漂在北京：新自由主义治理术与教育培训机构讲师的主体性

潘冬冬; 周忆粟

漂在北京：新自由主义治理术与教育培训机构讲师的主体性

澳门大学教育学院，澳门 999078

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金2022年度教育学青年项目“‘双减’背景下学科类家教的治理路径研究” CFA220312

详细信息

作者简介:
潘冬冬，男，山西运城人，澳门大学教育学院博士后，主要研究方向为教育政策，电子邮箱：ddpan2020@163.com

周忆粟，男，上海人，澳门大学教育学院副教授，教育博士学位课程主任，博士，主要研究方向为教育政策

中图分类号: G451
计量
- 文章访问数: 289
- HTML全文浏览量: 200
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-05-22
- 网络出版日期: 2023-10-18
- 刊出日期: 2023-07-25

Drifting in Beijing: Neoliberal Governmentality and the Subjectivity of Tutors in Tutorial Centers

Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China

摘要

摘要: 以福柯新自由主义治理术为理论视角，通过对26位非北京户口的教育培训机构讲师进行访谈，探讨现行户籍制度对他们的影响。研究发现，教育培训机构讲师之所以选择漂在北京，主要是出于对收入和发展机会的考虑。在他们眼中，北京象征着年轻和拼搏、先进和前沿以及公平。他们并不过度追求和看中北京户口，而是认可靠自己的能力和努力来获取好的生活，其话语呈现为典型的能力至上和个体归因而非制度归因。然而，随着工作的开展以及年龄的增长，他们又逐渐感受到机构工作的不稳定和漂泊之下的巨大压力。他们成为教育培训机构讲师的职业选择呈现为一种受限制的、适应性的自由选择，而他们自身呈现出一种受限制的企业家主体、吊诡的半市民身份和漂泊的主体的形象。
- 新自由主义 /
- 治理术 /
- 教育培训 /
- 北漂 /
- 户口
Abstract: Drawing on Foucault's idea of neoliberal governmentality as a theoretical perspective, this paper discusses the impact of China's household registration (hukou) system on tutors through interviews with 26 tutors who are not registered in Beijing. The study finds that the reasons why tutors choose to drift in Beijing are mainly due to the consideration of income and career development opportunities. In their eyes, Beijing symbolizes youth and hard work, advancement and cutting-edge, and fairness. They do not pursue and value Beijing hukou excessively but recognize that they can obtain a good life by their own ability and effort. Their discourse presents characteristics of typical ability first and self-attribution rather than institutional attribution. However, with the development of work and the growth of age, they gradually feel the instability of working in tutorial centers and great pressure of drifting. Their choice of being tutors appears as a restricted and adaptive free choice. They present an image of a restricted entrepreneur, a paradoxical semi-citizen identity and a drifting subject.
- Neoliberalism /
- Governmentality /
- Tutoring /
- Beipiao /
- Hukou

HTML全文

参考文献(41)

[1]	STANDING G. The precariat: the new dangerous class[M]. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011: 1.
[2]	蔡禾. 新二元: 中国劳动力市场结构变迁[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2019(6): 17-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TSZM201906018.htm
[3]	中国教育学会. 中国中小学课外辅导行业研究报告[R]. 北京: 中国教育学会, 2016: 8.
[4]	姚晓丹. 转岗如何转出新舞台[N]. 光明日报, 2021-11-30(07).
[5]	沈原. 劳工社会学三十年[J]. 社会学评论, 2020(5): 3-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHPL202005001.htm
[6]	沈原, 闻翔. 转型社会学视野下的劳工研究[J]. 中国工人, 2014(5): 30-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNR201405008.htm
[7]	LIN X. 'Filial son', the family and identity formation among male migrant workers in urban China[J]. Gender, place & culture, 2014(6): 717-732.
[8]	陈映芳. "农民工": 制度安排与身份认同[J]. 社会学研究, 2005(3): 119-132+244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ200503005.htm
[9]	PUN N. Becoming dagongmei (working girls): the politics of identity and difference in reform China[J]. The China journal, 1999(42): 1-18.
[10]	WANG W W, FAN C C. Migrant workers' integration in urban China: experiences in employment, social adaptation, and self-identity[J]. Eurasian geography and economics, 2012(6): 731-749.
[11]	李培林, 田丰. 中国农民工社会融入的代际比较[J]. 社会, 2012(5): 1-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHEH201205003.htm
[12]	王春光. 新生代农民工城市融入进程及问题的社会学分析[J]. 青年探索, 2010(3): 5-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLTS201003004.htm
[13]	HUANG Z, WANG C L. Conspicuous consumption in emerging market: the case of Chinese migrant workers[J]. Journal of business research, 2018: 366-373.
[14]	余晓敏, 潘毅. 消费社会与"新生代打工妹"主体性再造[J]. 社会学研究, 2008(3): 143-171+245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ200803008.htm
[15]	HU B Y, SZENTE J. Education of young Chinese migrant children: challenges and prospects[J]. Early childhood education journal, 2010(6): 477-482.
[16]	项继权. 农民工子女教育: 政策选择与制度保障——关于农民工子女教育问题的调查分析及政策建议[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2005(3): 2-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZSD200503001.htm
[17]	DIERKES, J. Teaching in the shadow: operators of small shadow education institutions in Japan[J]. Asia pacific education review, 2010(1): 25-35.
[18]	HALLSEN S, KARLSSON M. Teacher or friend? — consumer narratives on private supplementary tutoring in Sweden as policy enactment[J]. Journal of education policy, 2019(5): 631-646.
[19]	YUNG K W H, YUAN R. 'The most popular star-tutor of English': discursive construction of tutor identities in shadow education[J]. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 2020(1): 153-168.
[20]	潘冬冬, 王默. 从公费师范生到补习讲师: 男性学前教师的职业选择与身份认同——基于新自由主义视角的个案剖析[J]. 学前教育研究, 2020(3): 31-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XQJY202003005.htm
[21]	DISKIN K. Private tutoring: an intersection of economic interests and social capital[D]. Minneapolis: College of Education, Walden University, 2010: 160-161.
[22]	SAAD-FILLO A, JOHNSTON D. Introduction[C] //. in SAAD-FILLO A, & JOHNSTON D (Eds. ). Neoliberalism: a critical reader. London: Pluto press, 2005: 1-6.
[23]	VENUGOPAL R. Neoliberalism as concept[J]. Economy and society, 2015(2): 165-187.
[24]	BRAEDLEY S, LUXTON M (Eds. ). Neoliberalism and everyday life[M]. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP, 2010.
[25]	MCGUIGAN J. The neoliberal self[J]. Culture unbound, 2014(1): 223-240.
[26]	FOUCAULT M. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008: 226.
[27]	MCNAY L. Self as enterprise: dilemmas of control and resistance in Foucault's The birth of biopolitics[J]. Theory, culture & society, 2009(6): 55-77.
[28]	LORENZINI D. Governmentality, subjectivity, and the neoliberal form of life[J]. Journal for cultural research, 2018(2): 154-166.
[29]	WRENN M. Identity, identity politics, and neoliberalism[J]. Panoeconomicus, 2014(4): 503-515.
[30]	亨利·吉鲁. 新自由主义的法西斯主义批判[J]. 吴万伟, 张琪译. 国外理论动态, 2018(12): 48-56.
[31]	HANLEY C. Neoliberalism, emotional experience in education and Adam Smith: reading The theory of moral sentiments alongside The wealth of nations[J]. Journal of educational administration and history, 2015(2): 105-116.
[32]	DAVIES W. Neoliberalism[C] //. TURNER B S (Ed. ). The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of social theory. Wiley Blackwell, 2017.
[33]	WANG F, LIU Y. Interpreting Chinese hukou system from a Foucauldian perspective[J]. Urban policy and research, 2018(2): 153-167.
[34]	HOFFMAN L. Autonomous choices and patriotic professionalism: on governmentality in late-socialist China[J]. Economy and society, 2006(4): 550-570.
[35]	WALLIS C. Technology and/as governmentality: the production of young rural women as low-tech laboring subjects in China[J]. Communication and critical/cultural studies, 2013(4): 341-358.
[36]	ZHANG L. Anxious China: Inner revolution and politics of psychotherapy[M]. University of California press, 2020.
[37]	国家统计局服务业司. 服务业在改革开放中快速发展擎起国民经济半壁江山[N]. 中国信息报, 2018-09-11(01).
[38]	王飞凌. 中国的户口制度及其变革[J]. 中国治理评论, 2014(1): 167-190.
[39]	BANSEL P. Subjects of choice and lifelong learning[J]. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 2007(3): 283-300.
[40]	PUN N. Made in China: women factory workers in a global workplace[M]. Durham: Duke university press, 2005.
[41]	王翔. 漂泊一代: 以"漂泊"为视角看中国当代青年主体[J]. 艺术广角, 2014(1): 12-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSGJ201401003.htm

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 289
HTML全文浏览量: 200
PDF下载量: 57
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

漂在北京：新自由主义治理术与教育培训机构讲师的主体性

作者简介:
潘冬冬，男，山西运城人，澳门大学教育学院博士后，主要研究方向为教育政策，电子邮箱：ddpan2020@163.com

周忆粟，男，上海人，澳门大学教育学院副教授，教育博士学位课程主任，博士，主要研究方向为教育政策

计量

Drifting in Beijing: Neoliberal Governmentality and the Subjectivity of Tutors in Tutorial Centers

计量

目录

留言板

漂在北京：新自由主义治理术与教育培训机构讲师的主体性

作者简介: 潘冬冬，男，山西运城人，澳门大学教育学院博士后，主要研究方向为教育政策，电子邮箱：ddpan2020@163.com 周忆粟，男，上海人，澳门大学教育学院副教授，教育博士学位课程主任，博士，主要研究方向为教育政策

计量

出版历程

Drifting in Beijing: Neoliberal Governmentality and the Subjectivity of Tutors in Tutorial Centers

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
潘冬冬，男，山西运城人，澳门大学教育学院博士后，主要研究方向为教育政策，电子邮箱：ddpan2020@163.com

周忆粟，男，上海人，澳门大学教育学院副教授，教育博士学位课程主任，博士，主要研究方向为教育政策