A Cultural Interpretation of the Development of University Students' Self-leadership
-
摘要: 自我领导力关乎大学生发展，也关乎高等教育立德树人使命的实现。文化传统对自我领导力发展具有涵养、化育、引领和形塑的影响，从宏观到微观的文化背景也构成自我领导力发展的总体基底、中间环节和实践场域。不同文化下，自我领导力在主体结构、主体间关系、行动逻辑和价值取向四个维度呈现出不同特点。自我领导文化是在组织引导下通过个体自我领导力实践的外化而逐步形成的一种文化形态，对个人和组织都具有重要意义。促进大学生发展、推动高等教育实现立德树人使命，需要从课程设计、评价体系和支持体系三个层面打通课内外教育教学场域，建构大学生自我领导文化。Abstract: Self-leadership concerns not only the development of university students, but also the realization of higher education's fundamental task to foster virtue and nurture a new generation of capable young people. Cultural traditions have nurturing, educational, guiding, and shaping influences on the development of self-leadership, while cultural contexts from the macro to the micro levels also form the overall foundation, intermediate context, and practical setting for the development of self-leadership. Self-leadership displays different characteristics across four dimensions in different cultural contexts: subject structure, intersubjective relationships, action logic, and value orientation. Self-leadership culture is a form of culture that gradually develops through the externalization of individuals' self-leadership practices under organizational guidance, and it is of great significance to both individuals and organizations. To promote the development of university students and advance higher education's fundamental task, it's necessary to connect curricular and extracurricular educational fields across three dimensions: curriculum design, evaluation systems, and support systems, building self-leadership culture among university students.
-
表 1 自我领导力的不同类型及主要特点
维度 类型 主要特点 主体结构 独立型/关系型 独立的自我；关系中的自我 主体间关系 竞争型/合作型 以竞争为主；以合作为主 行动逻辑 外倾型/内倾型 积极表达，外向交流；注重调和，内向克制 价值取向 自我实现型/共同责任型 重视个人的成就；重视对共同体的贡献 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 黎娟娟, 黎文华. Z世代大学生多重矛盾性社会心态解析[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(7): 104-110+30. [2] 沈杰. Z世代: 时代与社会多重规定性的建构[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(8): 5-13. [3] Manz C C. Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations[J]. The academy of management review, 1986(3): 585-600. [4] Prussia G E, Anderson J S, Manz C C. Self-leadership and performance outcomes: the mediating influence of self-efficacy[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 1998(5): 523-538. [5] Neck C P, Houghton J D. Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: past developments, present trends, and future possibilities[J]. Journal of managerial psychology, 2006(5): 270-295. [6] Manz, C C, Sims H P. Self-management as a substitute for leadership: a social learning theory perspective[J]. The academy of management review, 1980(3): 361-367. [7] Neck C P, Manz C C Mastering self-leadership: empowering yourself for personal excellence [M]. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007: 45-61. [8] Neck C P, Manz C C. Thought self-leadership: the influence of self-talk and mental imagery on performance[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 1992(7): 681-699. [9] Neck C P, Manz C C. Thought self-leadership: the impact of mental strategies training on employee behavior, cognition and emotion[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 1996(5): 445-467. [10] Bryant A, Kazan A L. Self-leadership: how to become a more successful, efficient and effective leader from the inside out[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2013. [11] 赵国祥, 梁瀚中. 国外自我领导研究的现状述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011 04): 589-598. [12] 娜仁, 刘洪. 自我领导理论视角下的员工成长途径研究[J]. 软科学, 2011 (3): 95-99. [13] 项贤明. "五育"何以"融合"[J]. 教育研究, 2024 (1): 41-51. [14] 陈理宣, 姜若梅. "五育融合"的发展历程、现实困境与实践对策[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2024 (03): 121-125. [15] 赵聪环, 周作宇. 论大学生的自我领导力教育[J]. 大学教育科学, 2017(2): 97-103+127. [16] 周作宇. 自我领导的教育哲学[J]. 大学教育科学, 2013(4): 3-6. [17] 张华. 论核心素养的内涵[J]. 全球教育展望, 2016 (4): 10-24. [18] 核心素养研究课题组. 中国学生发展核心素养[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2016(10): 1-3. [19] Astin A W. Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education[J]. Journal of college student development, 1984(40): 518-529. [20] 胡映兰. 论乡土文化的变迁[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2013(6): 94-101. [21] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 北京: 北京出版社, 2016. [22] 薛焱. 当代中国主流文化认同研究[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2016: 39-40. [23] 邹广文. 当代中国大众文化及其生成背景[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2001(2): 46-53+67. [24] 胡启恒. 互联网精神[J]. 科学与社会, 2013 (4): 1-13+42. [25] 勾彦殳. 虚拟异托邦: 论当代大众文化的受众快感机制及其接受效果[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022 (4): 43-51. [26] 赵雪, 韩升. 数字时代大众文化的审美隐忧与解决路径[J]. 理论探索, 2021(6): 25-31. [27] Bronfenbrenner U, Morris P A. The bioecological model of human development[M]//R M Lerner, W Damon. Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development(6th ed). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2006: 793-828. [28] 韦伯. 新教伦理与资本主义精神[M]. 刘作宾译. 北京: 作家出版社, 2017: 60. [29] 张凤琦. "地域文化"概念及其研究路径探析[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2008(4): 63-66+50+127. [30] 费孝通. 对文化的历史性和社会性的思考[J]. 思想战线, 2004(2): 1-6. [31] 周作宇. 大学治理的文化基础: 价值坐标与行动选择[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2021 (6): 1-20. [32] 张杰, 丁玥. 自主个体与关系自我的创造性转化——"躺平青年"与新个体文化的建构[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(6): 93-105+171-172. [33] 郭湛. 论主体间性或交互主体性[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2001(3): 32-38. [34] 孙杰远. 智能化时代的文化变异与教育应对[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2019(4): 3-10. [35] 周国梅, 傅小兰. 分布式认知——一种新的认知观点[J]. 心理科学进展, 2002(2): 147-153. [36] 赵聪环, 周作宇, 杜瑞军. 论大学治理的领导力基础[J]. 中国高教研究, 2017(12): 49-55. [37] Pedlera M. Guide to the learning organization[J]. Industrial and commercial training, 1995 (4): 21-25. [38] 周作宇. 教育: 文化与人的互动[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 1999(4): 26-31. [39] 周作宇. 论教育评价的治理功能及其自反性立场[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021 (8): 1-19. -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 8
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0