辨析教育符号学与符号教育学之同异

崔岐恩; 王志荣; 张晓霞

辨析教育符号学与符号教育学之同异

基金项目:

国家社科重大项目“面向自然语言理解的逻辑构建和符号接地问题的哲学、心理学研究”（18ZDA032）；浙江教育厅项目“小学生符号意识研究”（Y202043191）；温州大学侨特色项目“马来西亚华侨对中国符号的认知特征与趋势研究”（202010）

详细信息

作者简介:
崔岐恩,温州大学教育学院副教授;王志荣,教育学在读硕士;张晓霞,温州大学教育学院讲师。

中图分类号: G40
计量
- 文章访问数: 570
- HTML全文浏览量: 94
- PDF下载量: 50
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-03-06
- 刊出日期: 2021-07-10

On the Similarities and Differences between Educational Semiotics and Semiotic Education

摘要

摘要: 从跨学科角度看“教育＋符号”两大系统：一是偏向符号学的教育符号学，主要探究教育领域的符号现象和规律；二是偏向教育学的符号教育学，主要以符号学、理论资源研究教育问题。教育符号学与符号教育学两个术语能指的分野，以及所指概念之迥异，已经引起迷思。两个术语虽然研究议题和面对问题多有重合，但其区别也是明显的，主要体现在四个维度——逻辑论、本体论、方法论、实践论。从逻辑论维度而言，教育符号学是偏正结构，教育是修饰语，属符号学，所意指的符号学是整个人文社科或人类文化之全域；符号教育学也是偏正结构，符号是修饰语，属教育学，所意指的符号学是与教育学并行的另外一套系统，两者重叠领域即符号教育学。从本体论维度而言，教育符号学中的符号具有本体论意味，符号是人类生存家园，符号不仅为自然界立法，同时还为社会立法；符号教育学之教育具有本体论意味，教育是社会人生成的条件，教育是人类持续存在的家园，教育为人心立法。从方法论维度看，教育符号学中教育的育人本质是符号学伦理性保证，符号教育学中的符号是教育学的一种视角和研究方法。从实践论维度看，教育符号学主要功效在于：一是探索教育中的符号意义，二是从教育视角推进符号理论与实践；符号教育学的主要功效在于：一是探索符号中的教育意义，二是从符号视角推进教育理论与实践。
- 符号 /
- 教育学 /
- 符号学 /
- 教育符号学 /
- 符号教育学
Abstract: From the interdisciplinary point of view, the two systems of "educational signs" are:firstly, educational semiotics in favor of semiotics, which mainly explores the semiotic phenomena and laws in the field of education; secondly, semiotic education in favor of education, which mainly uses theoretical resources of semiotics to study educational issues. The distinction between educational semiotics and semiotic education, as well as the different concepts referred to, have caused confusion. Although there are many overlaps between the two terms in terms of research topics and issues, the differences are also obvious, mainly reflected in four dimensions:logic theory, ontology, methodology and practice theory. In terms of logic theory, in the endocentric structure of educational semiotics, education is the modifier that belongs to semiotics which refers to the whole domain of humanities and social sciences or human culture. On the other hand, in the endocentric structure of semiotics education, semiotics is the modifier that belongs to education. This semiotics here refers to another system parallel to education, and the overlapping field between the two is semiotic education. From the perspective of ontology, the signs in educational semiotics have ontological meaning in the sense that they are the home of human existence, and they legislate not only for nature but also for society. The education in semiotic education has ontological meaning in the sense that education is the condition for making social human beings as well as the home for the continuing existence of human beings. It legislates for human. From the perspective of methodology, the educational essence of education in educational semiotics is the ethical guarantee of semiotic, while the sign in semiotic education is a perspective and research method of pedagogy. From the perspective of practice theory, the main effects of educational semiotics are:firstly, to explore the semiotic meaning in education; secondly, to promote semiotic theory and practice from the perspective of education. The main effects of semiotic education are:firstly, to explore the educational meaning of signs; secondly, to promote educational theory and practice from the perspective of signs.
- sign /
- education /
- semiotics /
- educational semiotics /
- semiotic education

HTML全文

参考文献(35)

