A Study on the Influence of Social Expectation on Doctoral Students’ Choice of Doctoral Study: From the Perspective of Identity Theory

ZHAO Wanxia; ZOU Juan

Jul. 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Modern Education > 2020 > (2): 81-88

ZHAO Wanxia, ZOU Juan. A Study on the Influence of Social Expectation on Doctoral Students’ Choice of Doctoral Study: From the Perspective of Identity Theory[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2020, (2): 81-88.

Citation:

ZHAO Wanxia, ZOU Juan. A Study on the Influence of Social Expectation on Doctoral Students’ Choice of Doctoral Study: From the Perspective of Identity Theory[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2020, (2): 81-88.

Citation:

PDF( 1286 KB)

A Study on the Influence of Social Expectation on Doctoral Students’ Choice of Doctoral Study: From the Perspective of Identity Theory

Received Date: 2019-12-06
Available Online: 2021-07-16

Abstract

Abstract

This research uses qualitative research method to explore the influence of social expectation on doctoral students’choice of doctoral study. This research selected ten doctoral students as the interviewees, and focused on four influencing factors in their choice of studying: family, marriage, gender and regional tradition. The result shows that the original family has the most basic and important influence on doctoral students’choice of studying. Students from families with advantaged cultural capital make their decision of pursuing doctoral study based on very different factors from those from families with disadvantaged cultural capitals. While marriage and gender are also important factors in their choice of studying, regional tradition does not show the same strength of influence.
- pursuing doctoral study,
- identity,
- influencing factors,
- social expectation

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	Parsons T.The Social System[M].Cambridge University Press,1951:52.
[2]	车文博.当代西方心理学新词典[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2001:168.
[3]	Carolyn A,Christopher A.Adolescents' Use of Reading Comprehension Strategies:Differences Related to Reading Proficiency, Grade Level, and Gender[J].Learning and Individual Differences,2015(37):81-95.
[4]	Neil H,Richard W. Success and Impact in Widening Participation Policy:What Works and How Do We Know?[J]. Higher Education Policy,2017,30(2):141-160.
[5]	方超,黄斌. 非认知能力、家庭教育期望与子代学业成绩[J]. 全球教育展望,2019,49(1):55-70.
[6]	吴芸. 初中教育对青少年高等教育意愿的影响研究——基于CEPS 2014调查数据的分析[J]. 教育发展研究,2018(12):72-79.
[7]	张淑华, 李海莹, 刘芳. 身份认同研究综述[J]. 心理研究, 2012,5(1):21-27.
[8]	Deaux K.Reconstructing Social Identity[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1993(19):4-12.
[9]	黄铃. 我国中小学心理教师身份认同感现状分析[J]. 中小学心理健康教育,2007(11):3-4.
[10]	Bourdieu P.The Forms of Capital[G]//J.G. Richardson(ed.),Handbook of Theory of Research of the Sociology of Education. New York:Green Word Press,1986:241-258.
[11]	Gary S.B.A Theory of Marriage[J].The Journal of Political Economy,1973,81(4):813-846.
[12]	Gary S.B.A Treatise on the Family[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1981:77.
[13]	玛萨·艾伯森·法曼. 自治的神话:依赖理论[M]. 李霞,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014.
[14]	鲍布·康纳尔. 男性气质[M]. 柳莉,张文霞,译. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:38.
[15]	佟新. 社会性别研究导论[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[16]	罗伯特·帕特南. 我们的孩子[M]. 田雷,宋鑫,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017:5.
[17]	皮埃尔·布迪厄. 男性统治[M]. 刘辉,译. 深圳:海天出版社, 2002:67-72.