“Claim Too Much Power”:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Home-School Conflicts in S School of G City

LIU Fuqi; XIE Ailei; XI Changhua

Mar. 2022

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Modern Education > 2022 > (1): 50-59

LIU Fuqi, XIE Ailei, XI Changhua. “Claim Too Much Power”:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Home-School Conflicts in S School of G City[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (1): 50-59.

Citation:

LIU Fuqi, XIE Ailei, XI Changhua. “Claim Too Much Power”:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Home-School Conflicts in S School of G City[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (1): 50-59.

LIU Fuqi, XIE Ailei, XI Changhua. “Claim Too Much Power”:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Home-School Conflicts in S School of G City[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (1): 50-59.

Citation:

LIU Fuqi, XIE Ailei, XI Changhua. “Claim Too Much Power”:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Home-School Conflicts in S School of G City[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (1): 50-59.

PDF( 1204 KB)

“Claim Too Much Power”:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Home-School Conflicts in S School of G City

Received Date: 2021-09-03

Abstract

Abstract

By using critical discourse analysis, this study tries to examine the causes of home-school conflicts in S school of G city. We pay particular attention to the statements of parents and teachers on their own positions and the power assumptions behind them in 15 home-school conflicts cases. The data analysis shows that the power claimed and exercised by parents and teachers are perceived by their counterparts as too much. We conceptualize this phenomenon as " Claim Too Much Power". The theoretical contribution of this study is that it emphasizes the shift from a realism perspective to a constructivism perspective in analyzing home -school conflicts. The power view of parents is based on consumerism to a certain extent, while the power view of school related subjects is based on professionalism to a certain extent.
- home-school conflict,
- critical discourse analysis,
- consumerism,
- professionalism

FullText(HTML)

References(48)

