Issue 3
May  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Lucheng. Teacher Educational Punishment from the Perspective of Practical Logic: Problems and Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (3): 34-42.
Citation: ZHANG Lucheng. Teacher Educational Punishment from the Perspective of Practical Logic: Problems and Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (3): 34-42.

Teacher Educational Punishment from the Perspective of Practical Logic: Problems and Countermeasures

  • Received Date: 2022-09-28
    Available Online: 2023-08-08
  • Publish Date: 2023-05-25
  • Bourdieu's practical logic theory puts forward the four factors of practical logic, such as habitus, intention, time and field, which have important guiding significance for analyzing and resolving the problem of teacher education punishment. Teacher educational punishment is a practical activity with teachers as the main body. Examining teacher educational punishment from the perspective of practical logic theory, we can find some practical problems, that is, the historical and empirical nature of habitus lead to the path dependence of teacher educational punishment; the complexity of intention and situational nature lead to the anomie of teacher educational punishment; The unidirectionality and uncertainty of time lead to improper methods of teacher education and punishment; the relationship and struggle of the field lead to the failure of teacher education and punishment. In order to effectively deal with the practical problems of teacher education and punishment, it is necessary to reshape the internal structure of habitus to make education punishment get rid of path dependence; to anchor the educational attributes of intentions, so that education and discipline can return to their true nature; to face the rapid changes in time, so that education and discipline can reflect teachers' resourcefulness; to clarify the boundaries between fields, so that teachers can relatively autonomously implement punishment.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国教育部. 《中小学教育惩戒规则(试行)》[EB/OL]. (2020-09-23)[2022-08-29]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/202012/t20201228_507882.html.
    [2]
    任海涛. "教育惩戒"的概念界定[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019(4): 142-153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDXK201904013.htm
    [3]
    郑航, 冯珊珊. 教育惩戒的人格生成进路[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2022(8): 70-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYX202208019.htm
    [4]
    田友谊, 李婧玮. 基于互动仪式链的教育惩戒: 问题及治理[J]. 教育科学研究, 2022(4): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKY202204004.htm
    [5]
    管华. 教育惩戒权的法理基础重述[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020(3): 16-24. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.03.002
    [6]
    徐俊, 王真. 教育惩罚的意义系统与"有意义惩罚"的实现[J]. 教育学报, 2022(3): 25-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKJY202203003.htm
    [7]
    皮埃尔·布迪厄. 实践感[M]. 蒋梓骅, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2003.
    [8]
    银平均. 布迪厄的实践理论: 从理论综合到经验研究[J]. 思想战线, 2004(6): 66-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXZX200406013.htm
    [9]
    谢立中. 布迪厄实践理论再审视[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2): 146-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BDZK201902014.htm
    [10]
    石中英. 论教育实践的逻辑[J]. 教育研究, 2006(1): 3-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ200601001.htm
    [11]
    WACQUANT L J D. Towards a reflexive sociology: a workshop with Pierre Bourdieu[J]. Sociological theory, 1989(1): 26-63.
    [12]
    金元平. 大学场域资本的结构、位置与关系[J]. 经济学家, 2013(2): 102-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXJ201302011.htm
    [13]
    吴康宁. 教育究竟是什么——教育与社会的关系再审思[J]. 教育研究, 2016(8): 4-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ201608002.htm
    [14]
    秦鑫鑫, 范勇, 沈健. 学生家长对教师教育惩戒的支持现状与影响因素研究[J]. 中国人民大学教育学刊, 2022(1): 114-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDXK202201009.htm
    [15]
    中华人民共和国教育部. 《教育部公开曝光第九批7起违反教师职业行为十项准则典型案例》[EB/OL]. (2022-04-11)[2022-09-03]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202204/t20220411_615463.html.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国教育部. 《教育部公开曝光8起违反教师职业行为十项准则典型案例》[EB/OL]. (2022-04-11)[2022-09-03]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201912/t20191205_410994.html.
    [17]
    皮埃尔·布迪厄, 华康德. 实践与反思: 反思社会学导引[M]. 李猛, 李康, 译. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 1998.
    [18]
    余雅风, 姚真. 论作为一种制度形式的教育惩戒的度[J]. 教育科学研究, 2022(1): 5-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKY202201002.htm
    [19]
    SHILLING C. Physical capital and situated action: a new direction for corporeal sociology[J]. British journal of sociology of education, 2004(4): 473-487.
    [20]
    天津市教育委员会. 《天津市中小学教育惩戒规则实施细则(试行)》[EB/OL]. (2021-12-22)[2022-08-29]. https://jy.tj.gov.cn/ZWGK_52172/zcwj/sjwwj/202112/t20211223_5759448.html.
    [21]
    黄道主, 蔡霜. 论他者性视角下教师惩戒的教育立场[J]. 教育科学研究, 2022(8): 5-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKY202208002.htm
    [22]
    冯建军. 他者性教育: 超越教育的同一性[J]. 教育研究, 2021(9): 14-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ202109003.htm
    [23]
    格特·比斯塔. 超越人本主义教育: 与他者共存[M]. 杨超, 冯娜, 译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2020: 63.
    [24]
    旷剑敏, 袁怀宇. 自我与他者: 教师的伦理责任与价值[J]. 道德与文明, 2009(3): 93-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDYW200903022.htm
    [25]
    马克斯·范梅南. 教学机智: 教育智慧的意蕴[M]. 李树英, 译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2001.
    [26]
    马克斯·范梅南. 教育的情调[M]. 李树英, 译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2019: 144.
    [27]
    刘生全. 论教育场域[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2006(1): 78-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJPL200601007.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (403) PDF downloads(101) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return