从学术与社会隔离到良好的同伴效应建立——终结择校热的学理分析

孙刚成; 宋晓鸽

从学术与社会隔离到良好的同伴效应建立——终结择校热的学理分析

延安大学教育科学学院, 延安 716000

详细信息

中图分类号: G639.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 250
- HTML全文浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-04
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-05

From Academic and Social Isolation to the Establishment of Good Peer Effect:An Academic Analysis of the Termination of School Choice Craze

摘要

摘要: 因其可能带来的积极影响,或者源于居住地、安全以及经济等方面的因素,择校成了众多家长、学生和政府普遍关注的问题,而且择校热的化解已经成为一个难题。但是,OECD的实证调查数据和大量学者的实证研究证实,从整体上或平均情况看,择校对成绩的改善和学生的发展不具有明显帮助,而且择校明显加剧了学术与社会隔离,从而引发了新的教育不公平和社会不公平。对因择校而加剧的学生之间的学术与社会隔离的分析,可以帮助人们更深刻地认识择校所带来的不良影响;继而深入认识同伴效应对消除学术与社会隔离并促进学生健康成长的价值,有利于提出建构良好同伴效应的策略和认识借助良好同伴效应化解择校热的基本理路。
- 学术隔离 /
- 社会隔离 /
- 同伴效应 /
- 择校热
Abstract: Because of its possible positive impact,or from factors such as residence,safety and economy,school choice has become a common concern of many parents,students and the government,and the resolution of school choice craze has become a difficult problem.However,the OECD's empirical survey data and a large number of scholars'empirical studies confirm that,on the whole or on average,school choice is not significantly helpful to the improvement of performance and the development of students,and school choice has significantly exacerbated the academic and social isolation,resulting in new educational and social inequities.The analysis of the academic and social isolation between students exacerbated by school choice can help people understand the adverse effects of school choice more deeply;then,to understand the value of peer effect in eliminating academic and social isolation and promoting the healthy growth of students in-depth,which will be conducive to put forward the strategies of building a good peer effect,and to understand the basic theoretical approach to resolve the school choice craze with the help of good peer effect.
- Academic isolation /
- Social isolation /
- Peer effect /
- School choice craze

HTML全文

参考文献(42)

