Issue 1
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LEE Jong-gak. Educational Citizen and Rise of Parentological Studies:Rebranding and Academic Strategies for Parents' Substantive Participation in Education[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (1): 5-25.
Citation: LEE Jong-gak. Educational Citizen and Rise of Parentological Studies:Rebranding and Academic Strategies for Parents' Substantive Participation in Education[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2022, (1): 5-25.

Educational Citizen and Rise of Parentological Studies:Rebranding and Academic Strategies for Parents' Substantive Participation in Education

  • Received Date: 2021-10-12
  • This paper discusses the diagnosis and countermeasures for the in-depth reasons for the lack of effectiveness despite the government's policy on parental participation in education. It checks the current state of the public opinion on education and the situation in which the public opinion on education is being ignored, and confirms the existence of situations where you don't have to listen. Disregard for parents is due to the lack of parents' social presence, which is linked like a chain link due to difficulties in raising the voices of parents and insensitivity to parents' voices. This chain link is an in-depth reason that hinders the realization of parental independent and substantive participation in education. In order to cut off the chain of in-depth reasons, the first challenge is to form a social presence for parents. In order to support parents to take root in their social presence as an educational subject, resistance and struggle for recognition against the hostile culture towards parents are presented as tasks. It presents rebranding and academic strategies as a way to support solving these tasks. For rebranding, it points out the problems in the "social parent" and presents the " educational citizen" plan. Parent academic strategy is a task that theoretically supports educational subjectivity and educational participation while reflecting the three major identities of parents. The academic strategy can be largely composed of three parts:First, take a new perspective to ask questions and understand parents correctly; Second, look at education from the standpoint of parents; Third, resist a culture that is hostile toparents. Academic strategies not only involve parents, but also have a wide range of pedagogical significance. The government and educational circles should treat the problem of parents' quality with the awareness of teachers' quality. It is necessary to introduce a management strategy for education enthusiasm at the national level so that the government and the education community have the perspective and ability to nudge the educational energy of parents. The academic strategy aims for a symbiotic relationship in which the three-party relationship promotes mutual evolution through balanced research among the three actors of the state, teachers, and students-parents. The establishment of a symbiotic relationship between the three actors is a key task in establishing educational democracy and at the same time can be a new secret of sustainable educational development. The contents of teacher training education should include the knowledge of parents, and the professionalism of teachers should be transformed into a service professional culture that overcomes the exclusive professionalism of parents and actively accepts the participation of educational citizens. The policy principle of parental education participation should be changed to "activation after normalization" rather than "activation".

     

