Issue 6
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
BAI Hua, ZHANG Yinuo. Research on the Influence of Social Interaction on Undergraduate Academic Development Outcomes: Based on A Comparison of First-generation and Non-first-generation College Students[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2024, (6): 75-88.
Citation: BAI Hua, ZHANG Yinuo. Research on the Influence of Social Interaction on Undergraduate Academic Development Outcomes: Based on A Comparison of First-generation and Non-first-generation College Students[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2024, (6): 75-88.

Research on the Influence of Social Interaction on Undergraduate Academic Development Outcomes: Based on A Comparison of First-generation and Non-first-generation College Students

  • Received Date: 2024-03-15
    Available Online: 2025-01-18
  • Publish Date: 2024-12-25
  • Using the CCSEQ questionnaire as the survey tool, an investigation was conducted among undergraduates at ten universities in Beijing. Based on the survey data, students' self-reported learning gains and academic performance were taken as academic development outcome variables. Independent sample t-tests and multiple linear regression were used to explore the impact of social interaction on these academic development outcomes. The results indicate that non-first-generation college students exhibit higher levels of social interaction and better academic development outcomes compared to first-generation college students. The social interaction and academic development outcomes of both first-generation and non-first-generation college students follow a "U"-shaped curve across different grades. Participation in extracurricular activities does not significantly affect the learning gains for first-generation college students but has a significant impact on non-first-generation college students. The impact of social interaction on academic performance is generally small, while student-teacher interaction positively influences academic performance. It is recommended that universities provide more resources and professional guidance for students, address the needs of students at different grades, optimize extracurricular activities, and encourage student-teacher interactions to enhance educational quality and promote educational equity.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    教育部. 2022年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2023-07-05)[2023-12-7]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202307/t20230705_1067278.html.
    [2]
    张华峰, 郭菲, 史静寰. 促进家庭第一代大学生参与高影响力教育活动的研究[J]. 教育研究, 2017(6): 32-43.
    [3]
    YORK D C. Assessing the college knowledge of First-Generation and Second-Generation college students[J]. Journal of College Student Development, 1991, 32(4): 116-122. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-22802-001
    [4]
    EMEST P. College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis[M]. New York: Agathon, 1985: 11-13.
    [5]
    ASTIN A W. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education[J]. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1984, 25(4): 297-308.
    [6]
    TINTO V. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition[M]. University of Chicago press, 2012: 1-6.
    [7]
    DAVIS T M, MURRELL P H. A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1993, 34(3), 267-289. doi: 10.1007/BF00991846
    [8]
    CHICKERING A W, GAMSON Z F. Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education[J]. Biochemical Education, 1987, 1999(80): 140-141.
    [9]
    周廷勇, 周作宇. 关于大学师生交往状况的实证研究[J]. 高等教育研究, 2005(3): 79-84.
    [10]
    赵必华. 大学生学习成效影响因素的调查研究——基于35所本科院校的数据[J]. 高教探索, 2017(11): 36-44.
    [11]
    周华丽, 鲍威. 大学生校园人际互动投入的实证研究[J]. 高教探索, 2014(4): 5-9.
    [12]
    马明兰, 董霞. 生师互动、生生互动对大学生学习收获的影响研究——以兰州文理学院为例[J]. 甘肃开放大学学报, 2023, 33(04): 20-24.
    [13]
    PASCARELLA E T, PIERSON C T, WOLNIAK G C, et al. First-Generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2004, 75(3): 249-284. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256
    [14]
    PIKE G R, KUH G D. First and Second-Generation college students: A Comparison of their engagement and intellectual development[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2005, 76(3): 276-300. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772283
    [15]
    LUNDBERG C A. Peers and Faculty as Predictors of Learning for Community College Students[J]. Community College Review, 2014, 42(42): 79-98. doi: 10.1177/0091552113517931
    [16]
    周廷勇, 周作宇. 高校学生发展影响因素的探索性研究[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2012(3): 48-55+86.
    [17]
    郭娇. 基于调查数据的家庭第一代大学生在校表现研究[J]. 中国高教研究, 2020(6): 13-19. doi: 10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2020.06.04
    [18]
    方士心, 陆一. 中美家庭第一代大学生的不同大学境遇[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2022(1): 31-40. doi: 10.13397/j.cnki.fef.2022.01.004
    [19]
    龙永红, 汪雅霜. 生师互动对学习收获的影响: 第一代与非第一代大学生的差异分析[J]. 高教探索, 2018(12): 32-39.
    [20]
    陆根书, 胡文静. 师生、同伴互动与大学生能力发展——第一代与非第一代大学生的差异分析[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2015(5): 51-58.
    [21]
    GEORGE K, STANLEY I. More than you think, less than we need: Learning outcomes assessment in American higher education[R]. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, 2009: 13.
    [22]
    RICHARD J S. A Brief history of student learning assessment: How we got where we areand a proposal for where to go next[J]. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2007(1): 26-33.
    [23]
    ARLEN G. The Student Evaluation Standards: How to improve evaluations of studentsR]. California: Educational Policy Leadership Institute, 2003: 8-9.
    [24]
    P. 布尔迪约, J.C. 帕斯隆. 继承人——大学生与文化[M]. 邢克超, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2002: 24.
    [25]
    吕素香. 大二低潮现象原因与对策[J]. 中国高等教育, 2015(10): 56-58.
    [26]
    熊静, 杨颉. 美国"联邦三计划"教育支持项目的特点与实施成效[J]. 现代大学教育, 2017(2): 62-69.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(10)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (10) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return