The Ecology and the Unexpected Consequence in Baoyan Involution:A Study of Students' Experiencesof Baoyan in an Elite University
-
摘要:
内卷"一词被用于描述精英大学普遍存在的过度竞争生态,而保研是观察这一生态的重要窗口。通过对北京市某双一流高校8位本科生保研历程的深度访谈发现,保研中的内卷生态具体表现为"抢好分"、拼筹码和竞争性攀比。绩效主义取向的积分式保研规则促成褒奖与贬抑效应,加剧了个体的自我剥削,极易将学生引向精神世界的"空心化",铸造"精致的利己主义者"和"内卷型"人格,既危及学生身心健康,也给国家长期的人才选拔和培养种下选才单一化、功利化的苦果。超越"内卷"既需要个体觉醒,更依赖高等院校乃至全社会的制度变革与文化重塑。
Abstract:At present, the term "involution" is used to describe the excessive competition phenomena of elite universities, and "Baoyan" is an important aspect of this phenomena. Based on the in-depth interviews with eight undergraduate students in a "Double First-Class" university in Beijing, it is found that the excessive competition is embodied in "grabbing good points", bargaining chips and competing comparison. The performance oriented rules of "Baoyan" lead to commendatory and derogatory effects, aggravating the individual's self exploitation, which easily lead the students to "hollow" in the spiritual world, and cast "exquisite egoists" and involution personality. It not only endangers the physical and mental health of students and damages the spirite of knowledge, but also brings the long-term talent selection and cultivation of society and country the bitter fruit of single talent selection and utilitarianism. As individuals, college students are not only being trapped, but also reflecting on themselves, and trying to break through. Transcending the involution needs individual awakening, as well as ultimately depending on the institutional change and cultural remodeling of universities and even the whole society.
-
Key words:
- involution /
- Baoyan /
- competion /
- involutional personality /
- institutional transformation
-
[1] 徐菁菁.绩点为王:中国顶尖高校年轻人的囚徒困境[EB/OL].[2020-09-19]. https://mp. weixin. qq. com/s/ilNVG-fabWHU34De5NPGSA. [2] 蒋方舟,严飞."内卷"到底在卷什么[EB/OL].[2021-02-24]. https://mp. weixin. qq. com/s/UYg9lx-qd3-D7H65HbQ_aw. [3] 刘世定,邱泽奇."内卷化"概念辨析[J].社会学研究, 2004(5):96-110. [4] Clifford Geertz. Agricultural Involution[M]. Berkeley and Los Angeles:university of california press, 1966:1-103. [5] 黄宗智.小农经济理论与"内卷化"及"去内卷化"[J].开放时代, 2020(04):126-139. [6] 黄宗智.长江三角洲小农家庭与乡村发展[M].北京:中华书局, 2000:427. [7] 杜赞奇.文化、权力与国家:1900-1942年的华北农村[M].王福明译.南京:江苏人民出版社, 2004:66-68. [8] 杨可.母职的经纪人化——教育市场化背景下的母职变迁[J].妇女研究论丛, 2018(02):79-90. [9] 黄宗智.再论内卷化、兼论去内卷化[J].开放时代, 2021(01):157-169. [10] 《咬文嚼字》编辑部. "2020十大流行语"[EB/OL].[2020-12-04]. https://mp. weixin. qq. com/s/Qyq2vOi0oXOtquWq0UfjZw. [11] 徐英瑾.数字拜物教:"内卷化"的本质[J].探索与争鸣, 2021(03):65. [12] 韩志明.小心翼翼的行动者:社区治理的内卷化叙事——以S市Y区"睦邻门"案例为例[J].中国行政管理, 2020(12):69-75. [13] 徐清秀.目标替代、惯习区隔与教师职称评定的内卷化——基于T乡镇中学的考察[J].北京社会科学, 2021(4):116-128. [14] 编辑部.学术研究当力避内卷化[J].社会科学, 2021(2):2. [15] 陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社, 2000:12. [16] 杨善华,孙飞宇.作为意义探究的深度访谈[J].社会学研究, 2005(5):53-66+244. [17] 芊霓(来自豆瓣).人类学家项飙谈内卷:一种不允许失败和退出的竞争[EB/OL].[2020-10-22]. https://www. douban. com/note/781577426/. [18] [美]威廉·德雷谢维奇.优秀的绵羊[M].林杰,译.北京:九州出版社, 2016:14-21. [19] 南方都市报. 20位新教师19位是清北硕博,深圳一中学火了,简历全曝光[EB/OL]. https://mp. weixin. qq. com/s/iRz3ao-qxWwlmOPbj-Jrag. [20] 彭怡. 2021考研风向标[N].光明日报, 2020-12-26(11). [21] 张笑晨,严飞.社会结构让人不得不"内卷化"[EB/OL].[2020-12-02]. https://www. huxiu. com/article/397631. html. [22] 玛丽·道格拉斯.洁净与危险——对污染和禁忌观念的分析[M].商务印书馆, 2018:124+147. [23] 迈克尔·斯彭斯.市场信号传递:雇佣过程中的信息传递及相关筛选过程[M].北京,中国人民大学出版社, 2019:7-8+62. [24] Robert K. Merton. The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action[J]. American Sociological Review 1936, 1(6):894-904. [25] 中国青年报.中国大学生健康状况究竟如何?[EB/OL].[2020-01-07]. https://mp. weixin. qq. com/s/It1q70CyApM7FCWdPjLcTg. [26] 杨善华,谢立中.西方社会学理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2018:191. [27] 吕雨欣.乘着制度滑行:推免生和推免制度的互动[D].北京:北京师范大学教育学部, 2016:18. [28] 牛新春,杨菲,杨滢.保研制度筛选了怎样的学生——基于一所研究型大学的实证案例研究[J].教育发展研究, 2019(9):1-10. [29] Michael Poku. Campbell's Law:implications for health care[J]. Journal of Health Service Research&Policy, 2016, 21(2):137-139. [30] 孟子.孟子[M].颜兴林译注,南昌:二十一世纪出版社, 2014:48. [32] 康永久.教育制度:最重要的教育资源[J].教育与经济, 2011(3):18-21.
计量
- 文章访问数: 817
- HTML全文浏览量: 180
- PDF下载量: 139
- 被引次数: 0