教育观念史研究方法微谈

曹春平; 祝贺

教育观念史研究方法微谈

曹春平^1,,
祝贺²

1.
扬州大学教育科学学院，江苏扬州 225009
2.
华东师范大学教育学部，上海 200062

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金2018年度教育学青年项目“重建时期以来美国的心智形塑观念” COA180245

详细信息

作者简介:
曹春平，女，湖南郴州人，扬州大学教育科学学院，讲师，教育学博士，研究方向为美国高等教育史，西方教育思想史，电子邮箱: ccping_2014@163.com

祝贺，女，河南郑州人，华东师范大学教育学部，副教授，教育学博士，研究方向为美国教育史

中图分类号: G40-03
计量
- 文章访问数: 560
- HTML全文浏览量: 166
- PDF下载量: 24
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-14
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-22
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-25

On Research Methods of the History of Educational Concepts

CAO Chunping^1
,,
ZHU He²

1.
School of Educational Science, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2.
Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

摘要

摘要: 教育观念史研究一般基于心物二元论将教育观念视为具有历史连贯性的自然之镜。观念史研究方法论上的文化转向挑战了传统的观念与自然关系预设，提示了教育观念史研究方法方向的两种可能转向。一是汲取语言学分析方法回归教育观念的原始语境，发掘语境之中的问题，关注与研究教育隐喻。二是借助话语分析方法，将教育观念视为特定言说社群在话语权力结构下的言说行动产物。此外，新物质主义方法论作为文化转向的补充，提供了文化-生物一元论的本体论视角。鉴于此，教育观念史研究可重新审视教育之中身体、物质与精神的关系。
- 观念史 /
- 文化转向 /
- 隐喻 /
- 新物质主义
Abstract: The study of the history of educational concepts is generally based on a mind-body dualism that views educational concepts as mirrors of nature with historical coherence. The cultural turn in the research methodology of the history of educational concepts challenges the presupposition of the relationship between traditional conceptions and nature, and suggests two possible directions for the methodological turn of the history of educational conceptions. The first is to draw on linguistic analysis to return to the original contexts of educational ideas, to uncover the problems within the contexts, and to focus on and study educational metaphors. The second is to draw on discourse analysis to consider educational ideas as the product of the discursive actions of specific discursive communities within a discursive power structure. In addition, the new materialist research methodology complements the cultural turn by providing an ontological perspective of cultural-biological monism. In this light, the study of the history of educational ideas can revisit the relationship between body, matter and spirit in education.
- History of ideas /
- Cultural turn /
- Metaphor /
- New materialism

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	张斌贤, 王晨. "大学'理念'考辨——兼论大学'理想'与大学'观念'"[J]. 江苏高教, 2005: 6-9.
[2]	理查德·罗蒂. 哲学与自然之镜[M]. 李幼蒸, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1979: 55.
[3]	钱宁峰. "观念史抑或概念史——评《观念史研究: 中国现代重要政治术语的形成》"[J]. 学术界, 2011, 155: 97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJI201104012.htm
[4]	KANT I. Critique of Pure Reason[M]. Penguin Books, 2007: 177-178.
[5]	康德. 三大批判合集(上)[M]. 邓晓芒, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 122-123.
[6]	VOSNIADOU S, Context and the development of metaphor comprehension[J]. Technical report, 1988, 444: 2.
[7]	昆廷·斯金纳. 国家与自由: 斯金纳访华讲演录[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018: 159-161.
[8]	拉里·西登托普. 发明个体——人在古典时代与中世纪的地位[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2021: 10, 13, 16.
[9]	TAYLOR C. Sources of the self[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989: 151, 153.
[10]	TURBAYNE C M, The myth of metaphor[M]. Now Haven and London: Tale University Press, 1962.
[11]	BUCK G. The metaphor: a study in the psychology of rhetoric[M]. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Inland Press, 1899: 3, 16-17.
[12]	GORDON P E, What is Intellectual History? A frankly partisan introduction to a frequently misunderstood field[EB/OL]. [2022-05-01]. https://max.book118.com/html/2017/1006/136284939.shtm.
[13]	张乐. 从"洪堡的教育观念"到"洪堡神话"——一个特定研究母题的系谱学分析[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2017(3): 10-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJPL201703004.htm
[14]	GILBERT R, LOW P. Discourse and power in education: analysis institutional processes in schools[J]. Australian educational researcher, 1994(3): 1-24.
[15]	COOLE D, FROST S. New materialisms: ontology, agency, and politics[M]. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2010: 8-9.
[16]	PITTS-TAYLOR V. Mattering: feminism, science, and materialism[M]. New York: New York University Press, 2016: 1-16.
[17]	陈康. 论希腊哲学[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1995: ii-iii.
[18]	张斌贤. 教育思想史与教育制度史的关系: 脱节与重构[J]. 教育史研究, 2021(4): 41-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYUY202104004.htm
[19]	特里·平卡德. 德国哲学1760—1860[M]. 侯震武, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 3.