References

[1]	OECD. Let's Read Them a Story!The Parent Factor in Education[M]. Paris, France:OECD Publishing, 2012:39.
[2]	井光进,徐媛媛.构建社会广泛参与的教育治理新格局[J].教育家, 2020(12):42-43.
[3]	Saltmarsh S, McPherson A. Un/satisfactory encounters:Communication, conflict and parent-school engagement[J]. Critical Studies inEducation, 2019(4):1-16.
[4]	李勇,刘思硕.依法治校视野下"校闹"的内涵、成因及治理机制[J].青少年研究与实践, 2020, 35(03):78-83.
[5]	宋艳红.家长与教师之间冲突的社会学分析[D].首都师范大学, 2007:12.
[6]	徐国建.我国中小学家校冲突及其化解对策研究[D].曲阜师范大学, 2009:7.
[7]	章雨恬,蔡亚平.家校冲突的理性审视和解决策略[J].教育导刊, 2019(08):56-60.
[8]	梁亦华.家校冲突与冲突管理的质性研究[J].教育学报, 2015, 11(03):62-76.
[9]	崔树义.关于社会冲突的类型分析[J].社会主义研究, 1996(04):60-63.
[10]	吴虔.家长"越位"现象的思考与对策分析[J].江苏教育, 2016(63):58-59.
[11]	邓冰清.家校冲突问题及对策研究[D];华中师范大学, 2018:21.
[12]	翁明慧,王达.矛盾与和谐辩证统一视角下的和谐家校关系[J].学理论, 2016(09):211-212.
[13]	Vasquez-Salgado Y, Greenfield P M, Burgos-Cienfuegos R. Exploring home-school value conflicts:Implications for academic achievement and well-being among Latino first-generation college students[J]. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2015, 30(3):271-305.
[14]	边玉芳,刘小琪,王凌飞.当代我国中小学家校冲突的原因分析与应对建议[J].中国电化教育, 2021(05):27-32.
[15]	刘燕.小学家校合作中家长与教师教育观念冲突研究[D].西南大学, 2015:37-39.
[16]	Lasater K. Parent-Teacher Conflict Related to Student Abilities:The Impact on Students and the Family-School Partnership[J]. School Community Journal, 2016, 26(2):237-262.
[17]	钱亚玲.城市小学家校冲突及其化解对策研究[D].安庆师范大学, 2020:64.
[18]	高晓娜.小学家校冲突的成因及预防[J].教学与管理, 2019(23):4-6.
[19]	于丹丹,赵海楠.家校合作中主体与权责的边界问题思考[J].教学与管理, 2020(06):50-52.
[20]	王珏.民办学校家校冲突研究[D].南京师范大学, 2019:58-61.
[21]	Sanders M G, Epstein J L. School-family-community partnerships and educational change:International perspectives[M]. Extending educational change. Springer. 2005:202-222.
[22]	Blândul V C. The partnership between school and family-cooperation or conflict?[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012(47):1501-1505.
[23]	Mapp K L. Having their say:Parents describe why and how they are engaged in their children's learning[J]. School Community Journal, 2003, 13(1):35.
[24]	Bauch P A, Goldring E B. Teacher work context and parent involvement in urban high schools of choice[J]. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2000, 6(1):1-23.
[25]	Hoover-Dempsey K V, Bassler O C, Brissie J S. Parent involvement:Contributions of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics[J]. American Educational Research Journal, 1987, 24(3):417-435.
[26]	Bourdieu P. Sociology in question[M]. Sage, London:Sage Publications, 1993:73-76.
[27]	谢爱磊.农村学校家长参与的低迷现象研究--专业主义、不平等关系与家校区隔[J].全球教育展望, 2020, 49(03):42-56.
[28]	Xie A. Parental involvement in rural Anhui Province:Coping with the burden of guanxi[M]. Rural Education in China's Social Transition. Routledge. 2020:58-70.
[29]	Cave E. Consumerism in education[J]. Public Money&Management, 1989, 9(1):29-33.
[30]	Harvey J A. Marketing schools and consumer choice[J]. International Journal of Educational Management, 1996, 10(4):26-32.
[31]	Freeman I, Thomas M. Consumerism in education:A comparison between Canada and the United Kingdom[J]. International Journal of Educational Management, 2005, 19(2):153-177.
[32]	Stark J S. The many faces of consumerism[J]. New Directions for Higher Education, 1976,(13):89-100.
[33]	Crozier G. Parents and schools:Partnership or surveillance?[J]. Journal of Education Policy, 1998, 13(1):125-136.
[34]	Vincent C. Parents and Teachers:Power and Participation[M]. Psychology Press, 1996:30-41.
[35]	Delgado-Gaitan C. Involving parents in the schools:A process of empowerment[J]. American journal of Education, 1991, 100(1):20-46.
[36]	Smaill E. How much is too much?Partnerships and power relationships between parents and schools[J]. Journal of Initial Teacher Inquiry, 2015(1):62-64.
[37]	Crozier G. Empowering the powerful:A discussion of the interrelation of government policies and consumerism with social class factors and the impact of this upon parent interventions in their children's schooling[J]. British Journal of sociology of Education, 1997, 18(2):187-200.
[38]	Sumsion J, Goodfellow J. Parents as consumers of early childhood education and care:The feasibility of demand-led improvements to quality[M]. Sydney:Sydney University Press. 2009:167-197.
[39]	Meier C, Lemmer E. Parents as consumers:A case study of parent satisfaction with the quality of schooling[J]. Educational review, 2019, 71 (5):617-630.
[40]	Vincent C, Tomlinson S. Home-School Relationships:the swarming of disciplinary mechanisms?[J]. British Educational Research Journal, 1997, 23(3):361-377.
[41]	Bourke T, Lidstone J, Ryan M. Schooling teachers:Professionalism or disciplinary power?[J]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2015, 47 (1):84-100.
[42]	Boote D N. Teachers'professional discretion and the curricula[J]. Teachers and Teaching:Theory and practice, 2006, 12(4):461-478.
[43]	Cothran D J, Ennis C D. Students' and teachers' perceptions of conflict and power[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 1997, 13(5):541- 553.
[44]	Addi-Raccah A, Arviv-Elyashiv R. Parent empowerment and teacher professionalism:Teachers' perspective[J]. Urban Education, 2008, 43 (3):394-415.
[45]	Bæck U D K.'We are the professionals':a study of teachers'views on parental involvement in school[J]. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2010, 31(3):323-335.
[46]	Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis[J]. How to analyse talk in institutional settings:A casebook of methods, 2001:25-38.
[47]	Van Dijk T A. Discourse as structure and process[M]. Sage, London:Sage Publications, 1997:131.
[48]	Wodak R, Meyer M. Methods of critical discourse studies[M]. Sage, London:Sage Publications, 2015:3.