[1]	邱碧华, Roche, C. 本体术语学:把术语和知识本体统一起来的范式[J]. 中国科技术语, 2016(3):20-25.
[2]	崔岐恩. 国外的符号教育学及其研究进展[J]. 高等教育研究, 2016, (02):47-54.
[3]	Cunningham D. Outline of an educational semiotic[J]. American Journal of Semiotics. 1987(5):201-216.
[4]	Cunningham D, Shank, S. Semiotic education[M].//PREWITT T, J. DEELY J, HAWORTH K. Semiotics. Lanham, MD:University Press of America, 1992:64-70.
[5]	赵毅衡. 符号学原理与推演[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2011:1-10.
[6]	崔岐恩. 国外的符号教育学及其研究进展[J]. 高等教育研究, 2016(2):47-54.
[7]	赖良涛. 教育语言学[M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社, 2015(5):9.
[8]	程然. 教育符号学论纲[J]. 江苏教育学院学报(社科版), 2013(5):1-3.
[9]	程然. 论教育符号学[J]. 齐鲁师范学院学报, 2015(1):1-6.
[10]	姜得胜. 教育研究的新领域——教育符号学[J]. 教师之友, 2007(4):2-4.
[11]	姜得胜. 教育研究的新视野——符号学的观点[M]. 高雄:丽文文化事业股份有限公司, 2015:7.
[12]	涂尚. 教育符号学:教育中的符号与象征[M]. 崔岐恩, 等译. 威斯康星:德普大学出版社, 2017:10.
[13]	Semetsky I, Stables A. Education and Edusemiotics[C]. Sense Publishers, 2014:12.
[14]	Spolsky. Educational linguistics:an introduction[M]. Rowley, MA:Newbury House, 1978:3.
[15]	Johnson, K., Johnson, H. Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1998:104.
[16]	Spolsky. General introduction:the field of educational linguistics[A]. In Spolsky(ed.) Concise Encyclopedia of Educational Linguistics[C]. Amsterdam/New York:Elsevier, 1999:21.
[17]	University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education 1999-2001 Language in Education Division, in Educational Linguistics Handbook. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania, 2001:19.
[18]	Francis M. Hult. The History and Development of Educational Linguistics[A]. in Bernard Spolsky and Francis M. Hult(ed.). the Handbook of Educational Linguistics[C]. Oxford:Blackwell. 2008:16.
[19]	崔岐恩. 符号教育学论纲:第五届海峡两岸教师教育高端论坛文集[C]. 岭南师范学院2015(11):182-192.
[20]	CUNNINGHAM D, SHANK, S. Semiotic education[C]//PREWITT, T J., DEELY, J, HAWORTH, K. Semiotics. Lanham, MD:University Press of America, 1992:64-70.
[21]	Semetsky I. Semiotics Education Experience[M]. Rotterdam:Sense Publishers, 2010:1-2.
[22]	海德格尔. 存在与时间[M]. 陈嘉映, 王庆节译. 上海:生活·读书·新知三联出版社, 2014:186.
[23]	赵毅衡. 形式之谜[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社, 2016:3.
[24]	严志军, 张杰. 西方符号学理论在中国[J]. 外语学刊, 2010(6):138-141.
[25]	赵毅衡. 符号学原理与推演[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2011:1-3.
[26]	徐复观. 徐复观文集(修订本第2卷)[M]. 武汉:湖北长江出版集团, 2009:19.
[27]	Semetsky, I. Reading kristeva through the lens of edusemiotics:implications for education[J]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2015, 10(47):1069.
[28]	叶舒宪, 章米力, 柳倩月. 文化符号学——大小传统新视野[M]. 西安:陕西师范大学出版社, 2013:12.
[29]	龚鹏程. 文化符号学[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2009:1.
[30]	何新. 艺术现象的符号文化学阐释[M]. 北京:人民文学出版社, 1987:8.
[31]	吴凤鸣. 加强交叉学科的术语研究[DB/OL].[2020-11-01]. http://www.term.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10730.shtml.
[32]	张骋. "符号传播学"与"传播符号学":一对不能相互替代的术语[J]. 符号与传媒, 2017(14):56-65.
[33]	Cunningham. Semiotics and Education[J]. Semiotica, 2007(164):1-4.
[34]	Stables, A, Semetsky, I. Edusemiotics:semiotic philosophy as educational foundation[C]. Routledge, 2014(11):1-2.
[35]	韦伯. 学术与政治[M]. 钱永祥, 译. 桂林:广西师范大学出版社, 2010:9.