An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in "Double First-class" Universities

CHEN Jieting; CAI Wenbo

Issue 2

Apr. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Modern Education > 2024 > (2): 67-78

CHEN Jieting, CAI Wenbo. An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in 'Double First-class' Universities[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2024, (2): 67-78.

Citation:

CHEN Jieting, CAI Wenbo. An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in "Double First-class" Universities[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2024, (2): 67-78.

CHEN Jieting, CAI Wenbo. An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in 'Double First-class' Universities[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2024, (2): 67-78.

Citation:

CHEN Jieting, CAI Wenbo. An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in "Double First-class" Universities[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2024, (2): 67-78.

PDF( 1586 KB)

An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in "Double First-class" Universities

CHEN Jieting^{1, 2},
CAI Wenbo^{1, 3
,
,}

1.
College of Education Science, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumchi 830017, Xinjiang, China
2.
Medicine College, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
3.
Normal College, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China

Received Date: 2023-10-19
Available Online: 2024-05-11
Publish Date: 2024-04-25

Abstract

Abstract

The evaluation of discipline construction in "Double First-class" universities is an effective policy tool to promote national strategic goals and strive for world-class schools. Combined with the main problems existing in the construction of "Double First-class" at the current stage as well as the new requirements and new concepts of educational reform in the new era, the evaluation system of discipline construction takes the "triple helix" innovation practice theory as the theoretical framework from four dimensions: talent training, scientific research, teacher team construction and social service. Based on the cross-sectional data of discipline construction in 122 "Double First-class" universities in China in 2020, the overall level and corresponding rankings of discipline construction evaluation of 122 universities were obtained by using clustering method, entropy weight method, factor analysis, advantage and disadvantage solution distance method and partial least squares structural equation model. According to the cluster analysis and comprehensive ranking, the universities were divided into three types: "leading", "parallel" and "following", accounting for 43.5%, 42.6% and 13.9% respectively. To provide a theoretical basis for the dynamic adjustment mechanism of disciplines in "Double First-class" universities, by actively constructing a diversified performance evaluation system for universities, society, government and market, the research broadens the interaction and cross-sharing research fields between disciplines and social needs, builds a favorable ecological environment for discipline development, and guides universities and disciplines to lead the world.
- "Double First-class" colleges and universities,
- Performance evaluation results,
- Performance evaluation types

FullText(HTML)

References(37)

