Citation: | LIU Xiao-feng, LI Yan. Higher Education Fiscal Spending and Universities Competitiveness:Spatial Features and DrivingForces Recognition[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (2): 87-100. |
Fiscal Spending on Higher Education is a key factor in promoting competitiveness of universities, which provides economical foundation and booster. Based on establishing indexes of higher education fiscal spending and competitiveness of universities and colleges, the research comprehensively leverage Coupling Degree Model, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and GeoDetector Model to discuss the spatial features and driving forces of coupling degree between higher education fiscal spending and competitiveness of universities and colleges. The result shows that coupling degrees among provinces are low and have obvious differential spatial features, with the spatial structure characteristics of disequilibrium in the whole and local clustering. The coupling degrees show that there is positive relationship between the higher education fiscal spending and competitiveness of universities which is divided mostly along the Hu's Line. On the southeast side of Hu's Line most regions are hot spots clustering area while on the northwest of Hu's Line most regions are cold spots clustering area. From the state view, government regulation plays an important role in guiding the coupling degrees, factors of coupling degree in eastern region are diversified and hierarchical and innovation boosting, faculty promoting, investment pulling, urbanization impelling, regional endowment play primary functions in the coupling degrees. Talent training structure, social serving, innovation boosting, and faculty promoting playing the primary roles in central region. In western region the coupling spatial difference mainly belongs to policy promoting type and talent training structure and investment pulling also have strong explanatory powers. In northeastern region the coupling degrees are mainly affected by government regulation, innovation boosting, talent training structure and faculty promoting.
[1] |
教育部:2019年全国教育经费执行情况统计快报[EB/OL]. http://www. moe. gov. cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202006/t20200612
_465295. html.
|
[2] |
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok, Maksym Marych, Anastasia Viknianska, Serhii Kozlovskyi and Kostiantyn Herasymiuk. Countries Disposition in the Global Scientific and Educational Area:Management and Clustering[J]. International Journal of Management, 2020, 11(5):400-415.
|
[3] |
Silvia Blum and Till van Treeck. Ordoliberalism:The Next Generation. What Do Prospective Social Science Teachers in Germany Think About the Euro Crisis?[J]. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2019, 57(4):787-804.
|
[4] |
Mostaq M. Hussain, John Russell and Ayman E. Haddad. Managing Competency in Non-Profit Organization:Experience with a European University[J]. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 2014, 8(4):209-224.
|
[5] |
Inna V. Zakharova. Competitiveness of the University as a Hybrid Structure in the Regional Educational Space[J]. Russian Journal of Regional Studies, 2020, 28(2):377-399.
|
[6] |
陈慧敏,陈海汉."双一流"下我国高校科研国际化竞争力评价与提升对策[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2021(3):104-112.
|
[7] |
廖鹏,乔冠华,金鑫,王志锋,贾金忠."双一流"高校医学学科科研竞争力分析[J].科技管理研究, 2020(10):145-150.
|
[8] |
尹敏捷,刘宏生,刘鹏祥.辽宁省地方高校知识产权竞争力分析[J].中国高校科技, 2020(1):61-64.
|
[9] |
王建华.为创新而治理:大学治理变革的方向[J].清华大学教育研究, 2020(1):12-17.
|
[10] |
张红霞,施悦琪.聚焦"科教融合":"双一流"大学本科教育评估的应有之策[J].江苏高教, 2021(6):15-24.
|
[11] |
George S. Spais. A Fundamental Formula for Leadership Efficiency-Weighting the Contribution of'Marketing Paideia'[J]. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2005, 13(1):61-77.
|
[12] |
Maja Grdinic'. Higher Education as a Means of Achieving Economic Growth and Development-A Comparative Analysis of Selected EU and Former Soviet Union Countries[J]. International Public Administration Review, 2014, 12(4):93-114.
|
[13] |
Mariana Nicolae and Roxana Marinescu. University Marketing-Innovative Communication for Effective Inter/National Survival[J]. Journal for Communication Studies, 2010, 3(5):117-138.
|
[14] |
Hanif Mauludin and Darti Djuharni. The Potential of Higher Education Competitiveness in Perspective Good Corporate Governance in Indonesia[J]. International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences, 2015, 2(6):1-9.
|
[15] |
Samantha Rullan Rosanis and Lourdes Casanova. A Review of the Mexican National Innovation System[J]. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 2016, 8(3):59-68.
|
[16] |
Merita Bernik, Mery Sondari and Deru R. Indika. Model of Quality Management System to Maintain Quality Consistency in Higher Education[J]. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 2017, 6(4):235-242.
|
[17] |
Urmas Varblane. EU Structural Funds in the Baltic Countries-Useful or Harmful?[J]. Estonian Discussions on Economic Policy, 2016, 24(2):120-136.
|
[18] |
Joshua M. Pearce. Catalyzing Mass Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells Using University Driven Green Purchasing[J]. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2016, 7(4):425-436.
|
[19] |
Jaime Rivera Camino and María D. De-Juan-Vigaray. A Model of Quality Education in Economics and Business Administration[J]. ESIC Market Economic and Business Journal, 2011, 139(5):137-164.
|
[20] |
Mark Anthony Camilleri and Adriana Camilleri. Education and Social Cohesion for Economic Growth[J]. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2016, 19(5):617-631.
|
[21] |
苏启敏.教育现代化进程中教育质量概念的历史、逻辑与结构[J].教育研究, 2020(7):39-49.
|
[22] |
吴娴,刘莉,刘念才.中国高校科技发展指数体系的构建研究[J].清华大学教育研究, 2020(1):18-25.
|