task-driven embodied agents that chat[C]. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2022, 36(2): 2017-2025.
    [27]
    Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. What is agency?[J]. American journal of sociology, 1998, 103(4): 962-1023. doi: 10.1086/231294
    [28]
    Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. The extended mind[J]. Analysis. 1998, 58(1): 7-19. doi: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
    [29]
    Leyzberg D, Spaulding S, Toneva M, et al. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains[C] //Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. 2012, 34(34): 1882-1887.
    [30]
    Du Boulay, B. Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant[J]. IEEE intelligent systems. 2016, 31(6): 76-81. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2016.93
    [31]
    Floridi, L. The ethics of information[M]. New York: Oxford University Press. 2013.
    [32]
    Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. The ethics of artificial intelligence[M]. New York: The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. 2018.
    [33]
    Moor, J. H. The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics[J]. IEEE intelligent systems, 2006, 21(4), 18-21. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2006.80
    [34]
    Arshinov, V., Chapny, E. & Chekletsov, V. Intersubjectivity and Complexity in Human Enhancement Problem[C]. In Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy. 2018, 3: 11-13.
    [35]
    Kim, Y., Soyata, T. & Behnagh, R. F. Towards emotionally aware AI smart classroom: Current issues and directions for engineering and education[C]. IEEE Access. 2018, 6: 5308-5331.
    [36]
    Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Westerman, D., et al. Initial expectations, interactions, and beyond with social robots[J]. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019, 90: 308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.042
    [37]
    Holstein, K. & Aleven, V. Designing for human–AI complementarity in K-12 education[J]. AI Magazine. 2022, 43(2), 239-248. doi: 10.1002/aaai.12058
    [38]
    Wiener, N. Some Moral and Technical Consequences of Automation: As machines learn they may develop unforeseen strategies at rates that baffle their programmers[J]. Science, 1960, 131(3410): 1355-1358. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3410.1355
    [39]
    Fuhai S, Ruixing Y. Moral Status Consideration of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Science & Education. 2021, 32: 1-17.
    [40]
    Borgmann A. So who am I really? Personal identity in the age of the Internet[J]. AI & Society. 2013, 28: 15-20.
    [41]
    Featherstone, M. & Turner, B. S. Body & society: An introduction[J]. Body & Society. 1995, 1(1): 1-12.
    [42]
    曾文婕, 周子仪. 从"育分"到"育人"——中国式教育评价现代化道路探析[J]. 现代教育论丛, 2023(2): 86-92. http://xdjylc.scnu.edu.cn/article/id/11945bc5-d0f3-4b93-8919-4c1f592e84a7
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (8) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return