Navigating through Hypothetical and Existential Worlds: Revisiting the Issue of "Assumptions" and "Survival" in Pedagogy
-
摘要: 在教育学领域，存在着“假设的世界”和“生存的世界”两种世界，本质上体现了教育的理想与现实的二重性。二者虽然并非完全割裂，却也并不完全重叠。论证人“在假设的世界中生存”，强调“假设”对于“生存”的先在性、先导性意义，并不必然能够驳斥人“在生存的世界中假设”所强调的“生存”对于“假设”的本体性、支撑性地位，反之亦然。从人的日常判断、实践行动及研究活动三个维度来看，“假设”与“生存”各有其高度也各有其限度，正如“假设”不足以决定“生存”一样，“生存”同样不足以决定“假设”。我们能够确信的只是当我们“假设”时处于“假设的世界”，当我们“生存”时处于“生存的世界”。人作为教育的主体，能够而且必然在这两个世界之中穿梭。Abstract: In the field of pedagogy, there are two types of worlds, the "hypothetical world" and the "existential world", which essentially reflect the duality between the ideal and the realistic nature of education. While the two are not completely separate, they do not completely overlap either. Arguing that man survives in a "hypothetical world" and emphasizing the precedence of "hypothesis" to "survival" does not necessarily refute the ontological and supportive role of "survival" to "hypothesis" as emphasized by the hypothesis of man in a "world of survival", and vice versa. From the three dimensions of daily judgment, practical action and research activities, "hypothesis" and "survival" each have their own heights and limits. Just as "hypothesis" is not enough to determine "survival", and "survival" is also not enough to determine "hypothesis". All we can be sure of is that we are in a "hypothetical world" when we "assume" and in a "world of existence" when we "survive". The human being, as the subject of education, can and must move between these two worlds.
-
Key words:
- Duality /
- Subjectivity /
- Hypothetical world /
- Existential world
-
[1] 吴康宁. 在假设的世界中生存——关于人的一个假设[J]. 高等教育研究, 2005(9): 32-39. [2] 程天君. 在生存的世界中假设——《在假设的世界中生存》读后[J]. 高等教育研究, 2012(11): 6-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HIGH201211003.htm [3] 郭于华. 问题引导下的田野调查与研究[J]. 民间文化论坛, 2007(1): 28-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WHLT200701009.htm [4] [美]约瑟夫·弗莱彻. 境遇伦理学——新道德论[M]. 程立显, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1989: 1-5. [5] [法]皮埃尔·布迪厄, [美]华康德. 实践与反思: 反思社会学导引[M]. 李猛, 李康, 译. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 1998: 131-156. [6] 俞吾金. 如何理解马克思的实践概念——兼答杨学功先生[J]. 哲学研究, 2002(11): 16-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXYJ200211003.htm [7] [美]汉娜·阿伦特. 人的境况[M]. 王寅丽, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2017: 48-59. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 174
- HTML全文浏览量: 134
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0
下载: