地方高校教育博士培养如何特色化发展——基于美国两类研究型大学比较的视角

王飞

地方高校教育博士培养如何特色化发展——基于美国两类研究型大学比较的视角

王飞

山东师范大学教育学部, 山东济南 250014

基金项目:

2020年国家社科基金一般项目“新时代我国乡村教师社会形象的建构” BAA200026

详细信息

作者简介:
王飞, 男, 河北保定人, 山东师范大学教育学部教授, 研究方向为课程与教学论、学位与研究生教育, 电子邮箱: wfwy2000@163.com

中图分类号: G643
计量
- 文章访问数: 6
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-09-25
- 网络出版日期: 2025-07-04
- 刊出日期: 2025-06-25

How to Develop the Distinctive Features of the Specialized Ed.D. Programs in Regional Universities? Insights from a Comparative Study of Two Types of U.S. Research Universities

WANG Fei

Faculty of Education, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China

摘要

摘要: 当前我国地方高校教育博士授权点数量已经超过部属高校。地方高校教育博士培养必须走出自身的特色化发展之路，否则可能出现与部属高校雷同，被视为部属高校教育博士“缩水版”的窘境。美国普通研究型大学在教育博士培养过程中历经了单纯模仿到自主创新的发展之路：最初单纯的模仿虽然帮助普通研究型大学建构了初步的培养体系，但由于受软硬件条件限制以及无法与区域教育需求相衔接导致人才培养质量低下；在痛定思痛后，普通研究型大学开始走上了特色化发展之路，通过主动契合地方教育发展需要、确立实践性人才培养定位、提高师资实践素养等赢得了社会认可和良好声誉。借鉴经验，我国地方高校教育博士培养应着力创建特色化发展之路，注重发挥比较优势，主动贴近区域教育实际，在保证培养质量的基础上，确立有别于部属高校的教育博士培养定位，明确为区域培养高端应用型教育人才的培养目标以及建立着力提升教育博士生实践理性的培养模式。
- 地方高校 /
- 教育博士 /
- 特色化发展 /
- 比较优势 /
- 实践理性
Abstract: At present, the number of authorized Ed.D. (Doctor of Education) programs in China's regional universities has surpassed that in ministry-affiliated universities. To avoid becoming perceived as mere "watered-down versions" of their counterparts in ministry-affiliated universities, regional universities must forge their own distinctive developmental path for Ed.D. programs. In the process of cultivating education PhDs, ordinary research universities in the United States have gone through a development path from simple imitation to independent innovation. Initial imitation helped establish a foundational training system, yet limitations in resources (both hard and soft) and a failure to align with regional educational needs resulted in subpart graduate quality. Following profound reflection, these universities embarked on a path of specialized development. By proactively addressing local educational needs, establishing a practice-oriented talent cultivation orientation, and enhancing faculty practical expertise, they earned societal recognition and built strong reputations. This enlightens that the education doctoral training in local universities in China should focus on creating a distinctive development path, emphasizing the utilization of comparative advantages, actively approaching regional education realities, and establishing a positioning for education doctoral training distinct from ministry-affiliated universitie on the basis of ensuring the quality of training. The training objectives should be to cultivate high-end applied education talents for the region, and efforts should be made to enhance the practical rationality of education doctoral students.
- Regional universities /
- Doctor of education(Ed.D.) /
- Specialized development /
- Comparative advantage /
- Practical rationality

