新加坡教育分流制度审视：新自由主义下的效率与公平

陈衍; 柯雨婷

新加坡教育分流制度审视：新自由主义下的效率与公平

陈衍,
柯雨婷

浙江工业大学职业技术教育学院，浙江杭州 310023

基金项目:

2023年度温州市哲学社会科学规划重大课题“温州民营经济与职业教育融合发展研究” 23WSKZD06

详细信息

作者简介:
陈衍，男，宁夏彭阳人，浙江工业大学职业技术教育学院教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为职业技术教育政策、评价和比较教育，电子邮箱：vetcy@vip.163.com

柯雨婷，女，安徽合肥人，浙江工业大学职业技术教育学院硕士研究生，主要研究方向为职业教育比较

中图分类号: G512.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 189
- HTML全文浏览量: 176
- PDF下载量: 31
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-11-07
- 网络出版日期: 2024-05-11
- 刊出日期: 2024-04-25

Examining the Education Streaming System in Singapore: Efficiency and Equity under Neoliberalism

CHEN Yan,
KE Yuting

College of Vocational and Technical Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310023, China

摘要

摘要: 对于新加坡来说，新自由主义不仅是一种经济原则，而且是一种隐藏在其政治体制下与政府所秉持的实用主义相耦合的治理模式。这样的政治经济制度促使新加坡教育追求效率，采用竞争性的教育分流制度。同时，精英主义下的教育分流制度也利用新自由主义治理技术使其被普罗大众所接受、信任和遵循。新自由主义下竞争激烈的教育分流制度是一把双刃剑。一方面，其提高了教育效率、释放了个人的自由与能力，因此被认为能够最大化社会效能；如果形成良性循环，社会将整体受益。但另一方面，如果把所有控制权抛给自由市场，则会导致教育不平等和社会分化。虽然新加坡一贯重视教育所带来的经济效益，强调精英教育的重要性，但是从近年来对分流制度大刀阔斧的改革可以看出，新加坡政府越来越重视分流制度带来的教育公平问题，致力于将追求效率的精英教育与追求公平的包容性教育相结合，促进教育的良性发展。
- 新加坡 /
- 新自由主义 /
- 教育分流 /
- 社会分化 /
- 教育公平
Abstract: Neoliberalism in Singapore is both an economic principle and a mode of governance under its political system, which is related to the pragmatism upheld by its government. It is such a system that drives Singapore to pursue efficiency in education and adopt a competitive educational split-flow system in the country. In addition, the education diversion system under elitism also uses neoliberal governance techniques to make it acceptable, trusted and followed by the public. It is like a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it increases the efficiency of education and releases the freedom and ability of individuals, thus optimizing the effectiveness of society as a whole. And if a virtuous circle is formed, society will be beneficial as a whole. On the other hand, if the market holds the whole controlling right, it would undoubtedly lead to educational inequality and social polarization. Although Singapore has always focused on the economic benefits of education brought by education and emphasized the importance of elite education, the radical reform of the streaming system in recent years shows that the government is paying more and more attention to equity in education brought about by its educational split-flow system. Singapore is committed to integrating the elite education in pursuit of efficiency with the equitable education in pursuit of inclusivity, aiming to promote the healthy development of education.
- Singapore /
- Neo-liberalism /
- Education streaming system /
- Social differentiation /
- Educational equity

HTML全文

参考文献(35)

