发达国家营利性高校运行的市场层次、运作逻辑与影响因素

彭虹斌

发达国家营利性高校运行的市场层次、运作逻辑与影响因素

彭虹斌

基金项目:

本文系2019年度广东省普通高校特色创新类项目"普职分流的生涯蒌缩困境及职业策略研究"（项目编号：2019WTSCX013）的阶段性成果。

详细信息

作者简介:
彭虹斌,男,华南师范大学政治与公共管理学院教管系教授,教育学博士,博士生导师(广东广州,510006)

中图分类号: G646
计量
- 文章访问数: 281
- HTML全文浏览量: 55
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-31
- 网络出版日期: 2021-07-16

The Market Orientation, Operational Logic and Affecting Factors of For-profit Private Universities in Developed Countries

PENG Hongbin

摘要

摘要: 根据发达国家的营利性私立高校的市场规模来看，营利性私立高等学校绝大多数定位于两年制的职业技术学院，英美两国的少数营利性私立高校涉足硕士和博士教育。营利性高等教育市场的发展正是基于市场化的公共管理理念，提供多样化的供学习者选择的课程和职业培训，适应市场发展，大量聘任兼职教师，不重视科研投入。影响营利性高等教育发展的主要因素有市场化程度、政府的政策支持以及该国的高等教育学龄人口是否充足。
- 营利性 /
- 市场化 /
- 职业培训
Abstract: In terms of the market size of for-profit private universities in developed countries, the majority of for-profit private higher education institutions are in the form of two-year vocational and technical colleges. In the meantime, a small number of for-profit private universities offer masters and PhD programmes in the UK and the US. The development of for-profit higher education market is based on the concept of market-oriented public management, which provides diversified courses and vocational training for learners, adapts to the market development, employs a large number of part-time teachers, and pays less attention to scientific research. The main factors affecting the development of for-profit higher education are the degree of marketization, government's public policy and the sufficiency of the school-age population for higher education in the country.
- profit-making /
- marketization /
- vocational training

HTML全文

参考文献(31)

[1]	Beaver, William. The Rise and Fall of For-Profit Higher Education[J]. Academe, 2017, 103(1):32-37.
[2]	Marcus, Jon. Can For-Profit Colleges Rebound?[J] Education Next, 2019, 19(1):45-50.
[3]	The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Standard Listings[EB/OL]. (2017-10-30)[2020-06-06]. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/lookup/standard.php
[4]	Martin E, MacLaine C. The Role and Value of Private Career Colleges in Canada[M]. Ottawa, ON:Conference Board of Canada, 2016:15-17.
[5]	Roger Pizarro Milian. Legitimacy at the "Margins":Promotional Strategies in the Canadian For-Profit College Sector[J]. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 2018, 48(1):60-81.
[6]	喻恺. 模糊的英国大学性质:公立还是私立[J]. 教育发展研究, 2008(13-14):89-93.
[7]	王晓辉. 法国私立教育的基本特点[J]. 比较教育研究, 2002(9):41-46.
[8]	中华人民共和国教育部. 法国[EB/OL]. (2018-12-22)[2020-06-06]. http://www.jsj.edu.cn/n1/12033.shtml.
[9]	中华人民共和国教育部. 澳大利亚学校名单:私立学校[EB/OL]. (2018-12-22)[2020-06-06]. http://www.jsj.edu.cn/news/1/933.shtml.
[10]	严平. 日本私立大学分类管理办学的政策演进及其法律依据[J]. 中国人民大学教育学刊, 2018(1):16-28.
[11]	陈武元, 薄云. 韩国、马来西亚、菲律宾三国私立高等教育经费政策研究[J]. 高等教育研究, 2008(2):100-106.
[12]	Andalo D. First Profit-making Company to Award Degrees[N]. The Guardian, 2007-09-25(2).
[13]	Waden University的官方网站[EB/OL]. (2018-12-12)[2020-06-08]. https://www.waldenu.edu/programs.
[14]	The Failure of For-Profit Education:Implications for TAFE[J]. The Australian Tafe Teacher, 2017(1):8-10.
[15]	William G. Tierney, Gilbert C. Henschke New Players, Different Game:Understanding the Rise of For-Profit Colleges and Universities[M]. Washington:The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007:27-48.
[16]	Bailey T, Badway N, Gumport P J. For-Profit Higher Education and Community Colleges[M]. Stanford, CA:National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, 2001:9.
[17]	Tatyana Guzman, Maureen A. Pirog, Haeil Jung. Cost of Higher Education:For-Profit Universities and Online Learning[J]. The Social Science Journal, 2019(1):1-11.
[18]	Deming, David J, Claudia Goldin, et al. The For-Profit Postsecondary School Sector:Nimble Critters or Agile Predators?[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2012, 26(1):139-164.
[19]	R. A. Malatest, Associates. Survey of Canadian Career College Students:Phase II. Edmonton, AB[R/OL]. (2018-08-03)[2020-06-08]. http://www.cirst.uqam.ca/Portals/0/docs/FondationBM/080331_SCPEP_EN.pdf.
[20]	Pizarro Milian R. What's For Sale At Canadian Universities? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Promotional Strategies[J]. Higher Education Quarterly, 2017, 71(1):53-74.
[21]	United States Senate HELP Committee. Majority Committee Staff Report and Accompanying Minority Committee Staff Views. For-Profit Higher Education:The Failure to Safeguard the Federal Investment and Ensure Student Success[R]. United States Senate HELP Committee, 2012:120.
[22]	Hentschke, Guilbert C, Vicente M. Lechuga, et al. For-Profit Colleges and Universities:Their Markets, Regulation, Performance, and Place in Higher Education[M]. Sterling, VA:Stylus Publishing, 2010:150-152.
[23]	Cellini, Stephanie Riegg. Crowded Colleges and College Crowd-out:The Impact of Public Subsidies on the Two-year College Market[J]. American EconomicJournal:Economic Policy, 2009, 1(2):1-30.
[24]	Phillip W. Magness. For-Profit Universities and the Roots of Adjunctification in US Higher Education[J]. Liberal Education, 2016(1):50-60.
[25]	U. S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Emerging Risk?:An Overview of Growth, Spending, Student Debt and Unanswered Questions in For-Profit Higher Education[EB/OL]. (2011-09-06)[2020-06-08]. http://harkin.senate.gov/documents/pdf/4c23515814dca.pdf.
[26]	Deming, David J, Noam Yuchtman, et al. The Value of Postsecondary Credentials in the Labor Market:An Experimental Study[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(3):778-806.
[27]	Education Commission of the States. Survey Analysis:State Statutes and Regulations Governing the Operation of Degree-Granting For-Profitinstitutions of Higher Education[EB/OL]. (2011-09-06)[2020-06-08]. http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/14/48/1448.htm.
[28]	吴华, 王习. 营利性民办学校应该享受税收优惠[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2017(3):14-18.
[29]	The United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Indices and Indicators[R]. New York:Human Development Report Office, 2018:1-123.
[30]	联合国人口司. 世界人口展望[R/OL]. (2020-01-01)[2020-02-20]. https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=FR-CA.
[31]	世界银行官方网站[EB/OL]. (2020-01-01)[2020-03-03]. https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/SM.POP.NETM?locations=JP-KR.