Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Xiaowei, YUAN Xuhui. The Role Interpretation and Evaluation Criteria of Teachers' Modernity Character[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2025, (4): 30-38.
Citation: YANG Xiaowei, YUAN Xuhui. The Role Interpretation and Evaluation Criteria of Teachers' Modernity Character[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2025, (4): 30-38.

The Role Interpretation and Evaluation Criteria of Teachers' Modernity Character

  • Received Date: 2025-03-15
    Available Online: 2025-09-04
  • Publish Date: 2025-08-25
  • As learning paradigms evolve and schools undergo modernization, the role of teachers will inevitably be redefined. This study examines how teachers enact three core modernity attributes across professional dimensions: 1) As agents of professional development: cultivating individual competencies through autonomous practice; 2) As instructional practitioners: driving pedagogical innovation through creative engagement; 3) As institutional change catalysts: expanding organizational value influence through strategic openness. The cultivation of teachers' modern qualities requires clear value orientations to guide evaluation directions. Following a developmental orientation, schools strengthen diagnostic evaluations to foster teachers' autonomy. Adhering to a scientific orientation, schools optimize formative evaluations to stimulate teachers' innovation. Moving toward a collaborative orientation, schools improve summative evaluations to enhance teachers' openness. Focusing on key indicators in teacher evaluation can prevent evaluation from losing focus and enhance evaluation effectiveness. By setting evaluation key indicators based on teachers' roles in educational activities, evaluation can promote the cultivation of teachers' modern qualities and drive schools and teachers toward high-quality development together.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    鲍利辛可夫. 时代挑战与教育科学的迫切任务[J]. 教育研究, 2004(9): 45-49.
    [2]
    中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第46卷上册[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1971: 494.
    [3]
    英格尔斯. 人的现代化——心理·思想·态度·行为[M]. 殷陆君, 编译. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 1985: 22-33.
    [4]
    范国睿. 教育强国与人的现代化发展[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023(2): 5-26.
    [5]
    潘涌. 论全球化视野中的教师角色现代化[J]. 教育与现代化, 2003(2): 77-80.
    [6]
    陈江华. 学习型组织理论研究综述与评价[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(2): 65-71.
    [7]
    BIESTA G, TEDDER M. Agency and learning in the life course: towards an ecological perspective[J]. Studies in the education of adults, 2007 (2): 132-149.
    [8]
    帕尔默. 教学勇气: 漫步教师的心灵[M]. 吴国珍, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2005: 10.
    [9]
    田国秀, 李冬卉. 提升新教师抗逆力: 内容与策略——国外研究经验与借鉴[J]. 教师教育研究, 2018(3): 95-102.
    [10]
    杨婷. 现代化学校建设中创新型教师的发展与评价[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2022(7): 79-83.
    [11]
    崔允漷, 郭华, 吕立杰, 等. 义务教育课程改革的目标、标准与实践向度(笔谈)——《义务教育课程方案和课程标准(2022年版)》解读[J]. 现代教育管理, 2022, (9): 6-19.
    [12]
    多尔. 后现代课程观[M]. 王红宇, 译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000: 232.
    [13]
    张沿沿, 赵丽, 张舒予. 美国"全球胜任力"教师教育课程体系及其启示[J]. 比较教育研究, 2017(10): 90-96.
    [14]
    何学锋. 以"成事成人"激活教师的内生动力[J]. 上海教育, 2021(27): 30-31.
    [15]
    孙河川. 教师评价指标体系的国际比较研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2011.
    [16]
    HARGREAVES A. The coming of post-standardization: three weddings and a funeral[M]//Ciaran Sugrue. The future of educational change: international perspectives. London: Routledge, 2008: 15-32.
    [17]
    比斯塔. 测量时代的好教育: 伦理、政治和民主的维度[M]. 张立平, 韩亚菲, 译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2019: 26.
    [18]
    张华中, 刘玉勇, 童玉峰. 量化评价: 打造教师评价的区域新样态[J]. 江苏教育, 2024(2): 15-19.
    [19]
    王斌华. 教师评价标准的研究[J]. 教师教育研究, 2009(6): 53-57.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (23) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return