重审教学哲学：分析传统、本真与解放的美丽邂逅

简成熙

重审教学哲学：分析传统、本真与解放的美丽邂逅

简成熙

屏东大学教育行政研究所, 屏东 90003

详细信息

中图分类号: G420
计量
- 文章访问数: 292
- HTML全文浏览量: 47
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-12
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-22

Rethinking Teaching Philosophy: A Beautiful Encounter between Analytic Tradition,Authenticity with Emancipation

CHIEN Cheng-Hsi

摘要

摘要: 随着科学、技术的一日千里,哲学对于教育的影响日益降低,许多基层教师汲汲于学习教学新技巧。其实,哲学对于教学反思的功能,一直未曾间断。1960年代分析的教育哲学对于教学概念、模式都有许多贡献,哲学家帕斯莫尔特别撰写教学哲学。同一时间,现象学、存在主义发展本真的教育理念,与分析传统分庭抗礼。近年来,后结构主义学者比斯塔站在本真的立场,希望重拾教学理念,恢复教师与学生的主体性。他更发扬洪西耶赫的空知教师的概念,让解放的教学能够立基于师生平等的设定。在后现代、后结构、后疫情,乃至后人类时代的来临时刻,仍然需要教学哲学的深刻反思。
- 教学 /
- 教学哲学 /
- 本真性 /
- 解放教育 /
- 后结构主义
Abstract: With the rapid development of science and technology,the influence of philosophy on education is decreasing day by day.Many elementary teachers are eager to learn new teaching skills.In fact,philosophy has continued to exert its influence on the function of teaching reflection.Philosopher J.Passmore wrote the monograph named the philosophy of teaching.The analytic philosophy of education in the 1960s has made many contributions to the concept and mode of teaching.At the same time,phenomenology and existentialism developed the educational idea of authenticity and competed with the analytical tradition.Poststructuralist scholar G.J.J.Biesta hopes to re-discover teaching and restores the subject of teachers and students from the standpoint of authenticity.He also carried forward J.Rancière's concept of the ignorant schoolmasters,so that the emancipatory teaching can be based on the axioms of equality between teachers and students.The advent of the post-modern,post-epidemic and even post-human times,profound reflection of teaching philosophy is always needed.
- Teaching /
- Philosophy of teaching /
- Authenticity /
- Emancipatory education /
- Post-structuralism

HTML全文

参考文献(48)

