The Disciplinary Community of Teacher Education in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in the Context of Regional Integration：Ideas and Approaches
-
摘要: 构建"教师教育学科共同体",是湾区高校整合优质学科资源的主观需求,是对区域经济社会和教育发展趋势及其客观规律的自觉把握,是提升港澳青少年国家认同意识并维护该区域长期繁荣稳定的重要推动力量。粤港澳同属岭南文化的地缘亲和,有助于触发形成三地高等教育的合作共识,也为学科结构调整目标的达成提供持续的内驱力。优化粤港澳大湾区教师教育学科结构,构建教师教育学科共同体,需要摈弃"临渊慕鱼"的惰性思维并坚定"退而结网"的决心智慧,需要有专门且专业的组织机构运筹帷幄和常态化的制度保驾护航,需要三地政府、高校、教育中间组织及区域社会所构建的新型"协同共生"型关系及其行动规则来维持和实现,形成一体化的发展理念、共生式的表达体系,助力湾区教师教育学科竞争力整体提升。Abstract: The concept of the "Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Teacher Education Discipline Community" is a historical reflection and practical need to aggregate high-quality resources of teacher education disciplines and cultivate outstanding teachers. The construction of a "teacher education subject community" is a subject demand of the universities, which can help integrate high-quality subject resources and help maintain the long-term prosperity and stability of the region. Geographical affinity and natural location advantages help to form the value resonance and cooperation consensus of universities in the three places and to provide a continuous internal drive for the achievement of discipline cooperation goals. To improve the disciplinary structure of teacher education in the Greater Bay Area and to build a community of teacher education disciplines, it is important to abandon the inertia and steadfast determination. A new "synergistic and symbiotic" relationship between the governments of the three regions, universities, educational intermediaries and the regional communities, as well as their rules of action, are needed to maintain and realize an integrated development concept and a symbiotic expression system, in order to contribute to the overall improvement of the competitiveness of the Bay Area teacher education disciplines.
-
[1] 中共中央、国务院.《粤港澳大湾区发展规划纲要》[EB/OL].(2019-02-18)[2021-09-21]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-02/18/content_5366593.htm#1. [2] MATIN R, SUNLEY P. Slow convergence:the new endogenous growth theory and regional development[J]. Economic geography, 2018, 74:201-227. [3] 许长青,卢晓中.粤港澳大湾区高等教育融合发展:理念、现实与制度同构[J].高等教育研究, 2019(1):28-36. [4] 李家新,谢爱磊,范冬清.区域化发展视角下的粤港澳大湾区高等教育合作:基础、困境与展望[J].复旦教育论坛, 2020(1):84-90. [5] 李晶,刘晖.粤港澳大湾区高等教育整合的逻辑与进路[J].高等教育研究, 2018(10):31-36. [6] WILLIAMSON J G. Regional inequalities and the process of national development[J]. Economic development and cultural change, 1995(13):1-84. [7] 杨允中,等.微型经济与微型经济学[M].澳门:澳门大学澳门研究中心, 2006:15. [8] 张红峰.澳门回归二十年来高等教育的回顾与展望[J].高等教育研究, 2019(12):1-8. [9] 李家新,谢爱磊,范冬清.区域化发展视角下的粤港澳大湾区高等教育合作:基础、困境与展望[J].复旦教育论坛, 2020(1):84-90. [10] 法媒:香港大学不够国际化7成外地生来自内地[EB/OL].(2016-11-26)[2019-01-06]. http://news.163.com/16/1126/00/C6OPLEF4000187V8_all.html. [11] 马早明.协同创新30年:粤港澳教师教育合作的回顾与前瞻[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(6):62-67. [12] 潘懋元,吴玫.高等学校分类与定位问题[J]复旦教育论坛, 2003, 48(3):8-9. [13] 李家新,谢爱磊,范冬清.区域化发展视角下的粤港澳大湾区高等教育合作:基础、困境与展望[J].复旦教育论坛, 2020(1):84-90. [14] 王坤.珠港澳高等教育联动发展的对策研究——基于创新驱动发展战略背景[J].特区经济, 2017(9):21-26. [15] Times higher education (THE)[EB/OL].[2020-10-18]. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings?site=cn. [16] 曾剑雄,齐方奕.以国际湾区经验推动粤港澳大湾区世界一流大学建设[J].中国高等教育评估, 2019(4):36-47. [17] 王善迈,崔玉平.教育资源优化配置:中国教育改革与发展中的经济学课题——王善迈教授专访[J].苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 2(4):67-72. [18] 李晶.改革开放四十年来粤港澳高等教育合作的回顾与前瞻[J].现代教育论坛, 2019(5):42-48. [19] 曹德明.博洛尼亚进程:欧洲国家重大的高等教育改革框架[J].德国研究, 2008(3):66-71. [20] 张伟坤.新时代与新师范:背景、理念及举措[J].高教探索, 2019(1):32-37. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 237
- HTML全文浏览量: 64
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
下载: