留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

具身智能参与下的教师角色重构

孙福海

孙福海. 具身智能参与下的教师角色重构[J]. 现代教育论丛, 2025, (2): 36-46.
引用本文: 孙福海. 具身智能参与下的教师角色重构[J]. 现代教育论丛, 2025, (2): 36-46.
SUN Fuhai. On the Teacher Role Reconstruction in the Context of Embodied AI Participation[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2025, (2): 36-46.
Citation: SUN Fuhai. On the Teacher Role Reconstruction in the Context of Embodied AI Participation[J]. Journal of Modern Education, 2025, (2): 36-46.

具身智能参与下的教师角色重构

基金项目: 

2023年度广东省哲学社会科学规划学科共建项目“珠三角地区中小学教师数字化教学能力评价研究” GD23XJY52

详细信息
    作者简介:

    孙福海,男,河南项城人,华南师范大学教育科学学院实验师,博士,主要研究方向为教师教育、教育人工智能和学科教学,电子邮箱:sunfuhai@m.scnu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: G40-057

On the Teacher Role Reconstruction in the Context of Embodied AI Participation

  • 摘要: 作为人工智能在教育中的实践应用,AI教师在本质上遵循着离身智能的认知进路,但离身智能很难产生真正的认知交互和知识生成。针对离身智能的局限性,罗德尼·布鲁克斯(Rodney Brooks)提出人工智能应该具备具身性,将物理形态与环境感知融入机器人设计中,这为突破传统人工智能框架提供了新路径。在四种典型的AI课堂模型中,人类教师角色呈现出差异化定位:作为主导者,人类教师统筹课堂教学,AI系统提供精准的教学支持和个性化服务;作为合作者,人类教师与AI共同设计和实施教学活动,形成优势互补的协作关系;作为协助者,人类教师监督和指导AI主导的教学过程,开展适时干预和教学质量保障;而作为竞争者,人类教师与AI教师可以各自独立完成教学任务。这表明AI已经超越了原有的工具属性,成为具有自主性的课堂参与主体,催生出基于人机互补的混合智能教学新模式。

     

  • 图  1  人类教师作为课堂的主导者

    图  2  人类教师作为课堂的合作者

    图  3  人类教师作为课堂的协助者

    图  4  人类教师作为课堂的竞争者

  • [1] Elliott, A. The culture of AI: Everyday life and the digital revolution[M]. New York: Routledge. 2019: 15-16.
    [2] Bryson, J. J. & Theodorou, A. How society can maintain human-centric artificial intelligence[J]. Human-centered digitalization and services, 2019: 305-323.
    [3] Kim, Y., Soyata, T. & Behnagh, R. F. Towards emotionally aware AI smart classroom: Current issues and directions for engineering and education[C]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 5308-5331.
    [4] Underwood, J. Exploring AI language assistants with primary EFL students[C]. CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions–short papers from EUROCALL, 2017: 317-321.
    [5] Han, J. Emerging technologies: robot assisted language learning[J]. Language learning and technology. 2012, 16(3): 1-9.
    [6] Shilling, C. The body and social theory (3rd edition)[M]. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2012: 96-97.
    [7] Birke, L. Bodies and biology[C]. Feminist theory and the body: A reader. New York: Routledge. 1999: 42-49.
    [8] Heimann, M. & Hübener, A. F. AI as Social Actor: A Lacanian Investigation into Social Technology[J]. Journal of digital social research. 2023, 5(1), 48-69. doi: 10.33621/jdsr.v5i1.159
    [9] Franks, D. D. Neurosociology: Fundamentals and current findings[M]. Springer. 2019: 43-45.
    [10] Leyzberg, D. Spaulding, S., Toneva, M. & Scassellati, B. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains[C]. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. 2012, 34(34): 1882-1887.
    [11] Baidoo-Anu, D. & Ansah, L. O. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning[J]. Journal of AI. 2023, 7(1), 52-62. doi: 10.61969/jai.1337500
    [12] Wang, J., Liu, T. & Wang, X. Human hand gesture recognition with convolutional neural networks for K-12 double-teachers instruction mode classroom[J]. Infrared physics & technology. 2020, 111: 1-7.
    [13] Schein, E. H. & Van Maanen, J. Career anchors and job/role planning[J]. Organizational dynamics, 2016, 45(3): 165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.07.002
    [14] Panova, O. B. Spirit and language in Hegel's philosophy of absolute spirit[J]. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 2015, 200: 502-508. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.008
    [15] Battestin, M. C. Sterne among the Philosophes: Body and Soul in A Sentimental Journey[J]. Eighteenth-Century fiction, 1994, 7(1), 17-36. doi: 10.1353/ecf.1994.0015
    [16] Lior, A. AI entities as AI agents: Artificial intelligence liability and the AI Respondeat Superior Analogy[J]. Mitchell hamline law review, 2020, 46(5): 1044-1100.
    [17] Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search[C]. In ACM Turing award lectures. 1975, 19(3): 113-126.
    [18] Barsalou, L. W. Grounded cognition[J]. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008, 59: 617-645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    [19] Zhang, C. & Lu, Y. Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects[J]. Journal of industrial information integration. 2021, 23: 1-9.
    [20] Li, J. & He, J. Research on AI-Assisted Teaching Mode for English Teaching from the Embodied Cognitive Perspective[C]. In International Conference on Innovative Computing. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 2022: 294-299.
    [21] Shin, J., Chen, F., Lu, C., & Bulut, O. Analyzing students' performance in computerized formative assessments to optimize teachers' test administration decisions using deep learning frameworks[J]. Journal of computers in education. 2022, 9(1): 71-91. doi: 10.1007/s40692-021-00196-7
    [22] Mutasa, S., Sun, S., & Ha, R. Understanding artificial intelligence-based radiology studies: What is overfitting?[J]. Clinical imaging. 2020, 65: 96-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.025
    [23] Brooks, R. A. Intelligence without representation[J]. Artificial intelligence. 1991, 47(1-3), 139-159. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M
    [24] Zebrowski, R. In Dialogue with the World: Merleau-Ponty, Rodney Brooks and Embodied Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of consciousness studies. 2010, 17(7-8): 156-172.
    [25] Kozma, R. & Freeman, W. J. Cognitive phase transitions in the cerebral cortex-enhancing the neuron doctrine by modeling neural fields[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 2016: 6.
    [26] Padmakumar, A. Thomason, J., Shrivastava, A., et al. Teach: Task-driven embodied agents that chat[C]. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2022, 36(2): 2017-2025.
    [27] Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. What is agency?[J]. American journal of sociology, 1998, 103(4): 962-1023. doi: 10.1086/231294
    [28] Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. The extended mind[J]. Analysis. 1998, 58(1): 7-19. doi: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
    [29] Leyzberg D, Spaulding S, Toneva M, et al. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains[C] //Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. 2012, 34(34): 1882-1887.
    [30] Du Boulay, B. Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant[J]. IEEE intelligent systems. 2016, 31(6): 76-81. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2016.93
    [31] Floridi, L. The ethics of information[M]. New York: Oxford University Press. 2013.
    [32] Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. The ethics of artificial intelligence[M]. New York: The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. 2018.
    [33] Moor, J. H. The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics[J]. IEEE intelligent systems, 2006, 21(4), 18-21. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2006.80
    [34] Arshinov, V., Chapny, E. & Chekletsov, V. Intersubjectivity and Complexity in Human Enhancement Problem[C]. In Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy. 2018, 3: 11-13.
    [35] Kim, Y., Soyata, T. & Behnagh, R. F. Towards emotionally aware AI smart classroom: Current issues and directions for engineering and education[C]. IEEE Access. 2018, 6: 5308-5331.
    [36] Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Westerman, D., et al. Initial expectations, interactions, and beyond with social robots[J]. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019, 90: 308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.042
    [37] Holstein, K. & Aleven, V. Designing for human–AI complementarity in K-12 education[J]. AI Magazine. 2022, 43(2), 239-248. doi: 10.1002/aaai.12058
    [38] Wiener, N. Some Moral and Technical Consequences of Automation: As machines learn they may develop unforeseen strategies at rates that baffle their programmers[J]. Science, 1960, 131(3410): 1355-1358. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3410.1355
    [39] Fuhai S, Ruixing Y. Moral Status Consideration of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Science & Education. 2021, 32: 1-17.
    [40] Borgmann A. So who am I really? Personal identity in the age of the Internet[J]. AI & Society. 2013, 28: 15-20.
    [41] Featherstone, M. & Turner, B. S. Body & society: An introduction[J]. Body & Society. 1995, 1(1): 1-12.
    [42] 曾文婕, 周子仪. 从"育分"到"育人"——中国式教育评价现代化道路探析[J]. 现代教育论丛, 2023(2): 86-92. http://xdjylc.scnu.edu.cn/article/id/11945bc5-d0f3-4b93-8919-4c1f592e84a7
  • 加载中
图(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  7
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-09-12
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-05-28
  • 刊出日期:  2025-04-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回