References

[1]	中华人民共和国国务院. 国务院关于印发统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案的通知[EB/OL]. (2015-11-11)[2018-06-01]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-11/05/content_10269.htm.
[2]	中华人民共和国教育部, 财政部, 国家发展改革委. 国家发展改革委关于公布世界一流大学和一流学科建设高校及建设学科名单的通知[EB/OL]. (2017-09-21)[2018-06-01]. http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/Z22/moe_843/201709/t20170921_314942.html.
[3]	曹妍, 唐珊珊, 荀渊. 项目制背景下激励机制对高校SSCI科研产出的影响研究: 基于2014—2018年36所"双一流"建设高校的面板数据分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022 (7): 85-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDXK202207007.htm
[4]	杜瑛. 我国"双一流"建设实施绩效评价面临的困境与行动路径[J]. 教育发展研究, 2020(3): 22-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHGJ202003008.htm
[5]	钟秉林, 王新凤. 我国"双一流"建设成效评价的若干思考[J]. 高校教育管理, 2020(4): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSK202004003.htm
[6]	周光礼, 蔡三发, 徐贤春, 王顶明. 世界一流大学的建设与评价: 国际经验与中国探索[J]. 中国高教研究, 2019(9): 22-28+34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGJ201909005.htm
[7]	孙科技, 朱益明. "双一流"建设评估的现实困境及其超越: 第四代评估理论视角[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2021, (4): 100-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2021.04.015
[8]	梅雄杰, 李志峰. 本体与模式: "双一流"建设评价体系研究述评[J]. 现代大学教育, 2018(2): 76-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1610.2018.02.012
[9]	张敏. "双一流"建设的国际经验与中国方略[J]. 江苏高教, 2016(6): 60-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSGJ201606013.htm
[10]	亨利·埃茨科威兹. 三螺旋[M]. 周春彦, 译. 北京: 东方出版社, 2005: 6.
[11]	邹波, 周文萱, 卜琳华. "三螺旋"创新协同效应理论分析[J]. 学术交流, 2013(11): 111-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8284.2013.11.025
[12]	张海滨, 陈笃彬. 基于三螺旋理论的高校支撑区域创新体系评价研究[J]. 东南学术, 2012(1): 181-189. . https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXS201201021.htm
[13]	DUNN D D. Accountability, Democratic Theory, and Higher Education[J]. Educational Policy, 2003(17): 60-79.
[14]	蔡三发, 任士雷, 王倩. "双一流"建设背景下学科可持续发展度评价指标体系构建[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2020 (2): 86-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWZX202002015.htm
[15]	王战军, 杨旭婷. 世界一流学科建设评价的理念变革与要素创新[J]. 中国高教研究, 2019(3): 7-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGJ201903002.htm
[16]	李立国, 张海生. "双一流"学科建设与社会需求的反差现象及评价的逻辑转向[J]. 大学教育科学, 2022(1): 12-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXGJ202201002.htm
[17]	叶前林, 李佳倩, 刘海玉. 中部欠发达地区高校一流学科建设成效: 量质评价与路径优化[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2023 (8): 58-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJG202308009.htm
[18]	叶前林, 刘海玉, 李佳倩. 江西高校一流学科建设成效评价与提升路径[J]. 中国高校科技, 2023(4): 8-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKC202304002.htm
[19]	徐自超. 基于ESI和InCites数据库高校学科建设水平评价: 以河南省高校为例[J]. 河南社会科学, 2022(10): 116-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSH202210013.htm
[20]	李兴国, 刘毳, 梁丽肖. 河北省"双一流"高校学科建设绩效评价与发展策略[J]. 山东高等教育, 2020 (3): 1-9+101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LGJY202003002.htm
[21]	路亮, 陈永法. "双一流"建设下我国药学学科的科研竞争力水平评价: 来自48家高校院所的实证[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022(20): 71-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGL202220009.htm
[22]	殷朝晖, 刘子涵. "双一流"建设背景下交叉学科研究的非学术影响评价[J]. 教育发展研究, 2021(9): 21-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHGJ202109005.htm
[23]	吴冠平. 浅谈影视艺术学科的学术评价体系建设[J]. 北京电影学院学报, 2006(1): 81-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BDYX200601016.htm
[24]	张倩倩, 肖启强, 王颖等. 公立医院临床医学工程学科建设评价指标体系构建与分析[J]. 中国医院, 2023 (4): 62-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYU202304017.htm
[25]	刘雪立, 周晶, 盖双双. C9高校学科建设的绩效评价与预测: 基于ESI和InCites数据库[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2016(5): 130-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKT201605020.htm
[26]	邱均平, 欧玉芳. 面向世界一流大学建设的"985工程"高校科研竞争力评价分析: 基于"十二五"期间RCCSE世界一流大学及学科竞争力评价报告[J]. 中国高教研究, 2016(4): 57-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGJ201604010.htm
[27]	李明, 吴晓园. 地方高校研究生学位授权学科建设的评价指标体系[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011 (5): 103-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZDS201105021.htm
[28]	张晓文, 赵普, 纪爱兵. 基于直觉模糊集的世界一流学科建设成效评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021 (6): 205-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YCGL202106031.htm
[29]	MENGYAO CUI. Introduction to the K-Means Clusteringalgorithm based on the elbow method[J]. Account-ing, Auditing and Finance, 2020(1): 5—8.
[30]	] 邓三鸿, 陈超群, 王昊, 张越. 基于组合赋权法的高校网络影响力综合评价: 以"双一流"高校为例[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2019(9): 227-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNZS201909034.htm
[31]	江燕燕. 跨期视角下的高校科研创新团队绩效综合评价研究[J]. 产业科技创新, 2020(11): 26-28.
[32]	李国欣, 李国庆, 朱堂宇, 闫世成. 基于变权和改进优劣解距离法的电能质量综合评估[J]. 智慧电力, 2021(7): 86-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDJ202107014.htm
[33]	许敬辉. 农村人居环境评价指标体系构建与实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(19): 97-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJC202319017.htm
[34]	张男星, 王纾, 孙继红. 我国高等教育综合发展水平评价及区域差异研究[J]. 教育研究, 2014, 35(05): 28-3 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ201405005.htm
[35]	姜华, 陈妍君. 卓越大学联盟的学科竞争力评价研究: 基于国家自然科学基金资助金额的分析[J]. 现代教育管理, 2021(12): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNGD202112001.htm
[36]	黄榕, 丁晓昌. 中国高等教育高质量发展水平的测度研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022(7): 100-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDXK202207008.htm
[37]	郑小强, 蒲泱竹. 成渝双城经济圈产业结构升级与环境效率: 基于非动态面板门槛模型[J]. 软科学, 2021(11): 58-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XUXI202111010.htm

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Tables(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (260) PDF downloads(34)

An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in "Double First-class" Universities

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in "Double First-class" Universities

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content