  • loading
  • [1] 김봉제(金峯濟). 텍스트마이닝을 활용한 학부모 기사 분석[J]. 학부모연구, 2017,4(2):113-146.
    [2] 오재길 외(吳在吉 外). 학부모 교육주체화 방안연구. 경기도교육연구원,2016.
    [3] Ministry of Education,KEDI. Dynamic Education for Individual and National Development: The Case of the Republic of Korea[R]. World Education Forum,2015.:21-27.
    [4] 곽삼근. 학부모의 리더십이 학교를 바꾼다[Z]. 제26차 지역사회교육포럼,2008: 7-28.
    [5] 이윤영. 성인남녀 50% “초중고 교육전반 평가 점수는 미”[N/OL].연합뉴스,2016-02-11.
    https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20160205203200004
    [6]박성진, 유근형. 13선거 공약, 승부처는 “교육”… 지자체 이슈 4년 빅데이터 분석[N/OL].동아일보,2018-04-24.https://www.donga.com/news/Politics/article/all/20180424/89759934/1.
    [7] Honneth A. Kampf um Anerkennung. 문성훈, 이현재 역. 인정투쟁-사회적 갈등의 도덕적 형식론[M]. 서울: 사월의 책,2011.
    [8]Cameron D. The Next Age of Government[EB/OL]. (2010-)[J].https://www.ted.com/speakers/david_cameron.
    [9] Collins A, Halverson R..2차 교육혁명[M].(황기우 역). 서울: 원미사,2012. (원저 2009년 출간)
    [10] 하윤수. 관계적권리에서 본 교권(敎權)의 재검토[J].교육법학연구,2018, 30(2), 185-210.
    [11] 윤선진. 학부모 이해: 소비자권력이 된 학부모[J].교육학논총,2010, 31(1):19-43.
    [12]김기수 외 (金箕洙 外). 學父母와 公敎育: 學父母 談論의 始作[M]. 파주: 교육과학사,2019:6-7.
    [13] 오재길(吳在吉). 학부모의 교육주체성 강화 방안 탐색[J]. 학부모연구, 2017,4(1): 57-74.
    [14]이종각(李鍾珏). 학부모 연구의 필요성과 의의[J]. 학부모연구,2014 1(1): 1-20.
    [15] 김주후 외(金周厚 外)(2007). 학부모센터 설립 및 운영방안 연구. 대통령자문 교육혁신위원회,2007:80.
    [16]박선형. 교육책무성[J]. 교육행정학연구,2013, 31(2):117-150.
    [17]朴昭映•신하영. 학부모의 학교 운영 참여를 둘러싼 갈등과 쟁점[J]. 교육정치학연구 ,2019(3): 401-421.
    [18] 이종각(李鍾珏). 문화와 교육[M]. 서울: 배영사,1983.
    [19] 류방란 외. 학부모의 학교 참여 실태 및 정책 방안[R].한국교육개발원, 연구보고 RR 2015-01.
    [20] 국가평생교육진흥원 외. 학부모교육백서[R].2018.
    [21] 지방교육자치법개정네트워크.일자 성명서(声明书). 2006-11-02.
    [22] 최상근 외(崔尙根 外). 학부모지원 중장기 계획 수립을 위한 기본 방향 설정 연구[R]. 한국교육개발원 수탁연구,2009, CR 2009-29.
    [23] 이종각(李鍾珏). 부모•학부모•교육열에 대한 새로운 생각, 새로운 정책[M]. 서울: 원미사,2014.
    [24] 김신일(金信一). 한국에서 학부모로 살기. 학부모의 재발견: 현상, 잠재력, 의미의 재발견[C]. 2015 한국학부모학회 연차학술대회 자료집,2015.
    [25] Ripley A. The Smartest Kids in the World. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc. 김희정 역. 무엇이 이 나라 학생들을 똑똑하게 만드는가[M]. 서울: 부키,2014.
    [26] 이종각(李鍾珏). 디카플링 해소와 국가총교육기능의 강화를 위한 미래지향적 공교육개념의 모색[J]. 한국교육,2015, 42(4): 57-85.
    [27] 이종각(李鍾珏). 한국 학부모 교육열의 정책적 시사점과 새 연구 방향의 탐색[J]. 한국교육, 2013,40(4): 121-153.
    [28] 김태종. 교육열의 경제적 가치 추정을 위한 실증연구[R]. 교육혁신위원회,2007:49.
    [29] 송병락. 세계 경제 전쟁, 한국인의 길을 찾아라[M]. 청림출판,2009:313.
    [30] 윤지로. 17C 하멜도…21C 오바마도…"높은 교육열이 한국의 힘[N/OL].세계일보,2013-11-25.http://m.segye.com/view/20131124002407.
    [31] Thomson K.(1998). Emotional Capital. Capstone Publishing Limited Oxford Centre for Innovation. 이조일, 오승훈 번역. 정서자본[M].2000.
    [32] 강대중. 학부모의 학습생애경로연구: 학부모학회의 한 과제. 한국학부모학회 창립기념세미나자료집[C].2014: 16-19.
    [33] 이종각(李鍾珏). 교육미래화를 위한 학부모정책과 공교육 개혁의 방향[J]. 교육정책연구,2017, 1(1): 61-87.
    [34]윤평중. 모든 종류의 지식은 권력의 행사와 맞물려 있다 -미셸 푸코의 교육사상[J]. 교육개발, 1999,여름호:54-59.
    [35]김승보 외(金承保 外). 학부모참여 위원회 및 학부모회의 역할정립연구[R]. 경기도의회,2019.
    [36]강소연 외. 학부모의 학교참여 현황과 과제[R]. 한국교육개발원,2011.
    [37] 교육과학기술부, 인청광역시교육청. 학부모 학교참여 길라잡이(2013년) [R] .2013:119.
    [38] Hargreaves A,Shirley D. The Fourth Way. 이찬승, 김은영 역. 학교 교육 제4의 길[M]. 서울: 21세기교육연구소,2015:188.
    [39] 김운종. 미래교육을 위한 교직관 적합성 검토[J]. 한국교원교육연구,2009, 26(4): 79-94.
    [40] 이종각(李鍾珏). 2차 교육혁명기의 교사-학부모 관계구조 변혁의 과제[J]. 학부모연구,2016, 3(2): 1-22.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (416) PDF downloads(54) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return