[1]	BOESKENS L. Regulating publicly funded private schools:a literature review on equity and effectiveness[J]. OECD education working papers, 2016, 21(147):21.
[2]	URQUIOLA M. Competition among schools:traditional public and private schools[J]. Handbook of the economics of education, 2016(5):209-237.
[3]	EPPLE D, ROMANO R, URQUIOLA M. School vouchers:a survey of the economics literature[J]. Journal of economic literature, 2017, 55(2):441-492.
[4]	ABDULKADIROGLU A, PATHAK P, WALTERS C. Free to choose:can school choice reduce student achievement?[J]. American economic journal:applied economics, 2018, 10(1):175-206.
[5]	王超. 1906年旧金山日本学童教育隔离事件研究[D].太原:山西大学, 2019:19.
[6]	冯皓,陆铭.通过买房而择校:教育影响房价的经验证据与政策含义[J].世界经济, 2010(12):89-104.
[7]	叶晓阳. "以权择校":父母政治资本与子女择校[J].世界经济文汇, 2012(4):52-73.
[8]	吴遵民,沈俊强.论择校与教育公平的追求——从择校政策的演变看我国公立学校体制变革的时代走向[J].清华大学教育研究, 2006(6):111-118.
[9]	周群力,陆铭.拜年与择校[J].世界经济文汇, 2009(6):19-34.
[10]	EPPLE D, ROMANO R. Neighborhood schools, choice, and the distribution of educational benefits[J]. National bureau of economic research, 2003:227-286.
[11]	NECHYBA T. School finance, spatial income segregation, and the nature of communities[J]. Journal of urban economics, 2003, 54(1):61-88.
[12]	BLACK, SANDRA E, MACHIN S. Housing valuations of school performance[J]. Handbook of the economics of education, 2011(3):485-519.
[13]	郭星华,储卉娟.从乡村到都市:融入与隔离——关于民工与城市居民社会距离的实证研究[J].江海学刊, 2004(3):91-98.
[14]	格奥尔格·齐美尔.现代性的诊断[M].成伯清,译.杭州:杭州大学出版社, 1999:162-165.
[15]	ROBERT E P. Race and culture[M]. New York:The Free Press, 1950:257.
[16]	许传新.融入还是隔离?——公立学校流动人口子女与城市学生社会距离实证研究[J].教育学报, 2009, 5(3):68-75.
[17]	BURKE M, SASS T. Classroom peer effects and student achievement[J]. Journal of labor economics, 2013, 31(1):51-82.
[18]	LAVY V, SILVA O, WEINHARDT F. The Good, the bad, and the average:evidence on ability peer effects in schools[J]. Journal of labor economics, 2012, 30(2):367-414.
[19]	MENDOLIA S, PALOYO A, WALKER I. Heterogeneous effects of high school peers on educational outcomes[J]. Oxford economic papers, 2018(70):3-43.
[20]	OECD. Balancing school choice and equity:an international perspective based on PISA[M]. Paris:OECD Publishing, 2019:48.
[21]	CHRISTINE H. Peer groups and children's development[M]. New Jersey:Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[22]	OECD. Responsive school systems:connecting facilities, sectors and programmes for student success[M]. Paris:OECD Publishing, 2018:24.
[23]	SACERDOTE B. Peer effects in education:how might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far?[J]. Handbook of the economics of Education, 2011(3):249-277.
[24]	陆铭,张爽. "人以群分":非市场互动和群分效应的文献评论[J].经济学(季刊), 2007(3):991-1020.
[25]	杜育红,袁玉芝.教育中的同伴效应研究述评:概念、模型与方法[J].教育经济评论, 2016(3):34-67.
[26]	HOXBY C. Peer effects in the classroom:learning from gender and race variation[J]. National bureau of economic research, 2000:1-54.
[27]	HARRIS J R. The nurture assumption:why children turn out the way they do[M]. London:Bloomsbury, 1998:241.
[28]	MONROE W F. Social consciousness in children[J]. Psychological review, 1898(5):68-70.
[29]	WOODWARD L J, FERGUSSON D M. Childhood peer relationship problems and later risks of educational under-achievement and unemployment[J]. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 2000(41):191-201.
[30]	BUHS E S, LADD G W. Peer rejection as an antecedent of young children's school adjustment:an examination of mediating processes[J]. Developmental psychology, 2001(37):550-560.
[31]	AZMITIA M, COOPER C R. Good or bad?Peer influences on Latino and European American adolescents'pathways through school[J]. Journal of education for students placed at risk, 2001(6):45-71.
[32]	皮亚杰.儿童的心理发展[M].傅统先,译.济南:山东教育出版社, 1982:39.
[33]	ANGRIST J D, LANG K. Does school integration generate peer effects?Evidence from Boston's Metco program[J]. American economic review, 2004, 94(5):1613-1634.
[34]	WEILI D, LEHRER S F. Do peers affect student achievement in China's secondary schools?[J]Review of economics and statistics, 2007, 89(2):300-312.
[35]	CARMAN K G, ZHANG L. Classroom peer effects and academic achievement:evidence from a Chinese middle school[J]. China economic review, 2012(23):223-237.
[36]	IMBERMAN S A, KUGLER A D, SACERDOTE B I. Katrina's children:evidence on the structure of peer effects from hurricane evacuees[J]. American economic review, 2012, 102(5):2048-2082.
[37]	杨钋.同伴特征与初中学生成绩的多水平分析[J].北京大学教育评论, 2009(4):50-64.
[38]	曹妍.大陆移民学生如何影响香港本地学生的学业成就?——基于PISA数据的同伴效应实证研究[J].教育与经济, 2013(4):47-55.
[39]	MCPHERSON M, SMITH-LOVIN L, COOK J M. Birds of a feather:homophily in social networks[J]. Annual review of sociology, 2001(27):415-444.
[40]	陈云松.逻辑、想象和诠释:工具变量在社会科学因果推断中的应用[J].社会学研究, 2012(6):192-216.
[41]	ROSRTH C J, JOHNSON D W, JOHNSON R T. Promoting early adolescents'achievement and peer relationships:the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures[J]. Psychological bulletin, 2008(134):223-246.
[42]	国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[N].人民日报, 2010-07-30(013).