“相对越界”与家校冲突——一项基于G市S校家校冲突档案的批判性话语分析

刘付齐; 谢爱磊; 席长华

“相对越界”与家校冲突——一项基于G市S校家校冲突档案的批判性话语分析

1. 广州大学教育学院, 广州 510006;
2. 广州大学粤港澳大湾区社会发展与教育政策研究院, 广州 510006

基金项目:

2019年度广东省哲学社会科学规划项目"城市中产阶层的教育焦虑:本质、成因及治理——基于广州和深圳等大城市的研究"(GD19CJY10)

详细信息

通讯作者:
谢爱磊,Email:xieailei@gzhu.edu.cn

中图分类号: G636
计量
- 文章访问数: 524
- HTML全文浏览量: 120
- PDF下载量: 50
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-03

“Claim Too Much Power”:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Home-School Conflicts in S School of G City

摘要

摘要: 本研究借助G市S校的档案资料，结合批判性话语分析解析了该校自2017年以来的15个家校冲突个案，尤为关注的是在具体的家校冲突事件中家长和学校的相关主体对自身立场的陈词及其背后潜藏的权力假设。数据分析显示，家长和学校的相关主体声称并加以实践的权力内容渗透至对方声称的界限内。我们将这一现象概念化为“相对越界”，指出其引发了对方对自身权力的维护和回应。本研究在理论上的新意在于，在分析家校冲突时强调从实在论向建构论的转向———双方对权力的理解相对主观且相互重叠，家长的权力观在一定程度上基于消费主义，而学校相关主体的权力观则在一定程度上基于专业主义。
- 家校冲突 /
- 批判性话语分析 /
- 消费主义 /
- 专业主义
Abstract: By using critical discourse analysis, this study tries to examine the causes of home-school conflicts in S school of G city. We pay particular attention to the statements of parents and teachers on their own positions and the power assumptions behind them in 15 home-school conflicts cases. The data analysis shows that the power claimed and exercised by parents and teachers are perceived by their counterparts as too much. We conceptualize this phenomenon as " Claim Too Much Power". The theoretical contribution of this study is that it emphasizes the shift from a realism perspective to a constructivism perspective in analyzing home -school conflicts. The power view of parents is based on consumerism to a certain extent, while the power view of school related subjects is based on professionalism to a certain extent.
- home-school conflict /
- critical discourse analysis /
- consumerism /
- professionalism

HTML全文

参考文献(48)

[1]	OECD. Let's Read Them a Story!The Parent Factor in Education[M]. Paris, France:OECD Publishing, 2012:39.
[2]	井光进,徐媛媛.构建社会广泛参与的教育治理新格局[J].教育家, 2020(12):42-43.
[3]	Saltmarsh S, McPherson A. Un/satisfactory encounters:Communication, conflict and parent-school engagement[J]. Critical Studies inEducation, 2019(4):1-16.
[4]	李勇,刘思硕.依法治校视野下"校闹"的内涵、成因及治理机制[J].青少年研究与实践, 2020, 35(03):78-83.
[5]	宋艳红.家长与教师之间冲突的社会学分析[D].首都师范大学, 2007:12.
[6]	徐国建.我国中小学家校冲突及其化解对策研究[D].曲阜师范大学, 2009:7.
[7]	章雨恬,蔡亚平.家校冲突的理性审视和解决策略[J].教育导刊, 2019(08):56-60.
[8]	梁亦华.家校冲突与冲突管理的质性研究[J].教育学报, 2015, 11(03):62-76.
[9]	崔树义.关于社会冲突的类型分析[J].社会主义研究, 1996(04):60-63.
[10]	吴虔.家长"越位"现象的思考与对策分析[J].江苏教育, 2016(63):58-59.
[11]	邓冰清.家校冲突问题及对策研究[D];华中师范大学, 2018:21.
[12]	翁明慧,王达.矛盾与和谐辩证统一视角下的和谐家校关系[J].学理论, 2016(09):211-212.
[13]	Vasquez-Salgado Y, Greenfield P M, Burgos-Cienfuegos R. Exploring home-school value conflicts:Implications for academic achievement and well-being among Latino first-generation college students[J]. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2015, 30(3):271-305.
[14]	边玉芳,刘小琪,王凌飞.当代我国中小学家校冲突的原因分析与应对建议[J].中国电化教育, 2021(05):27-32.
[15]	刘燕.小学家校合作中家长与教师教育观念冲突研究[D].西南大学, 2015:37-39.
[16]	Lasater K. Parent-Teacher Conflict Related to Student Abilities:The Impact on Students and the Family-School Partnership[J]. School Community Journal, 2016, 26(2):237-262.
[17]	钱亚玲.城市小学家校冲突及其化解对策研究[D].安庆师范大学, 2020:64.
[18]	高晓娜.小学家校冲突的成因及预防[J].教学与管理, 2019(23):4-6.
[19]	于丹丹,赵海楠.家校合作中主体与权责的边界问题思考[J].教学与管理, 2020(06):50-52.
[20]	王珏.民办学校家校冲突研究[D].南京师范大学, 2019:58-61.
[21]	Sanders M G, Epstein J L. School-family-community partnerships and educational change:International perspectives[M]. Extending educational change. Springer. 2005:202-222.
[22]	Blândul V C. The partnership between school and family-cooperation or conflict?[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012(47):1501-1505.
[23]	Mapp K L. Having their say:Parents describe why and how they are engaged in their children's learning[J]. School Community Journal, 2003, 13(1):35.
[24]	Bauch P A, Goldring E B. Teacher work context and parent involvement in urban high schools of choice[J]. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2000, 6(1):1-23.
[25]	Hoover-Dempsey K V, Bassler O C, Brissie J S. Parent involvement:Contributions of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics[J]. American Educational Research Journal, 1987, 24(3):417-435.
[26]	Bourdieu P. Sociology in question[M]. Sage, London:Sage Publications, 1993:73-76.
[27]	谢爱磊.农村学校家长参与的低迷现象研究--专业主义、不平等关系与家校区隔[J].全球教育展望, 2020, 49(03):42-56.
[28]	Xie A. Parental involvement in rural Anhui Province:Coping with the burden of guanxi[M]. Rural Education in China's Social Transition. Routledge. 2020:58-70.
[29]	Cave E. Consumerism in education[J]. Public Money&Management, 1989, 9(1):29-33.
[30]	Harvey J A. Marketing schools and consumer choice[J]. International Journal of Educational Management, 1996, 10(4):26-32.
[31]	Freeman I, Thomas M. Consumerism in education:A comparison between Canada and the United Kingdom[J]. International Journal of Educational Management, 2005, 19(2):153-177.
[32]	Stark J S. The many faces of consumerism[J]. New Directions for Higher Education, 1976,(13):89-100.
[33]	Crozier G. Parents and schools:Partnership or surveillance?[J]. Journal of Education Policy, 1998, 13(1):125-136.
[34]	Vincent C. Parents and Teachers:Power and Participation[M]. Psychology Press, 1996:30-41.
[35]	Delgado-Gaitan C. Involving parents in the schools:A process of empowerment[J]. American journal of Education, 1991, 100(1):20-46.
[36]	Smaill E. How much is too much?Partnerships and power relationships between parents and schools[J]. Journal of Initial Teacher Inquiry, 2015(1):62-64.
[37]	Crozier G. Empowering the powerful:A discussion of the interrelation of government policies and consumerism with social class factors and the impact of this upon parent interventions in their children's schooling[J]. British Journal of sociology of Education, 1997, 18(2):187-200.
[38]	Sumsion J, Goodfellow J. Parents as consumers of early childhood education and care:The feasibility of demand-led improvements to quality[M]. Sydney:Sydney University Press. 2009:167-197.
[39]	Meier C, Lemmer E. Parents as consumers:A case study of parent satisfaction with the quality of schooling[J]. Educational review, 2019, 71 (5):617-630.
[40]	Vincent C, Tomlinson S. Home-School Relationships:the swarming of disciplinary mechanisms?[J]. British Educational Research Journal, 1997, 23(3):361-377.
[41]	Bourke T, Lidstone J, Ryan M. Schooling teachers:Professionalism or disciplinary power?[J]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2015, 47 (1):84-100.
[42]	Boote D N. Teachers'professional discretion and the curricula[J]. Teachers and Teaching:Theory and practice, 2006, 12(4):461-478.
[43]	Cothran D J, Ennis C D. Students' and teachers' perceptions of conflict and power[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 1997, 13(5):541- 553.
[44]	Addi-Raccah A, Arviv-Elyashiv R. Parent empowerment and teacher professionalism:Teachers' perspective[J]. Urban Education, 2008, 43 (3):394-415.
[45]	Bæck U D K.'We are the professionals':a study of teachers'views on parental involvement in school[J]. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2010, 31(3):323-335.
[46]	Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis[J]. How to analyse talk in institutional settings:A casebook of methods, 2001:25-38.
[47]	Van Dijk T A. Discourse as structure and process[M]. Sage, London:Sage Publications, 1997:131.
[48]	Wodak R, Meyer M. Methods of critical discourse studies[M]. Sage, London:Sage Publications, 2015:3.