Issue 3
May  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XIE Yongxiang. Sibling Size, Gender Structure, and Educational Attainment: A Comparative Analysis of Different Stages of School Transition (1978-2008)[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (3): 43-54.
Citation: XIE Yongxiang. Sibling Size, Gender Structure, and Educational Attainment: A Comparative Analysis of Different Stages of School Transition (1978-2008)[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (3): 43-54.

Sibling Size, Gender Structure, and Educational Attainment: A Comparative Analysis of Different Stages of School Transition (1978-2008)

  • Received Date: 2022-09-28
    Available Online: 2023-08-08
  • Publish Date: 2023-05-25
  • Most studies have statically investigated the effects of sibling size or sibling gender structure on educational attainment, while educational attainment at different stages of school transition has been inadequately examined. This paper explores the changing trend of educational inequality in different stages of school transition using data from the 2008 Chinese General Social Survey. We find that the negative effects of sibling size, the number of brothers, and the number of sisters on individual educational attainment increase, and gender inequality in educational attainment increase at the junior high school to high school stage compared to the elementary school to junior high school stage. The negative effects of sibling size and the number of sisters on individual educational attainment increase at the high school to university stage compared to the junior high school to high school stage, but the effects on gender inequality in educational attainment decrease. This indicates that the negative effects of the sibling size and gender structure on individual educational attainment increase with stages of school transition, while the educational inequality experienced by females in their early educational career is effectively mitigated.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BLAKE J. Family size and the quality of children[J]. Demography, 1981(4): 421-442.
    [2]
    HEER D M. Effects of sibling number on child outcome[J]. Annual review of sociology, 1985(1): 27-47.
    [3]
    JGER M M. Sibship size and educational attainment: a joint test of the confluence model and the resource dilution hypothesis[J]. Research in social stratification and mobility, 2009(1): 1-12.
    [4]
    王晓焘. 城市青年独生子女与非独生子女的教育获得[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011(5): 28-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXZS201105010.htm
    [5]
    LU Y, TREIMAN D J. The effect of sibship size on educational attainment in China: period variations[J]. American sociological review, 2008(5): 813-834.
    [6]
    SUDHA S. Family size, sex composition and children's education: ethic differentials over development in Peninsular Malaysia[J]. Population studies, 1997(2): 139-151.
    [7]
    AMIN V. Sibling sex composition and educational outcomes: a review of theory and evidence for the UK[J]. Labour, 2009(1): 67-96.
    [8]
    HAUSER R M, KUO H D. Does the gender composition of sibships affect women's educational attainment[J]. Journey of human resource, 1998(3): 644-657.
    [9]
    KAESTNER R. Are brothers really better? sibling sex composition and educational achievement revisited[J]. Journal of human resources, 1997(2): 250-284.
    [10]
    BAUER T, GANG I. Sibling rivalry in educational attainment: the German case[J]. Labour, 2001(2): 237-255.
    [11]
    BUTCHER K F, CASE A. The effect of sibling sex composition on women's education and earnings[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 1994(3): 531-563.
    [12]
    CONLEY D. Sibship sex composition: effects on educational attainment[J]. Social science research, 2000(3): 441-457.
    [13]
    CHU C Y C, XIE Y, YU R. Effect of sibship structure revisited: evidence from intrafamily resource transfer in Taiwan[J]. Sociology of education, 2007(2): 91-113.
    [14]
    CHU C Y C, TSAY R S, YU R. Intergenerational transmission of sex-specific differential treatments: the allocation of education resources among siblings[J]. Social science research, 2008(2): 386-399.
    [15]
    叶华, 吴晓刚. 生育率下降与中国男女教育的平等化趋势[J]. 社会学研究, 2011 (5): 153-177+245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201105007.htm
    [16]
    郑磊. 同胞性别结构、家庭内部资源分配与教育获得[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(5): 76-103+243-244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201305004.htm
    [17]
    张克中, 陶东杰, 江求川. 中国农村子女教育同胞竞争效应研究[J]. 教育与经济, 2013(6): 44-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYJI201306007.htm
    [18]
    黎煦, 刘华. 同胞数量与教育获得的性别差异[J]. 人口与经济, 2016(3): 19-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4149.2016.03.003
    [19]
    王兵. 同胞结构、关键资源分配与教育分流——对初中毕业生的考察(1978-2008)[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2016(1): 51-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANG201601008.htm
    [20]
    郑筱婷, 陆小慧. 有兄弟对女性是好消息吗?——家庭人力资本投资中的性别歧视研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017(1): 277-298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU201801011.htm
    [21]
    陈立娟, 范黎波. 多子女家庭教育获得中的"长女效应"及其演进[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2020(3): 86-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZJK202003011.htm
    [22]
    张月云, 谢宇. 低生育率背景下儿童的同胞数量、教育资源获得与学业成绩[J]. 人口研究, 2015(4): 19-34.
    [23]
    DOWNEY D B. When bigger is not better: family size, parental resources, and children's educational performance[J]. American sociological review, 1995(5): 746-761.
    [24]
    BREEN R, GOLDTHORPE J H. Explaining educational differentials: towards a formal rational action theory[J]. Rationality and society, 1997(3): 275-305.
    [25]
    吴愈晓. 中国城乡居民教育获得的性别差异研究[J]. 社会, 2012(4): 112-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHEH201204008.htm
    [26]
    BECKER G S, TOMES N. An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility[J]. Journal of political economy, 1979(6): 1153-1189.
    [27]
    唐俊超. 输在起跑线——再议中国社会的教育不平等(1978-2008)[J]. 社会学研究, 2015(3): 123-145+244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201503006.htm
    [28]
    李煜. 制度变迁与教育不平等的产生机制——中国城市子女的教育获得(1966-2003)[J]. 中国社会科学, 2006(4): 97-109+207. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK200604008.htm
    [29]
    刘精明. 中国基础教育领域中的机会不平等及其变化[J]. 中国社会科学, 2008(5): 101-116+206-207. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK200805010.htm
    [30]
    BYUN S, SCHOFER E, KIM K. Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: the case of South Korea[J]. Sociology of education 2012(3): 219-239.
    [31]
    HANNUM E. Political change and the urban-rural gap in basic education in China, 1949-1990[J]. Comparative education review, 1999(2): 193-211.
    [32]
    WU X. The Household registration system and rural-urban educational inequality in contemporary China[J]. Chinese sociological review, 2011(2): 31-51.
    [33]
    HAO L, HU A, LO J. Two aspects of the rural-urban divide and educational stratification in China: a trajectory analysis[J]. Comparative education review, 2014(3): 509-536.
    [34]
    吴愈晓. 教育分流体制与中国的教育分层(1978-2008)[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(4): 179-202+245-246. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201304008.htm
    [35]
    HANNUM E. Education stratification by ethnicity in China: enrollment and attainment in the early reform years[J]. Demography, 2002(1): 95-117.
    [36]
    洪岩璧. 族群与教育不平等——我国西部少数民族教育获得的一项实证研究[J]. 社会, 2010(2) : 45-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHEH201002004.htm
    [37]
    ALWIN D F, THORNTON A. Family origin and the schooling process: early versus late influence of parental characteristics[J]. American sociological review, 1984(6): 784-802.
    [38]
    陈纯槿, 郅庭瑾. 教育财政投入能否有效降低教育结果不平等——基于中国教育追踪调查数据的分析[J]. 教育研究, 2017(7): 68-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ201707009.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (290) PDF downloads(141) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return