Has the Power of Academic Committee Increased?——A study on the Power Allocation of Academic Committees in the “Post-regulation” Universities
-
摘要: 自《高等学校学术委员会规程》颁布实施以来，高校纷纷制定或修订学术委员会章程，建立健全学术委员会组织体系。本研究基于某研究型大学个案研究发现，随着学术委员会组织和制度的不断完善，学术委员会事务性决策权得到落实和扩大，但学术委员会制度性决策权难以得到保障，甚至呈现出弱化趋势。学术委员会制度供给、政府简政放权和资源配置方式是影响学术委员会权力配置的主要因素。Abstract: Since the "Regulation of Academic Committee in Higher Education" has been promulgated, higher education institutions have formulated or revised the regulation of academic committee and reformed the organizational system of academic committee. Based on a case study of a research-oriented university, this study identifies that with the continuous institutional improvement of academic committee, the committee's transactional decision -making power has been expanded, while its institutional decision-making power has weakened. The institutional supply, the streamlining of administration and delegating power, and the resource allocation configuration are the main factors that affect the power distribution of academic committee.
-
Key words:
- academic authority /
- academic committee /
- allocation of authority /
- post-regulation era
-
[1] 郭腾军, 方丽. 高校学术委员会学术权力效力研究——基于69所研究型大学学术委员会章程的内容分析[J]. 高教探索, 2018(2):17-22. [2] 蔡国春. 论高校学术委员会制度的建构与重构——基于学术权力独立性与统整性的考量[J]. 高等教育研究, 2019(1):22-27. [3] 胡敏. 高校资源配置的府学关系及其"放管服"改革[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2017(3):46-52. [4] 熊进. 高等教育治理的"项目制"及其可能风险[J]. 教育发展研究, 2016(13/14):56-62. [5] 阎光才. 高校教师参与治理的困惑及其现实内涵[J]. 中国高教研究, 2017(7):6-11. [6] 约翰·S·布鲁贝克. 高等教育哲学[M]. 王承绪, 等, 译. 杭州:浙江教育出版社, 2002:32. [7] Bowen WG, Tobin EM. Toward a Shared Vision of Shared Governance[J]. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2015; 61(18):9-13. [8] Gary A. Olson. Exactly What Is' Shared Governance?[J]. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2009(7):18-23. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 373
- HTML全文浏览量: 80
- PDF下载量: 18
- 被引次数: 0
下载: