Issue 1
Jan.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CAO Chunping, ZHU He. On Research Methods of the History of Educational Concepts[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (1): 106-112.
Citation: CAO Chunping, ZHU He. On Research Methods of the History of Educational Concepts[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2023, (1): 106-112.

On Research Methods of the History of Educational Concepts

  • Received Date: 2022-10-14
    Available Online: 2023-03-22
  • Publish Date: 2023-01-25
  • The study of the history of educational concepts is generally based on a mind-body dualism that views educational concepts as mirrors of nature with historical coherence. The cultural turn in the research methodology of the history of educational concepts challenges the presupposition of the relationship between traditional conceptions and nature, and suggests two possible directions for the methodological turn of the history of educational conceptions. The first is to draw on linguistic analysis to return to the original contexts of educational ideas, to uncover the problems within the contexts, and to focus on and study educational metaphors. The second is to draw on discourse analysis to consider educational ideas as the product of the discursive actions of specific discursive communities within a discursive power structure. In addition, the new materialist research methodology complements the cultural turn by providing an ontological perspective of cultural-biological monism. In this light, the study of the history of educational ideas can revisit the relationship between body, matter and spirit in education.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    张斌贤, 王晨. "大学'理念'考辨——兼论大学'理想'与大学'观念'"[J]. 江苏高教, 2005: 6-9.
    [2]
    理查德·罗蒂. 哲学与自然之镜[M]. 李幼蒸, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1979: 55.
    [3]
    钱宁峰. "观念史抑或概念史——评《观念史研究: 中国现代重要政治术语的形成》"[J]. 学术界, 2011, 155: 97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJI201104012.htm
    [4]
    KANT I. Critique of Pure Reason[M]. Penguin Books, 2007: 177-178.
    [5]
    康德. 三大批判合集(上)[M]. 邓晓芒, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 122-123.
    [6]
    VOSNIADOU S, Context and the development of metaphor comprehension[J]. Technical report, 1988, 444: 2.
    [7]
    昆廷·斯金纳. 国家与自由: 斯金纳访华讲演录[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018: 159-161.
    [8]
    拉里·西登托普. 发明个体——人在古典时代与中世纪的地位[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2021: 10, 13, 16.
    [9]
    TAYLOR C. Sources of the self[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989: 151, 153.
    [10]
    TURBAYNE C M, The myth of metaphor[M]. Now Haven and London: Tale University Press, 1962.
    [11]
    BUCK G. The metaphor: a study in the psychology of rhetoric[M]. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Inland Press, 1899: 3, 16-17.
    [12]
    GORDON P E, What is Intellectual History? A frankly partisan introduction to a frequently misunderstood field[EB/OL]. [2022-05-01]. https://max.book118.com/html/2017/1006/136284939.shtm.
    [13]
    张乐. 从"洪堡的教育观念"到"洪堡神话"——一个特定研究母题的系谱学分析[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2017(3): 10-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJPL201703004.htm
    [14]
    GILBERT R, LOW P. Discourse and power in education: analysis institutional processes in schools[J]. Australian educational researcher, 1994(3): 1-24.
    [15]
    COOLE D, FROST S. New materialisms: ontology, agency, and politics[M]. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2010: 8-9.
    [16]
    PITTS-TAYLOR V. Mattering: feminism, science, and materialism[M]. New York: New York University Press, 2016: 1-16.
    [17]
    陈康. 论希腊哲学[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1995: ii-iii.
    [18]
    张斌贤. 教育思想史与教育制度史的关系: 脱节与重构[J]. 教育史研究, 2021(4): 41-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYUY202104004.htm
    [19]
    特里·平卡德. 德国哲学1760—1860[M]. 侯震武, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 3.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (533) PDF downloads(22) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return