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

[1]	中共中央, 国务院. 关于全面深化新时代教师队伍建设改革的意见[EB/OL]. (2018-01-31)[2024-09-01]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-01/31/content_5262659.htm.
[2]	教育部, 国家发展改革委, 财政部, 人力资源社会保障部, 中央编办. 教师教育振兴行动计划(2018-2022年)[EB/OL]. (2018-03-23)[2024-09-01]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/201803/t20180323_331063.html.
[3]	国务院学位委员会, 教育部. 专业学位研究生教育发展方案(2020-2025)[EB/OL]. (2020-09-30)[2024-09-01]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/202009/t20200930_492590.html.
[4]	王飞. 地方大学教育博士专业学位的发展定位[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2019(1): 14-19.
[5]	United States Department of Education. Digest of Education Statistics 2019[R]. Washington D.C. : U.S. Department of Education, 2021: 228.
[6]	李云鹏. 美国教育博士培养的近百年经验[J]. 中国高教研究, 2013(5): 37-42.
[7]	徐铁英. 透视美国教育博士学位: 历史变迁与发展趋势[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2012(6): 69-74.
[8]	褚艾晶. "教育博士"培养的合法性危机——基于美国现实面临的问题与挑战[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2008(3): 70-74.
[9]	邓涛, 孔凡琴. 美国教育博士专业学位教育的问题与改革论争[J]. 比较教育研究, 2009, (4): 28-32.
[10]	GERALDINE J C, JAMES W G. Ed school: a brief for professional education[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988: 92.
[11]	Harvard Graduate School of Education. Doctoral Degree Programs: Doctor of Education Leadership[EB/OL]. (2022-12-31)[2024-09-01]. https://www.gse.harvard.edu/doctorate/doctor-education-leadership.
[12]	University of Pennsylvania. Educational Leadership, EdD[EB/OL]. (2023-01-01)[2024-09-04]. https://catalog.upenn.edu/graduate/programs/educational-leadership-edd/.
[13]	Portland State University. Educational Leadership Doctorate Overview[EB/OL]. (2022-12-01)[2024-09-04]. https://www.pdx.edu/academics/programs/graduate/educational-leadership.
[14]	Arizona State University. Program Description[EB/OL]. (2022-12-02)[2024-09-04]. https://webapp4.asu.edu/programs/t5/majorinfo/ASU00/TEINNPAEDD/graduate/false?init=false&nopassive=true.
[15]	Kansas State University. Curriculum Requirements[EB/OL]. (2023-01-01)[2024-09-04]. https://coe.ksu.edu/academics/graduate-programs/educational-leadership-doctorate/.
[16]	Iowa State University. Ed. D. in Education[EB/OL]. (2018-11-01)[2024-09-04]. https://education.iastate.edu/graduate-students/graduate
[17]	Wichita State University. EdD in Educational Leadership Program Course Requirements, Emphases, and Events[EB/OL]. (2022-12-20)[2024-09-04]. https://www.wichita.edu/academics/applied_studies/isle/_documents/EdD_Program_Course_Requirements.pdf.
[18]	San Diego State University. Course Sequence and Learning Objectives[EB/OL]. (2022-12-20)[2024-09-05]. https://education.sdsu.edu/edl/programs-of-study/dr-edd-edl-pk-12/course-sequence.
[19]	Portland State University. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP DOCTORATE OVERVIEW[EB/OL]. (2023-01-01)[2024-09-05]. https://www.pdx.edu/education/academics/programs/graduate/educational-leadership.
[20]	Iowa State University. Curriculum[EB/OL]. (2022-12-20)[2024-09-05]. https://education.iastate.edu/graduate-students/graduate-programs/division-of-teaching-learning-leadership-and-policy/ed-d-in-education/curriculum/.
[21]	宋萑, 王晓阳, 赵娜. 循证教育博士培养的理论模式建构[J]. 教师教育研究, 2020(6): 14-20.
[22]	Kansas State University. Department of Educational Leadership Faculty and Staff[EB/OL]. (2022-12-31)[2024-09-05]. https://coe.ksu.edu/about/people/directory/educational-leadership.html.
[23]	San Diego State University. Educational Leadership[EB/OL]. (2022-12-31)[2024-09-05]. https://education.sdsu.edu/directory/edl.
[24]	Iowa State University. Faculty and Staff[EB/OL]. (2022-12-31)[2024-09-05]. https://hs.iastate.edu/directory/.
[25]	Arizona State University. MLFTC faculty[EB/OL]. (2022-12-30)[2024-09-07]. https://education.asu.edu/about/people/faculty?dept=192466&id=1.
[26]	Portland State University. Faculty Profiles[EB/OL]. (2023-01-01)[2024-09-07]. https://www.pdx.edu/education/faculty-profile-search?faculty_name=&field_last_name_value_1=All&discipline=1096.
[27]	Arkansas State University. FACULTY[EB/OL]. (2023-01-01)[2024-09-07]. https://degree.astate.edu/faculty/.
[28]	Idaho State University. Graduate Faculty[EB/OL]. (2023-02-10)[2024-09-07]. http://coursecat.isu.edu/graduate/graduatefaculty/.
[29]	University of Southern California. Leading Instructional Change[EB/OL]. (2023-00-03)[2024-09-07]. https://rossier.usc.edu/programs/doctoral/ed-leadership/concentrations/.
[30]	University of Tennessee. Faculty[EB/OL]. (2022-12-31)[2024-09-07]. https://education.utexas.edu/departments/educational-leadership
[31]	University of California. Our Faculty[EB/OL]. (2022-12-30)[2024-09-07]. https://seis.ucla.edu/faculty-and-research/faculty-directory?programs=Educational+Leadership+Program.
[32]	Vanderbilt University. Faculty[EB/OL]. (2023-01-01)[2024-09-07]. https://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/programs/doctor-of-education-edd/.
[33]	Harvard Graduate School of Education. Program Faculty[EB/OL]. (2022-12-20)[2024-09-07]. https://www.gse.harvard.edu/doctorate/doctoreducation-leadership.
[34]	王坦. 我国教育博士培养的现实困境与对策——基于两批27所试点授权单位的实证性分析[J]. 现代教育管理, 2020(9): 122-128.