Issue 1
Jan.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
FAN Yunxia, MENG Xiaoning. Understanding the Accompanying Culture of College Entrance Examination: on the Hermes Dilemma in Ethnography Research[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (1): 83-94.
Citation: FAN Yunxia, MENG Xiaoning. Understanding the Accompanying Culture of College Entrance Examination: on the Hermes Dilemma in Ethnography Research[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (1): 83-94.

Understanding the Accompanying Culture of College Entrance Examination: on the Hermes Dilemma in Ethnography Research

  • Received Date: 2022-09-10
    Available Online: 2023-03-22
  • Publish Date: 2023-01-25
  • Ethnographic research emphasizes understanding culture through solid fieldwork and interpreting culture through text writing. In this process, ethnographic research encountered the dilemma of Cultural Interpretation: researchers, like Hermes, can only guarantee that what he said is true, but cannot guarantee to tell the whole truth. In the process of ethnographic research on accompanying study of Maozhen, as researcher, I also continue to encounter the dilemma of Hermes, the contradiction between field observation and participation, the specialization of deep research perspective, and the limitations of the established academic writing framework, which make it difficult for the ethnographic text to reflect all the facts of the field. Of course, researchers are not completely at a loss. They can ensure the authenticity of ethnographic research to a certain extent by taking reflective measures such as proper self presentation, obtaining feedback from field members, and examining the research value orientation. For the Hermes dilemma of ethnographic research, researchers do not want to eliminate it, but to warn their own ethnographic research.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    SHELLY A, SIBERT E. Using logic programming to facilitate qualitative data analysis[J]. Qualitative sociology, 1986, 9(2): 145-161. doi: 10.1007/BF01314413
    [2]
    王铭铭. 西方人类学思潮[M]. 广西: 广西师范大学出版社, 2005.
    [3]
    钱民辉. 当代欧美教育人类学研究的核心主题与趋势[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005(5): 206-213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BDZK200505031.htm
    [4]
    安·格雷. 文化研究: 民族志方法与生活文化[M]. 许梦云, 译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009: 2.
    [5]
    MITCHELL J. Ethnography[M]//The sage handbook of social science methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2007.
    [6]
    FETTERMAN D M. Ethnography. Step by step, 2nd ed[M]. London: Sage, 1998: 6.
    [7]
    陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000: 25.
    [8]
    滕星, 巴战龙. 从书斋到田野-谈教育研究的人类学范式[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2005(1): 19-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSD200501005.htm
    [9]
    李立, 等. 民族志理论探索与文本分析[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2017: 1.
    [10]
    庄孔韶. 人类学通论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020.
    [11]
    李亦园. 人类学视野[M]. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 1996: 42-43.
    [12]
    刘玉皑. 民族志导论[M]. 北京: 民族出版社, 2018.
    [13]
    马林诺夫斯基: 江村经济[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2001: 2.
    [14]
    大卫·M. 菲特曼. 民族志: 步步深入[M]. 龚建华, 译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2020.
    [15]
    克里福德·格尔茨. 文化的解释[M]. 韩莉, 译. 上海: 译林出版社, 1999: 5.
    [16]
    罗伯特·埃默森, 雷切尔·弗雷兹, 琳达·肖. 如何做田野笔记[M]. 符裕, 何珉, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2012: 2.
    [17]
    温森特·克拉潘扎诺. 赫尔墨斯的困境: 民族志描述中对颠覆因素的掩饰[M]//写文化. 高丙中, 等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2006: 83.
    [18]
    克里福德·格尔茨. 文化的解释[M]. 韩莉, 译. 上海: 译林出版社, 1999: 18.
    [19]
    劳伦斯·纽曼. 社会研究方法; 定性与定量的取向[M]. 郝大海, 等译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 385-386.
    [20]
    CHRISTIAN J, JR CHURCHILL. Ethnography as translation[J]. Qualitative sociology, 2005, 28(1): 3-24. doi: 10.1007/s11133-005-2628-9
    [21]
    伯克·约翰逊, 拉里·克里斯腾森. 教育研究-定量、定性和混合方法[M]. 马健生, 等译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2012: 364.
    [22]
    王鉴. 深描是一种什么样的方法?——兼论深描在教育研究中的应用[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 45(2): 123-130. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXDD202202015.htm
    [23]
    董轩. 重构常识: 教育民族志的方法与文本[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2021: 157-162.
    [24]
    格尔茨. 文化的解释[M]. 韩莉, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 1999.
    [25]
    许烺光, 薛刚. 宗教·种性·俱乐部[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 1990: 19.
    [26]
    POEWE K O. Writing culture and writing fieldwork: the proliferation of experimental and experiential ethnographies[J]. Ethnos, 2010, 61(3-4): 177-206.
    [27]
    滕星. 书斋与田野——教育人类学研究的方法论、方法与技术[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 7(1): 14-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZJK201901003.htm
    [28]
    拉德克利夫-布朗. 社会人类学方法[M]. 夏建中, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2002: 66.
    [29]
    乔治·H. 米德. 心灵、自我与社会[M]. 赵月瑟, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 1997: 263.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (480) PDF downloads(25) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return