[1]	EUGENE D L. The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case study[J]. Critical sociology, 2011, 38(2): 241–264.
[2]	BENGHUAT C. Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore[M]. London & New York: Routledge, 1995: 58-59.
[3]	LICHING H, THERESA A M. Civic disparities: exploring students' perceptions of citizenship within Singapore's academic tracks[J]. Theory and research in social education, 2011, 39(1): 298–316.
[4]	GOPINATHAN S. Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: a thesis revisited[J]. Globalisation, societies and education, 2007, 5 (1): 53–70. doi: 10.1080/14767720601133405
[5]	MICHEL F. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison[M]. New York: vintage books, 1979.
[6]	TERRY F. Six Theories of neoliberalism[J]. Thesis eleven, 2014, 122 (1): 49–71. doi: 10.1177/0725513614535965
[7]	WENDY B. Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics[M]. Princeton: princeton university press, 2005: 23-35.
[8]	CHIANG T H. Pursuing ideology or conforming reality: why does education shift its function from equity to competitiveness in the era of globalization?[J]. Journal of global economy, 2013, 9(4): 267-278.
[9]	AARON K. Singapore's 'global assemblage': digging into the culture of education policy making[J]. Critical studies in education, 2011(52): 267-278.
[10]	PAKTEE N. Learning from Singapore: the power of paradoxes[M]. New York: Routledge, 2017.
[11]	莫荣. 新加坡职业教育培训的经验与启示[M]. 新加坡: 焦点出版社, 2013: 56.
[12]	HURSH D. Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies[J]. American educational research journal, 2007(44): 493-518.
[13]	公钦正, 张海生. 高等教育国家品牌如何形塑——基于信号理论的新加坡个案研究[J]. 现代大学教育, 2021, 37(4): 66-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSJG202104009.htm
[14]	BENGHUAT C. Liberalism disavowed: communitarianism and state capitalism in Singapore[M]. Ithaca & London: Cornell university press, 2017: 645-647.
[15]	KENNETH PAUL T. Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: ideological shifts in Singapore[J]. International political science review, 2008, 29 (1): 7-27. doi: 10.1177/0192512107083445
[16]	WONG B. Political meritocracy in Singapore: lessons from the PAP government[A]. In D. Bell and C. Li (eds. ). The East Asian challenge for democracy: political meritocracy in comparative perspective[C]. London: Cambridge university press. 2013: 288-313.
[17]	IRENE N. Education and intergenerational mobility in Singapore[J]. Educational review, 2014 (66): 362-376.
[18]	EUGENE DILI L. The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case study[J]. Critical sociology, 2011, 38 (2): 241–264.
[19]	MICHEL F. The hermeneutics of the subject[M]. New York: Picador, 2005: 13-20.
[20]	MICHEL F. The birth of biopolitics[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010: 32-42.
[21]	MICHAEL D B, ZLATKO S. Constructing Singapore: elitism, ethnicity and the nation-building project[M]. Copenhagen: Nias press, 2008: 34-35.
[22]	OECD. Equity in education[R/OL]. (2018-10-23)[2021-4-10]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264073234-en.
[23]	JANICE H, ANDREA O. If only Singaporeans stopped to think[N]. The straits times, 2013-08-23.
[24]	CHANG C. Graduate dads, brighter kids[N]. The straits times, 2011-01-26.
[25]	MAKRIS M V. The chimera of choice: gentrification, school choice, and community[J]. Peabody journal of education, 2018, 93 (4): 411–429.
[26]	SUSAN R R. My so-called choice: the trappings of school choice for non-admits[J]. The urban review, 2010, 42 (1): 1–21.
[27]	JOHN F. Social capital. 2nd ed[M]. New York: Routledge, 2008: 16-20.
[28]	姜添辉. 新自由主义治理性视角下的全球化教育改革运动[J]. 教育学报, 2020, 16(2): 3-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKJY202002001.htm
[29]	YUEN C T. Society must keep social networks open[N]. The straits times, 2018-05-17.
[30]	王维军, 苑津山. 从精英化到普及化: 新加坡推进高等教育入学公平的行动、原则与启示[J]. 高校教育管理, 2023, 17(2): 26-34+103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSK202302003.htm
[31]	MOE SINGAPORE. MOE FY2022 Committee of Supply Debate Response by Minister for Education Chan Chun Sing[EB/OL]. (2022-03-07)[2023-06-05]. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/20220307-moe-fy2022-committee-of-supply-debate-response-by-minister-for-education-chan-chun-sing.
[32]	NUS. Aptitude-based admissions scheme (ABAS)[EB/OL]. (2022-03-01)[2023-6-1]. https://medicine.nus.edu.sg/prospectivestudents,aptitudebasedadmissionsschemeabas/.
[33]	MOE SINGAPORE. Learn for life: forging our collective future-nurturing diverse talents and expanding pathways[EB/OL]. (2022-03-01)[2023-06-05]. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/20230301-learn-for-life-forging-our-collective-future-nurturing-diverse-talents-and-expanding-pathways.
[34]	MOE SINGAPORE. Opening address by minister Chan Chun Sing at the straits times education forum[EB/OL]. (2023-03-11)[2023-06-05]. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/20230311-opening-address-by-minister-chan-chun-sing-at-the-straits-times-education-forum.
[35]	陈衍, 郭珊, 徐梦佳. 高等职业教育也需要加强"双一流"建设[J]. 中国高等教育, 2017(12): 40-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDJ201712020.htm