“家长主义”时代家校的权利边界、互动机制与教育公平

赵同友

“家长主义”时代家校的权利边界、互动机制与教育公平

赵同友

温州大学教育学院, 温州 325035

详细信息

中图分类号: G636
计量
- 文章访问数: 832
- HTML全文浏览量: 192
- PDF下载量: 128
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-01

The Rights Boundary, Interaction Mechanism and Educational Equity Between Home and School in Parentocracy Era

ZHAO Tongyou

摘要

摘要: 全球教育的结构性变动，市场经济和技术的快速发展，再次突显家长在子女教育中的重要作用。“家长主义”时代的到来，成为重构家校权利关系、追求教育公平的良好机遇。然而，藉由技术中介主导下的学校治理，建立不平等的权力控制机制与家长互动，把家长培养成为自我改造的知识主体，引发了家长间的相互监督与竞争，强化了教育的文化与社会再生产功能。故而，需要在理论和规范上厘清家长和学校的权利边界；要从根本上反思学校灌输给家长知识的性质，鉴别知识的教育性与非教育性；赋权家长，在家长群体内部发展“公共家长”，减轻教师负担，创造公平的教育环境。
- 家长主义 /
- 家长参与 /
- 家校互动 /
- “公共家长” /
- 教育公平
Abstract: The structural changes in global education and the rapid development of capital and market economy have once again highlighted the important role of parents in their children's education. Parentocracy offers a good opportunity to reconstruct the power relationship between parents and the school, and to pursue educational equity. However, the existence of the school as a rigid system, through the intermediary effect of technology, establish an unequal power control mechanism to interact with parents, which cultivates parents to be the subject of self-reform knowledge and triggers mutual supervision and capital competition among parents, strengthening the cultural and social reproduction functions of education. Research suggests that it is necessary to clarify the boundary of rights between parents and schools in theory and norms. It is necessary to fundamentally reflect on the nature of the knowledge that schools instill in parents, and to distinguish the educational and non-educational knowledge. It is also important to empower parents to develop' public parents' within parent group, in order to reduce the burden on teachers and create a fair educational environment.
- Parentocracy /
- parental educational involvement /
- home-school interaction /
- educational equity /

HTML全文

参考文献(36)

[1]	Phillip, B. The"Third Wave":Education and the ideology of parentocracy[J]. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1990(1):65-86.
[2]	马赛厄斯﹒德普克,法布里奇奥﹒齐利博蒂.爱、金钱和孩子:育儿经济学[M].吴娴,鲁敏儿译.上海:格致出版社, 2019:14.
[3]	이종각. 교육열 올바로 보기:그 정체는 무엇어며 어떻게 다루어야 하나? [M]. 서을:원미사, 2003：68.
[4]	马相镛.中国家庭教育史[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社, 1997:5-6.
[5]	柯林斯,哈尔弗森.教育大变局:技术时代重新思考教育[M].陈家刚译.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2020:91-95.
[6]	詹姆斯﹒ J ﹒科尔曼.社会理论的基础[M].邓方译.北京:社会科学文献出版社, 1999:380.
[7]	Ho. S. C. Parent involvement:A comparison of different definitions and explanations[J]. Educational Journal, 1995(23):39-68.
[8]	Barton C., Drake C., Perez J. G., Louis K. S. Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education[J]. Educational Researcher, 2004 (33):3-12.
[9]	Lareau, A. Home advantage:School class and parental intervention in elementary education. Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, 2000:8.
[10]	Reglin, G. Project reading and writing (R. A. W.):Home visitations and the school involvement of high-risk families[J]. Education, 2002 (13):153-160.
[11]	Waterman, J. M. Understanding the impact of parent school involvement on children's educational outcomes[J]. The Journal of Educational Research, 1998(91):370-381.
[12]	Vincent, C. Parent empowerment?Collective action and inaction in education[J]. Oxford Review of Educaiton, 1996(4):465-482.
[13]	Corinne E. Barrett DeWiele1. Jason D. Edgerton. Parentocracy revisited:Still a relevant concept for understanding middle class educational advantage?[J]. Interchange, 2016(47):189-210.
[14]	Stevenson, D. L, Baker, D. P. Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling:Transition to university in Japan[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1992(6):1639-1657.
[15]	Zhao, T. Y., Hwang, S. H. Parents'motivations for choosing private tutoring in urban China[J]. Studies in Humanities, 2012(3):371-401.
[16]	Kim, T. J. Shadow education:School quality and demand for private tutoring in Korea[R]. KEDI School Working Paper Series, 2004:4-21.
[17]	Collins, A, Halverson, R. The second educational revolution:Rethinking education in the age of technology[J]. Journal of Computer Assistant Learinging, 2010(26):18-27
[18]	福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴译.北京:生活读书新知三联书店, 2016.
[19]	赵同友.家长教育参与:行动、信念与脉络[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2018:79-82.
[20]	杨海琴. "我就退出家长群怎么了",别让家长群变"压力群"[N].中国青年报. 2020-11-01, http://news.cyol.com/app/2020-11 /01/content_18835817.htm.
[21]	福柯.自我技术[M].汪民安编.北京:北京大学出版社, 2019:80.
[22]	Popkewitz, T. A political sociology'of education reform:Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research[M]. New York:Teacher College Press, 1991:80.
[23]	姜添辉.不均教育结果的成因:理性资本与不同社会阶级家长的教育行动[J].清华大学教育研究, 2010(6):19-26.
[24]	Turner, R. Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system[J]. American Sociological Review 1960, 25:855-867.
[25]	Seginer, R. Parents'educational involvement:A developmental ecology perspective[J]. Parenting Science and Practice, 2006, 6(1):1- 48
[26]	Gordon, I. J. The effects of parent involvement on schooling. In Vrandt, R. S.(Eds.) Partners:Parents and Schools[M]. Washington DC:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Press, 1979:4-25.
[27]	Epstein, J. Longitudinal effects of family-school-person interactions on student outcomes[J]. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 1983(4):101-127.
[28]	Diaz, J. D. A cultural history of reforming math for all[M]. Routledge, 2018:4.
[29]	程家福,董美英,陈松林,窦艳.高等学校分层与社会各阶层入学机会均等问题研究[J].中国高教研究, 2017(3):48-56.
[30]	姜添辉.生物政治学视角下的教师表现力:一个全球性的议题[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020(10):1-20.
[31]	Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Sandler, H. M.. Why do parents become involved in their children's education?[J] Review of Educational Research, 1997(1):3-42.
[32]	渠敬东.缺席与断裂:有关失范的社会学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2017:52.
[33]	布尔迪厄.区分:判断力的批判[M].刘晖译.北京:商务印书馆2015:112.
[34]	Weis, L., Cipollone, A.'Class work':Producing privilege and social mobility in elite US secondary schools[J]. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2013(5-6):701-722.
[35]	李忠路,邱泽奇.家庭背景如何影响儿童学业成就?——义务教育阶段家庭社会经济地位影响差异分析[J].社会学研究, 2016 (4):121-144.
[36]	沈洪成.激活优势:家长主义浪潮下的家长参与的群体差异[J].社会, 2020(2):168-203.