[1]	MARTIN J R. Educational reconfigured:culture, encounter, and change[M]. New York and London:Routledge, 2011.
[2]	简成熙.理性、分析、教育人[M].台北:师大书苑, 1996.
[3]	PASSMORE J. The philosophy of teaching[M]. Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press, 1980.
[4]	FEIGL H. Aims of education for our age of science:reflections of a logical empiricist[M]//Modern philosophy of education:54th yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1955:304-341.
[5]	简成熙.重审教育理论性质:纪念保罗·赫斯特教授[J].当代教育科学, 2021(3):3-20.
[6]	KNELLER G F. Movements of thought in modern education[M]. New York:Macmillan Publishing Company, 1984.
[7]	FENSTERMACHER G D. Philosophy of research on teaching:three aspects[M]//Handbook of research on teaching. New York:Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986:37-49.
[8]	GREEN T F. A topology of the concept of teaching[M]//Concepts of teaching:philosophical essays. Chicago:Rand McNally&Company, 1968:28-62.
[9]	SNOOK I A. Concepts of indoctrination:philosophical essays[M]. London:RKP, 1972.
[10]	SOLTIS J F.教育概念分析导论[M].简成熙,译.台北:五南图书出版公司, 1995.
[11]	MARTIN J R. Explaining, understanding, and teaching[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1970.
[12]	SCHEFFLER I. Reason and teaching[M]. New York:The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1973.
[13]	简成熙.重构自主性作为教育目的:中西耻感取向的积极意义[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2020, 19(2):64-77.
[14]	简成熙.证成批判思维——兼回应批判思维只适用自由社会吗[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(1):78-93.
[15]	简成熙.批判式思维是不是普遍性思维能力?——环绕McPeck的相关论辩[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 44(1):85-97.
[16]	KERR D H, SOLTIS J F. Locating teacher competency:an action description of teaching[J]. Educational theory, 1974, 24(1):3-16.
[17]	NODDINGS N. Teacher competence:an extension of Kerr-Soltis model[J]. Educational theory, 1974, 24(1):284-290.
[18]	MACMILLAN C J B, GARRISON J W. A logic theory of teaching:erotetics and intentionality[M]. Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.
[19]	KOMISAR B P. Teaching:act and enterprise[M]//Concepts of teaching:philosophical essays. Chicago:Rand McNally&Company, 1968:63-88.
[20]	MARTIN J R. Changing the educational landscape:philosophy, women, and curriculum[M]. New York:Routledge, 1994.
[21]	HARPER R. The significance of existence and recognition for education[M]//Modern philosophies and education:54th yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1955:215-253.
[22]	VANDENBERG D V. Existential and phenomenological influences in educational philosophy[M]//Philosophy of education since mid-century. New York:Teachers College, Columbia University, 1981:38-63.
[23]	KNELLER G F. Existentialism and education[M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons, Inc, 1958.
[24]	GREENE M. Philosophy and teaching[M]//Handbook of research on teaching. New York:Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986:479-501.
[25]	THOMPSON M B. Authenticity in education:from narcissism and freedom to the messy interplay of self-exploration and acceptable tension[J].Studies in philosophy and education, 2015, 34(6):1-16.
[26]	MORRIS V C. Existentialism in education:what it means[M]. New York:Harper&Row, 1966.
[27]	COOPER D. Authenticity and learning[M]. London, UK:Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1983.
[28]	BONNETT M, CUYPERS S. Autonomy and authenticity in education[M]//The blackwell guide to the philosophy of education. Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2003:326-340.
[29]	BONNETT M. Authenticity and education[J]. Journal of philosophy of education, 1978, 12(1):51-66.
[30]	BONNETT M. Education in a destitute time[J]. Journal of philosophy of education, 1983, 17(1):21-33.
[31]	BONNETT M. Education as a form of the poetic:a Heideggerian approach to learning and the teacher-pupil relationship[M]//Heidegger, education and modernity. Lanham, MD:Rowman&Littlefield, 2002:229-244.
[32]	简成熙.信息时代知识论的反思与正解:海德格尔、启蒙的辩证与赛博格[J].教育学报, 2021, 17(2):3-17.
[33]	VANDENBERG D V. Education and the American dream[C]//Philosophy of Education 1975. Edwardsville, Ill:Philosophy of Education Society, 1975:298-312.
[34]	简成熙.教育评价时代的危机与Biesta的教育美丽冒险[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2019, 18(1):61-75.
[35]	BIESTA G J J, STENGEL B S. Thinking philosophically about teaching[M]//AERA handbook of research on teaching. Washington, DC:AERA, 2016.
[36]	BIESTA G J J. The rediscovery of teaching[M]. London and New York:Routledge, 2017.
[37]	BIESTA G J J. Resisting the seduction of the global education measurement industry:notes on the social psychology of PISA[J]. Ethics and Education, 2015, 10(3):348-360.
[38]	BIESTA G J J. The beautiful risk of education[M]. London and New York:Routledge, 2016.
[39]	简成熙.论G. J. J. Biesta对学习化的批评与教学的欺许:兼论对师资培育的启示[J].教育研究集刊, 2022, 68(2):81-116.
[40]	BIESTA G J J. On the giving of teaching:encountering the educational phenomenon[M]//Phenomenology and educational theory in conversation. London:RKP, 2021:11-25.
[41]	BIESTA G J J. No education without hesitation:exploring the limits of educational relations[C]//2012 Philosophy of Education. Urban, IL:Philosophy of Education Society. 2012:1-13.
[42]	FREIRE P. Pedagogy of the oppressed[M]. New York:Continuum, 1993.
[43]	简成熙.两种批判取向的通识教育进路:批判思考与批判教育学[J].通识学刊:理念与实务, 2020, 8(2):1-34.
[44]	RANCIÈRE J. On ignorant schoolmasters[M]//Jacques Rancière:education, truth, emancipation. London and New York:Continuum, 2010:1-24.
[45]	CHAMBERS S A. Jacques Rancière's lesson on the lesson[J]. Educational philosophy and theory, 2013, 45(6):637-646.
[46]	ENGELS-SCHWARZPAUL A C. The ignorant supervisor:about common worlds, epistemological modesty and distributed knowledge[J]. Educational philosophy and theory, 2015, 47(12):1250-1264.
[47]	RANCIÈRE J. The emancipated spectator[M]. London:Verso, 2009.
[48]	NODDINGS N. Critical lesson:what our school should teach?[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2006.